- Joined:
- Apr 16, 2010
- Posts:
- 9,505
- Liked Posts:
- 1,733
Paul Pierce is far from a top defender and comparing bg to pp isn't right.
Point being, BG is an above average shooting guard and I think he will get back to it after the off year and surgery. Especially if Rip gets traded. I'd also rather have BG over Korver and Watson. I think a three guard linup of Rose, BG and Brewer would be one of the best in the league. Don't forget in 08/09, BG and Rose were one of the best backcourts in the league offensively.
Yeah, that's pretty much implied about what I said... if BG is a top 10-20 SG then obviously he's above average. Obviously having Ben Gordon would make the Bulls better, but I think the salary he demanded was too much, and he doesn't seem like a guy who is going to contribute in a big way to winning a championship any more than a guy like, say, B.J. Armstrong did. But B.J. didn't demand 30 mins. and $9M...
I think Pierce actually is one of the best defenders out there. He has a great combination of strength, height, and length. He wasn't very good when he first got in the league in 1999-ish. Nowadays there are only a couple other wing defenders I'd say are better:
Shane Battier- for sure
Thabo Sefolosha- for sure
Ron Artest- for sure
Tayshaun Prince
Gerald Wallace
Luol Deng? Trevor Ariza?
Last edited: