- Joined:
- Sep 15, 2012
- Posts:
- 64,497
- Liked Posts:
- 41,234
Signing a FA to hedge your bets on draft day because you're not sure who will be available makes sense. It makes less sense when you're sitting on the #3 pick in the draft and everyone knows a freak DE is going #1, and the team sitting at #2 has their eyes set on Kirk Cousins... but it still makes sense in theory....
Where your premise falls apart is at signing a never-was in Glennon to some $14/15M deal simply to hedge your bets on draft day. If you're looking for a 1 year stop-gap, I'm sorry, but that's just fucking Special person. Hoyer can fill that role for a fraction of the price.
First, Glennon is a has been that had a better rookie year than Carson Wentz.
Second, if the Niners sign Cousins then you have a point but since they haven't signed him yet you have no point. He is still franchised by the Skins.
Third, even if the Browns take Garett and the Skins sign Cousins then signing Glennon could still be an option if Pace has late 1st/2nd round grades on the QBs and so thinks all of them need time. In that scenario he can take the best of who is left in the 2nd round.
In short, while I prefer we take a QB at 3, that's because I have the top 3 as 1st round picks. Many people do no and so if you don't then getting a vet QB with some upside and waiting until the 2nd or 3rd round to get a QB is reasonable.
What do you disagree with that doesn't involve you making assumptions that are no more likely than mine?