WookieOnRitalin
Active member
- Joined:
- Mar 14, 2015
- Posts:
- 425
- Liked Posts:
- 436
lol you’re acting like cook was some bum
Reality is, he’s 3rd all time in the schools passing yards for a career. He’s not some nobody QB that was throwing to burden
And so, you cannot give a game against an actual good defense where burden played really well. All you can do is give excuses about the QB. You make it out to be only the QB struggled against good defenses. Like both can struggle, you realize right?
Also, not every game against good defenses did cook struggle
Actually, I'm not and I have not talked about his overall grade as a QB. I am placing the critique where it likely falls in greater measure. Cook was an average college QB. He struggled against better defenses. Because HE struggled, so too did the receivers. This is filed under the category of "duh" in most people's eyes.
If you ask people the following...
Did Burden make Cook better or did Cook make Burden look better?
Which do you think they would choose?
My overall claim is that Missouri, as an offense, showed too much inconsistency in both years and ESPECIALLY last year. Who's fault is that? Your claim seems to be that it is a talent problem. I think this is wrong. I think it comes from QB play and scheme. I think you would lose the poll on that one.
Again, take the Georgia game. Cook was 14/30 with two INTs and three sacks. Yet, Burden struggled? He took a 39 yard pass for a TD, but only had two balls after that. Burden is not in control who throws the ball. The reason why he "struggled" against stronger defenses is likely because the QB struggled against greater pressure both in accuracy and getting the ball out.
Again, my claim is that because Cook was an average QB who struggled against stronger defenses.