Alpha Male
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Sep 15, 2013
- Posts:
- 3,974
- Liked Posts:
- 1,638
He was a better HC than DC. The year he called plays in chicago the defense was horrible and he was the DC for the no defense rams.I'd let him be the DC only.
He was a better HC than DC. The year he called plays in chicago the defense was horrible and he was the DC for the no defense rams.I'd let him be the DC only.
Who is Jeff Johnson?
FT 2.0 is just 1.0. Nothing new to see there. BTW, I feel Liepold would be a very good hire. He has won at every level he has coached. I'll leave it up to Whitman to announce who it is. He may try to snag a bigger fish.Congratulations on saying it would fail. My observation from fan message boards is that 95% of fans say everything will fail, so...congrats, I guess.
It is absolutely inconceivable to me that people think Illinois at this point should hire Scheelhaase.Smart money on Leipold, he's the safest bet to have a decent floor and the program could really use that right now.
Jamey Chadwell is a risky play because he has no experience of any kind at a P5 and only a few years at the FBS level, but Coastal has been marginal for years and he's got them playing great. Unique offense, team just doesn't make mistakes, they play with confidence. Recruiting is the biggest question mark.
I don't think Malzahn would take it but I'd definitely call him. Lots of people are talking up Scheelhasse. I don't know if he's ready. Napier is going to probably go SEC. Clark Lea? Not a bad idea but would he come. No to Jim Leonardt, I don't think he'd come anyway.
To me, Leipold makes too much sense if he's interested, he's got midwestern roots and UI would probably increase his salary by 500%. At this stage in his career it would probably be tough to turn that down.
Oddly, last time around, anyone wanting Kevin Sumlin was "dreaming", because there was no way he would consider Illinois. And now, I am hoping Illinois is not considering him.FT 2.0 is just 1.0. Nothing new to see there. BTW, I feel Liepold would be a very good hire. He has won at every level he has coached. I'll leave it up to Whitman to announce who it is. He may try to snag a bigger fish.
He never wanted a quarterback
Because Lovie didn’t give a shit about offense. Didn’t care to have a good o-line, didn’t care for a good QB and didn’t care for wide receivers either.Why wouldn't a HC want a Qb? When Bill Belichick was HC in Cleveland, did he not want a Qb? If ya look around the NFL there are decent HC's that just don't have good Qb's. Is it cuz they don't want them?
Why wouldn't a HC want a Qb? When Bill Belichick was HC in Cleveland, did he not want a Qb? If ya look around the NFL and college there are decent HC's that just don't have good Qb's. Is it cuz they don't want them?
Because Lovie didn’t give a shit about offense. Didn’t care to have a good o-line, didn’t care for a good QB and didn’t care for wide receivers either.
Run and Shoot truth's:What I saw here with the Bears is him turning the offense over to the OC. And that's what most OC's prefer. What I did see here was a cycling through of various offense coaches to accommodate jay.
An argument could be made that the OC's and cutler failed Smith.
I thought he would have been a better recruiter, to have Northwestern pass you up is intolerable with a school of 60,000 and moderate qualifications necessary. You should have every piece of the puzzle you could want.
How can a black former NFL coach known for defense not recruit an LSU/Alabama type defense?
I just would have expected him and Herm Edwards could have done better so I guess I don't understand the dynamics of college football or what attracts top parents/players to a program.
If I was a 5 star athlete parent and I saw Herm Edwards was coaching a team...it would take Nick Saban to change my course. You could have had Arizona weather and Herm Edwards mentoring your child. How do they not recruit a top 5 defense in all the land?
Nate has recruiting chops. Campbell is on record saying Nate is a star in the making. That said, he needs a OC gig first.It is absolutely inconceivable to me that people think Illinois at this point should hire Scheelhaase.
He has no HC experience at any level. No experience as a coordinator at any level. No clue if he has any recruiting chops at all. Unlikely he has the connections to hire a top staff.
If he played at a school other than Illinois he would not possibly on the minds of the same fans who want to hire him. And that is the very last reason to hire a coach: "He played here".
They aren’t. If Sumlin stays P5 level. it will be as OC.Oddly, last time around, anyone wanting Kevin Sumlin was "dreaming", because there was no way he would consider Illinois. And now, I am hoping Illinois is not considering him.
Hearing Whitman does indeed have a bigger fish on the line. Will be very cool, if true.FT 2.0 is just 1.0. Nothing new to see there. BTW, I feel Liepold would be a very good hire. He has won at every level he has coached. I'll leave it up to Whitman to announce who it is. He may try to snag a bigger fish.
I hope that's true. I won't kid myself into thinking Illinois is real attractive to top coaches, but I have seen ten or twelve names mentioned so far and I kind of think it won't be any of them.Hearing Whitman does indeed have a bigger fish on the line. Will be very cool, if true.
Lovie should have retired 15 years ago. Organized football has passed him by