- Joined:
- May 15, 2010
- Posts:
- 5,024
- Liked Posts:
- 0
I have been trying to get a hold of the reason why critics are panning this movie. Did Columbia Pictures, Jon Liebesman, or Eckhart piss in someones coffee?
For one, it's a sci-fi film, two...its a action flick, three...it's awesome loud!
I of course have a lot of family who are or were in the military. The Corps were very well represented by this film. "Marines don't quit!"
Anyway, the cinematography was awesome and really thank Liebsman from not bending to the industry pressure to go 3D for this film.
In making the film, Liebsman was trying to catch the feel from movies like Saving Private Ryan, Black Hawk Down and United 93's documentary feel. So, that your seeing the action from the soldiers POV. Which he thought would be dangerous if it was converted to 3D.
{From Filmschoolrejects.com} interview:
My final question: There was a bit of talk that Battle may be post converted into 3D, is that happening?
No, no. It’s too handheld, and you’d throw up in two minutes
Would love to see this movie again!
I would like to see it again. So much action there was overload at the theater.
A definite must to see in the theater.