- Joined:
- Jun 15, 2010
- Posts:
- 46,095
- Liked Posts:
- 35,326
My favorite teams
run and shit has been on this for three years now.
Who was the asshole that said it was between 60-80 million? Why did they lie?
Rumor floating around is that the settlement is for 80 million.
The NFL taking an L. I guess they did not have the bodies buried as deep as they thought.
Don't think for a second the lawsuit against the NFL was ever about the money. Them coming to an agreement got what he wanted, and admission of guilt through a settlement.
Looks like a lot of knuckleheads were wrong wrong wrong. ?????Don't think for a second the lawsuit against the NFL was ever about the money. Them coming to an agreement got what he wanted, and admission of guilt through a settlement.
Oh here we go... we all know how these cases work. Carry on.I was not aware there was an admission of guilt...
Oh here we go... we all know how these cases work. Carry on.
You're right. Sexual discrimination or harassment cases just get money thrown at them in settlements because they "want it to go away" and they aren't "admitting guilt". The list could go on quite a ways for how common of a practice this is.No. Simply paying money to make a case go away is not an admission of guilt.
We may never know the actual facts of what happened. That won’t stop people from using speculation to paint their reality.
I am neither making a case for nor against the NFL, but simply pointing out that a payout proves nothing either way.
In the world of litigation companies will pay money to make lawsuits go away whether they are in the right or not.
Individuals are also allowed to create lawsuits that may lack merit, but draw enough bad publicity that it makes it easier and more cost effective to just pay off the accuser rather than have a long drawn out public affair. The merit of the case one way or the other more often than not has little to do with a settlement.You're right. Sexual discrimination or harassment cases just get money thrown at them in settlements because they "want it to go away" and they aren't "admitting guilt". The list could go on quite a ways for how common of a practice this is.
Technically, you're correct, it's a settlement, not a conviction or a ruling, but that's exactly how they want people to react to it.
Corrupt corporations and wealthy individuals have the option to throw money at their problems to make them go away without ever having legal recourse. People turn a blind eye to it and just say "well they aren't guilty". That's cool, that's your opinion. I don't share it, and a lot of others don't see it that way either.
Who was the asshole that said it was between 60-80 million? Why did they lie?
I see this way too much, the association of Patriot and a racist. They are NOT one in the same....And anger the R̶a̶c̶i̶s̶t̶ patriots that love the country?
I see this way too much, the association of Patriot and a racist. They are NOT one in the same....
I support his right to protest (I consider myself a Patriot and I served for 21 years). So in my case, they are not one in the same. Would I prefer that he do it in some other manner, perhaps, but the right to protest and the freedom to do it is exactly what I served to protect.Sorry but in this case they are. Anyone upset that some black guy was peaceful protesting before the actual game and using the veil of patriotism is a racist
I'll agree to that. Like other topics where the arguments always seem one sided, I think the subject is way more intricate than what I stated vs the other flip side of the coin. It all happens in many shapes and forms for various reasons.Individuals are also allowed to create lawsuits that may lack merit, but draw enough bad publicity that it makes it easier and more cost effective to just pay off the accuser rather than have a long drawn out public affair. The merit of the case one way or the other more often than not has little to do with a settlement.
I support his right to protest (I consider myself a Patriot and I served for 21 years). So in my case, they are not one in the same. Would I prefer that he do it in some other manner, perhaps, but the right to protest and the freedom to do it is exactly what I served to protect.
I'm a Patriot and NOT a racist.
Good for you, it sounds like you made an informed well reasoned decision, as did I, and it's fine if we respectfully disagree on a conclusion.I support his right to protest (I consider myself a Patriot and I served for 21 years). So in my case, they are not one in the same. Would I prefer that he do it in some other manner, perhaps, but the right to protest and the freedom to do it is exactly what I served to protect.
I'm a Patriot and NOT a racist.
Originally Posted by bearmick The whole thing is ridiculous. Just play the game. Why do we need an anthem and minor military parade every time a sports event is played?
You're right. Sexual discrimination or harassment cases just get money thrown at them in settlements because they "want it to go away" and they aren't "admitting guilt". The list could go on quite a ways for how common of a practice this is.
Technically, you're correct, it's a settlement, not a conviction or a ruling, but that's exactly how they want people to react to it.
Corrupt corporations and wealthy individuals have the option to throw money at their problems to make them go away without ever having legal recourse. People turn a blind eye to it and just say "well they aren't guilty". That's cool, that's your opinion. I don't share it, and a lot of others don't see it that way either.