I am glad we lost and here is why

dbldrew

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 24, 2012
Posts:
5,969
Liked Posts:
2,529
They offered him below market for a franchise QB. Just like the Giants offered below market for a franchise QB. And given QBs are hard to find yes teams sometimes offer guys below market deals.

So Aaron Rodgers was never viewed as a franchise QB? I mean he was constantly making "below market" In fact he barley made over the first offer that Prescott got after the 2018 season of 30mil vs Rodgers 33mil and both below Big ben and Wilson.

All you had to do was say.. "yeah got that one wrong, Prescott was better then I thought" DONE

But here we are and your non stop stupidity of trying to vortex out of this and every post makes you look dumber.
 

onebud34

Packer Fan
Donator
Joined:
Aug 16, 2011
Posts:
22,393
Liked Posts:
12,266
Location:
Favorite Corner Bar
My favorite teams
  1. Minnesota Twins
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Minnesota Wild
So Aaron Rodgers was never viewed as a franchise QB? I mean he was constantly making "below market" In fact he barley made over the first offer that Prescott got after the 2018 season of 30mil vs Rodgers 33mil and both below Big ben and Wilson.

All you had to do was say.. "yeah got that one wrong, Prescott was better then I thought" DONE

But here we are and your non stop stupidity of trying to vortex out of this and every post makes you look dumber.

:jonesy:
 

remydat

CCS Hall of Fame
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '19
Joined:
Sep 15, 2012
Posts:
62,015
Liked Posts:
39,898
So Aaron Rodgers was never viewed as a franchise QB? I mean he was constantly making "below market" In fact he barley made over the first offer that Prescott got after the 2018 season of 30mil vs Rodgers 33mil and both below Big ben and Wilson.

All you had to do was say.. "yeah got that one wrong, Prescott was better then I thought" DONE

But here we are and your non stop stupidity of trying to vortex out of this and every post makes you look dumber.

No stupid. Rodgers is 5 years older than Wilson. By contrast Prescott is 5 years younger than Wilson. If Prescott were truly considered a franchise QB then he would get more than Wilson because he is 5 years younger and in his prime. Hence why he held out and got 10m more when he did prove he was worth it.
 

dbldrew

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 24, 2012
Posts:
5,969
Liked Posts:
2,529
No stupid. Rodgers is 5 years older than Wilson. By contrast Prescott is 5 years younger than Wilson. If Prescott were truly considered a franchise QB then he would get more than Wilson because he is 5 years younger and in his prime. Hence why he held out and got 10m more when he did prove he was worth it.
Forgot about Big Ben being older then Rodgers did ya?
This has to be a css record of the most idiotic posts in a row.
 

remydat

CCS Hall of Fame
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '19
Joined:
Sep 15, 2012
Posts:
62,015
Liked Posts:
39,898
Forgot about Big Ben being older then Rodgers did ya?
This has to be a css record of the most idiotic posts in a row.

I didn't say anything about Big Ben but he is like 1 year older and signed a short 2 year extension for 68 while Rodgers signed a 4 year contract for 134. Don't be stupid stupid. The Rodgers contract is better as he had 99m guaranteed compared with 37m for Big Ben.
 
Last edited:

dbldrew

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 24, 2012
Posts:
5,969
Liked Posts:
2,529
I didn't say anything about Big Ben but he is like 1 year over. Don't be stupid stupid.
I said something about Big Ben and Rodgers a few posts up and your attempt to vortex yourself out of it again made you look stupid.

You make the claim that you are not a franchise QB if you have been payed "below market" this is stupid, that means that Rodgers was never viewed as a franchise QB by your vortex logic. You trying to vortex out of it by attempting to change the rules based on age. The problem is I also mentioned that Big Ben being payed more then Rodgers so this attempt fails because Rodgers is younger and payed less then Big Ben, so again we are back to your vortex logic must state that the packers didnt view Rodgers as a franchise QB.

You look so stupid in this interaction, why are you continuing down this attempt?
 

remydat

CCS Hall of Fame
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '19
Joined:
Sep 15, 2012
Posts:
62,015
Liked Posts:
39,898
I said something about Big Ben and Rodgers a few posts up and your attempt to vortex yourself out of it again made you look stupid.

You make the claim that you are not a franchise QB if you have been payed "below market" this is stupid, that means that Rodgers was never viewed as a franchise QB by your vortex logic. You trying to vortex out of it by attempting to change the rules based on age. The problem is I also mentioned that Big Ben being payed more then Rodgers so this attempt fails because Rodgers is younger and payed less then Big Ben, so again we are back to your vortex logic must state that the packers didnt view Rodgers as a franchise QB.

You look so stupid in this interaction, why are you continuing down this attempt?

You really can't be this stupid. Rodgers didn't get below market. He signed in 2018 for 4 years and 134m or 33.5m a year. He got a record SB and Wilson had not signed his deal yet. So at the time he signed he was in fact making more than Big Ben and Wilson. No idea how your dumbass concluded a record SB is not market value.

Wilson as the next franchise QB up got 4 for 140 ie more than the previous guy Rodgers. So you are proving my point. The Seahawks gave him more than Rodgers because he was a franchise QB that was younger.

By contrast Dak was offered less than Rodgers was the year before and despite being 10 years younger. He was also offered less than Wilson. Even Big Ben who is 11 years older was offered more than Dak.

So thanks for proving my point. Rodgers got a record breaking contract and the franchise QBs that signed deals after him got offered more per year while the Cowboys low balled Dak until after his big season in 2019.
 

dbldrew

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 24, 2012
Posts:
5,969
Liked Posts:
2,529

You really can't be this stupid. Rodgers didn't get below market. He signed in 2018 for 4 years and 134m or 33.5m a year. He got a record SB and Wilson had not signed his deal yet. So at the time he signed he was in fact making more than Bi Ben and Wilson.

