genefoley
New member
- Joined:
- May 16, 2010
- Posts:
- 564
- Liked Posts:
- 0
- Location:
- Blue Island, IL
**** YOU AUGER
What a shit-show.
With that loss, Hawks chances of making the playoffs dropped to 65%
Gonna have to make hay on the road.
Yikes!
Says what/who? My calculations say they are the 8th seed right now while trailing the 2nd seed by 8 pts and the 4th by 4 pts.
Says what/who? My calculations say they are the 8th seed right now while trailing the 2nd seed by 8 pts and the 4th by 4 pts.
What a shit call there at the end by Auger, unfucking real. This team shows so much brilliance inter-mixed with so much mediocrity it is infuriating.
They looked amazing in the first period.
Then Minnesota took over with their snooze fest brand of hockey.
A couple of bad decisions by Seabs led to scoring opportunities, but I feel that Craw had a bad game.
I just wish that Boynton would stop finishing checks that leave his D partner hanging out to dry.
Players that had good games: Kane, Toews, Keith.
I think everything has been said about the ref losing sight of the puck.
Man, PJ, I don't see why you think those stats hold any water. It doesn't seem possible to calculate the odds a team has to make the playoffs. It doesn't know how to take into account things that happen to teams and how they play. Clearly, in the NHL any team can beat any one on any given night. Not to mention I haven't been able to find anything confirming the legitimacy of that site. They're right in the thick of it at the break and I said they were the 8th seed but they're actually tied for 7th
I bet Auger got an earful from Campbell(Colin) after the game and will learn from his mistake.
Go Hawks. Gonna be healthy and focused after this break, I can feel it. I really think the road will work wonders for cohesion on this team.
I have only one thing to say about sportsclub stats, and that the percentage calculated is based on trends from all teams, strength of play against teams, etc. It tends to be fairly accurate when all is said and done. But keep in mind it is all based on team trending, and there is also a list of scenerios that change the % chance. Also, there are some really good teams listed that are in the lower 70% range, and that is because there are still a decent amount of games left in the season, and the trends can change.
Auger....lol, just remember that he lied to some of us when we asked him if he officiated the game in Nashville. Was not until his picture on nhlofficials.com changed his tune.
Oh well, I throw this game more to the missed opportunities. Hawks had their chances and just could not capitalize.
There's a 90% chance I take a shit in the morning. That's factual. Any NUMBER of things can happen to throw those numbers off.
I blocked puck jims stupidity so if you "quote" it I have to read it.
Please don't quote him. 65% chance he'll say something factual instead of pulling 65% out of his ass.
On a side note this team needs to STOP taking it's foot off the gas.
And Stephan Auger, **** YOU, YOU PEICE OF FUCKIGN SHIT!
That is all.
They looked amazing in the first period.
Then Minnesota took over with their snooze fest brand of hockey.
A couple of bad decisions by Seabs led to scoring opportunities, but I feel that Craw had a bad game.
I just wish that Boynton would stop finishing checks that leave his D partner hanging out to dry.
Players that had good games: Kane, Toews, Keith.
I think everything has been said about the ref losing sight of the puck.
Right now they have a 100% chance to make the playoffs because they are the 8th seed... until they are out of the playoff window, that number doesn't change. Don't know where he gets those random numbers.