Globetrotter
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Aug 21, 2010
- Posts:
- 3,543
- Liked Posts:
- 1,198
See you next year!
You leaving?
See you next year!
That would be the forum's dreamYou leaving?
Q trying to make people forget Brick for Broglio. ��
So basically what ive been saying all along...lolAll said and done I’m not a huge fan of the results from the rotation this year. I’m not sure if it is a Hickey issue or what. Bosio May have personality issues but he was a dam good coach. He didn’t seem to cater to the vets. Hickey I’m not sure honestly. Looking at the surface it seems like staff regression.
Think it's a bit disingenuous to look at the starting rotation issue and ignore the fact you're basically playing the entire season without Darvish. I mean imagine the 2016 or 2017 teams without Arrieta. The rotation would have looked as bad. I have said this before but if you get a healthy Darvish back then i think a lot of the issues will fade. Lester has been pretty typical. Hendricks I think is fairly close to normal but he's had some spotty command issues for him. That's not uncommon as he had similar issues last year before going on the DL. If you get those 3 back and playing like they can it's going to look entirely different.
Q I don't really have answers for. He was one of the most consistent pitchers in baseball and it's frankly surprising to me how he's fallen off. Obviously there's always a chance for him to go back there but at this point I'm left scratching my head on him.
As for Chatwood, i mean sure how he's been bad is kind of surprising but we always knew he was an upside gamble. The thing is if he ever gets his career walk rate back I still think his contract is a pretty good deal because the fact he was even able to survive this long in a rotation with a 8.14 bb/9 is shocking. To put that number in context, Rick Ankiel got the yips and had a 9.38 bb/9 and despite having a k/9 rate over 10 still had a 7.13/8.09 ERA/FIP. Chatwood some what shockingly is still only at 4.98/5.57 or roughly 2/3 that.
Darvish being in the rotation has zero effect on what theyve gotten out of Quintana and Hendricks overall to date..Think it's a bit disingenuous to look at the starting rotation issue and ignore the fact you're basically playing the entire season without Darvish. I mean imagine the 2016 or 2017 teams without Arrieta. The rotation would have looked as bad. I have said this before but if you get a healthy Darvish back then i think a lot of the issues will fade. Lester has been pretty typical. Hendricks I think is fairly close to normal but he's had some spotty command issues for him. That's not uncommon as he had similar issues last year before going on the DL. If you get those 3 back and playing like they can it's going to look entirely different.
Q I don't really have answers for. He was one of the most consistent pitchers in baseball and it's frankly surprising to me how he's fallen off. Obviously there's always a chance for him to go back there but at this point I'm left scratching my head on him.
As for Chatwood, i mean sure how he's been bad is kind of surprising but we always knew he was an upside gamble. The thing is if he ever gets his career walk rate back I still think his contract is a pretty good deal because the fact he was even able to survive this long in a rotation with a 8.14 bb/9 is shocking. To put that number in context, Rick Ankiel got the yips and had a 9.38 bb/9 and despite having a k/9 rate over 10 still had a 7.13/8.09 ERA/FIP. Chatwood some what shockingly is still only at 4.98/5.57 or roughly 2/3 that.
Darvish being in the rotation has zero effect on what theyve gotten out of Quintana and Hendricks overall to date..
Outside of Chatwood garbage, those two have been disappointing..
Guess yes, if Darvish had been pitching all year they could of moved Chatwood out earlier for Montgomery
But
Other then that Quintana and Hendricks are on their own for their dismal season
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G935A using Tapatalk
As far as Hendricks is concerned..I think you're underestimating the impact having an ace matters. Think about it like this, not having an ace in the line up puts more pressure on others. That then becomes a vicious cycle if say Hendricks throws a bad game because the next guy may go out there trying to do too much to help the bullpen out....etc. And when you add in the fact that obviously Chatwood hasn't worked it's plausible that as much as anything has been the issue.
Also I think you're being a bit hard on Hendricks. He's not been amazing but he's not been terrible either. The difference between a 3.52 ERA and his current 4.05 ERA is 10 runs over his 21 starts. More over, he's not been terrible in games. He's only had 4 starts where he gave up more than 4 runs. Point here being he's obviously not as sharp as he can be but it's not like he's going out there often and giving up 6 in the first inning a la Q yesterday. He's really just had a bad june. His April ERA was 3.10. His May ERA was 3.26. His June ERA was 7.03 and his July ERA is 3.54.
As far as Hendricks is concerned..
It not the amount of runs given up that been disappointing ..
It the lack of innings that been disappointing..
He has gone 6+ in just 9 of 21 starts
As far as not having that "Ace" goes, that when guys like Quintana and Hendricks who are veterans and has had good seasons, need to step up and be that guy to help ease the loss of the Ace..
Not saying they need to be top notch every start but a whole lot better then they've been
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G935A using Tapatalk
As far as Hendricks is concerned..
It not the amount of runs given up that been disappointing ..
It the lack of innings that been disappointing..
He has gone 6+ in just 9 of 21 starts
As far as not having that "Ace" goes, that when guys like Quintana and Hendricks who are veterans and has had good seasons, need to step up and be that guy to help ease the loss of the Ace..
Not saying they need to be top notch every start but a whole lot better then they've been
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G935A using Tapatalk
Weve seen Hendricks pitch under pressure in big games, so i dont buy that excuse for him..More of a mind set. Some guys don’t do pressure
Weve seen Hendricks pitch under pressure in big games, so i dont buy that excuse for him..
And
If that the case for these 2 veteran SP that supposed to be TOR types, then they need to go
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G935A using Tapatalk
You dont see a problem with a SP who supposed to be a guy they counted on, pitching 5 innings or less in 12 of his 21 starts?He's thrown 120 innings in 21 starts. That's an average of 5.71 innings per start. I don't really see the concern. Lester in 21 starts has thrown 120.2 innings. If you remove the 5 starts he had in June where clearly he lost his mechanics, that goes up to 5.98 innings per start.
Lol...I think they are MOR
You dont see a problem with a SP who supposed to be a guy they counted on, pitching 5 innings or less in 12 of his 21 starts?
Hendricks has gone pass the 5th inning 3 times in his last 11 starts..
That not good
That 5th starter territory
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G935A using Tapatalk