Big Ben and Wilson signed in ie after Rodgers dumbass. Wilson as the next franchise QB up got 4 for 140 ie more than the previous guy Rodgers. So you are proving my point. The Seahakws gave him more than Rodgers because he was a back franchise QB that was younger.

By contrast Dak was offered less than Rodgers was the year before and despite being 10 years younger. He was also offered less than Wilson. Even Big Ben who is 11 years older was offered more than Dak.

So thanks for proving my point. Rodgers got a record breaking contract and the franchise QBs that signed deals after him got offered more per year.
2019 Rodgers was making less then Big Ben and Wilson.. just stop your stupidity
 

remydat

CCS Hall of Fame
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '19
Joined:
Sep 15, 2012
Posts:
62,015
Liked Posts:
39,898
2019 Rodgers was making less then Big Ben and Wilson.. just stop your stupidity

Again you are stupid. The point is if you are a franchise QB you get a deal close to the top end of the market. Rodgers got his deal in 2018 and the franchise QBs that signed after him got more per year. Meanwhile Prescott was offered less than Rodgers, Wilson and Big Ben despite coming after them.

Do you not grasp how FA works? If you are comparable to others and you sign after then you typically get a bit more than them. That is what happened with Wilson and Big Ben. Dallas did not want to do that with Dak.
 

dbldrew

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 24, 2012
Posts:
5,969
Liked Posts:
2,529
Again you are stupid. The point is if you are a franchise QB you get a deal close to the top end of the market. Rodgers got his deal in 2018 and the franchise QBs that signed after him got more per year. Meanwhile Prescott was offered less than Rodgers, Wilson and Big Ben despite coming after them.

Do you not grasp how FA works? If you are comparable to others and you sign after then you typically get a bit more than them. That is what happened with Wilson and Big Ben. Dallas did not want to do that with Dak.
So now you are throttling it back to close to the top, because you realized how stupid your point was?

Unfortunately for you we have merged back to the 30mil offered to Prescott was just 3 mil lower then Rodgers and 5 mil lower then the highest payed.

You are all over the place here man. There is something wrong with you where you would rather go through all this and present yourself as such a moron rather then just admit you had a take on a QB that was wrong.

Are you on the spectrum or something? because this is not normal, I'm actually starting to feel bad about pointing out how dumb you are being.
 

remydat

CCS Hall of Fame
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '19
Joined:
Sep 15, 2012
Posts:
62,015
Liked Posts:
39,898
So now you are throttling it back to close to the top, because you realized how stupid your point was?

Unfortunately for you we have merged back to the 30mil offered to Prescott was just 3 mil lower then Rodgers and 5 mil lower then the highest payed.

You are all over the place here man. There is something wrong with you where you would rather go through all this and present yourself as such a moron rather then just admit you had a take on a QB that was wrong.

Are you on the spectrum or something? because this is not normal, I'm actually starting to feel bad about pointing out how dumb you are being.

So what you are telling me is despite being 10 years younger than Rodgers and in his absolute prime he was offered less. Then 2 older QBs ie Wilson and Big Ben both got more.
 

dbldrew

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 24, 2012
Posts:
5,969
Liked Posts:
2,529
So what you are telling me is despite being 10 years younger than Rodgers and in his absolute prime he was offered less. Then 2 older QBs ie Wilson and Big Ben both got more.
So what you're telling me is that the cowboys didn't think he was a franchise QB so they offered him 30mil per year.. 5 mil less then the highest payed QB.. this is stupid and you know it and no amount of vortex will change how stupid this is.
 

remydat

CCS Hall of Fame
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '19
Joined:
Sep 15, 2012
Posts:
62,015
Liked Posts:
39,898
So what you're telling me is that the cowboys didn't think he was a franchise QB so they offered him 30mil per year.. 5 mil less then the highest payed QB.. this is stupid and you know it and no amount of vortex will change how stupid this is.

Yes just like Daniel Jones was offered 40m but is not a franchise QB. Teams overpay QBs all the time.
 

dbldrew

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 24, 2012
Posts:
5,969
Liked Posts:
2,529
Yes just like Daniel Jones was offered 40m but is not a franchise QB. Teams overpay QBs all the time.
Him looking like he is not a franchise QB is not the debate, you said the cowboys didn't think Prescott was a franchise QB.

The Giants absolutely THOUGH DJ was a franchise QB and that's why they offered him so much, turns out it looks like they where wrong, but that's irrelevant to what you said.

A team will either think a QB is worth building the franchise around and they will offer him a shit ton of $$ or they don't think he is worth building around and they won't.

You know your evaluation of Prescott after the 2018 season was wrong, and rather then just admit that you tried to say that the Cowboys agreed with you and here we are with you looking so much worse
 

remydat

CCS Hall of Fame
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '19
Joined:
Sep 15, 2012
Posts:
62,015
Liked Posts:
39,898
Him looking like he is not a franchise QB is not the debate, you said the cowboys didn't think Prescott was a franchise QB.

The Giants absolutely THOUGH DJ was a franchise QB and that's why they offered him so much, turns out it looks like they where wrong, but that's irrelevant to what you said.

A team will either think a QB is worth building the franchise around and they will offer him a shit ton of $$ or they don't think he is worth building around and they won't.

You know your evaluation of Prescott after the 2018 season was wrong, and rather then just admit that you tried to say that the Cowboys agreed with you and here we are with you looking so much worse

No they didnt. They just didnt want to start over at QB.
 

Top