I mean, we might be splitting hairs here. I don’t disagree that he might be an O.K. one-year stopgap. I’m just saying, he’s not good.
And I’m not suggesting the Bears should’ve kept Trubisky, but I don’t think Dalton is much of an upgrade.
I think his good years from Cincy are gone. I don’t think they’re coming back. The numbers seem to bear that out, but if folks disagree, that’s fine.
I think the point of my disagreement with you is whether Dalton is a good mentor and influence on Fields, not so much his skills as the starter.
It’s not exactly a secret that Dalton isn’t the future of the franchise. Him giving advice and mentoring, based on him being a hardworking individual who maximized his skills, is an asset.
Think of it like this, was Evander Holyfield great because of talent? Nope. Sheer hard work. I see Dalton as in the same mould.
Would you want Michael Jordan with all his physical gifts teaching you or Stephon Curry who willed himself through hard work and grit to be the player he is, despite his athleticism?
Again, I see Dalton as a good asset for Fields, right now, and it gives us the luxury of starting Fields when he’s ready.