Nashville's new attempt at silencing Hawks fans

Sunbiz1

New member
Joined:
May 6, 2010
Posts:
6,543
Liked Posts:
1,721
You're correct.. And there was basically no moderation here until the CBMB came over here in August 2012.

In the early days, I wouldn't even log-in here w/o a very thick condom...place was hacked and spammed on a regular basis.:lol:

Someone payed the server bill, but that was it.

To All:

In other news, Preds desperately need new uniforms...they look like the Cleveland Browns.
 

Urblock

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Aug 21, 2012
Posts:
19,152
Liked Posts:
12,237
You're correct.. And there was basically no moderation here until the CBMB came over here in August 2012.
What? Don't blame us because we bring so much fun to the board.
 

Scoot26

Administrator
Staff member
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '20
Joined:
Jun 25, 2010
Posts:
41,333
Liked Posts:
28,434
So let me ask you something. Why does Grimson get banned (you said he was getting banned anyways) but The Hawk gets to stay with no punishment handed out? Excuse me for sounding like we're in 3rd Grade but The Hawk is the one who started with Grimson. Why is Grimson not allowed to defend himself without getting banned? Why is there a double standard here? It seems some posters (The Hawk, most of the packers fans) get special treatment and don't get banned at all while others get banned for silly things.

It's kind of like the NFL. Marshall gets fined for wearing green shoes, yet Rodgers and Brady don't get punished for diving, screaming at refs, taunting etc.

One day I would like to donate to this site but I can't do that until I know that the other posters and I will be treated fairly.
See PM.
 

Scoot26

Administrator
Staff member
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '20
Joined:
Jun 25, 2010
Posts:
41,333
Liked Posts:
28,434
What? Don't blame us because we bring so much fun to the board.
I don't blame all of you. For example, I like you. In general though CBMB brought a lot of problem children here and thus led to an increase in moderation.
 

Novak

Mod in Training/Fire Forum
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '21
Joined:
Sep 7, 2014
Posts:
16,106
Liked Posts:
12,189
Honestly, if Grim kept his shit in the hawks board Crys wouldn't have pulled the trigger. This isn't an isolated incident nor is grim some sort of saint. Sucks that he got banned but.. It was inevitable imo
 

Shantz My Pants

New member
Joined:
Dec 10, 2014
Posts:
3,923
Liked Posts:
787
Honestly, if Grim kept his shit in the hawks board Crys wouldn't have pulled the trigger. This isn't an isolated incident nor is grim some sort of saint. Sucks that he got banned but.. It was inevitable imo

Nobodies really disagreeing with that (I just saw his post in the Bar), but again, why does one party get the boot over the other? I mean, the standard looks like if I start going back and forth with someone, I've got a 50/50 chance of not getting a ban.


Sent from my Texas Instrument Calculator
 

Urblock

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Aug 21, 2012
Posts:
19,152
Liked Posts:
12,237
After I type something that makes me think it will get me banned I usually hit cancel.
 

Novak

Mod in Training/Fire Forum
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '21
Joined:
Sep 7, 2014
Posts:
16,106
Liked Posts:
12,189
Nobodies really disagreeing with that (I just saw his post in the Bar), but again, why does one party get the boot over the other? I mean, the standard looks like if I start going back and forth with someone, I've got a 50/50 chance of not getting a ban.


Sent from my Texas Instrument Calculator

Grims been banned 6 (now 7) times, 9 if you count the partial board bans. I think he lost the benefit of the doubt a while ago.

IMO, mods were looking for any reason to ban. He was considered a problem by them, and it was apparent. As soon as he gave them a reason, he got the axe..
 

Shantz My Pants

New member
Joined:
Dec 10, 2014
Posts:
3,923
Liked Posts:
787
Grims been banned 6 (now 7) times, 9 if you count the partial board bans. I think he lost the benefit of the doubt a while ago.

IMO, mods were looking for any reason to ban. He was considered a problem by them, and it was apparent. As soon as he gave them a reason, he got the axe..

Which is fine, but you gotta hold everyone accountable if you are going to over mod. Again, investing in another site is fine, but you have to be quite upfront and fair to all parties. Rush bought out IHN and took away what many of us appreciated about the site to conform to the certain peons here; Which was not what was advertised to us at the beginning.

Had we known this was going to happen we wouldn't have moved here and would of made our own simple Hawks forum on some cheap site and done our own thing.


Sent from my Texas Instrument Calculator
 

Novak

Mod in Training/Fire Forum
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '21
Joined:
Sep 7, 2014
Posts:
16,106
Liked Posts:
12,189
Which is fine, but you gotta hold everyone accountable if you are going to over mod. Again, investing in another site is fine, but you have to be quite upfront and fair to all parties. Rush bought out IHN and took away what many of us appreciated about the site to conform to the certain peons here; Which was not what was advertised to us at the beginning.

Had we known this was going to happen we wouldn't have moved here and would of made our own simple Hawks forum on some cheap site and done our own thing.


Sent from my Texas Instrument Calculator

All fair points.. The way things have been run around here lately has been questionable at best...
 

Novak

Mod in Training/Fire Forum
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '21
Joined:
Sep 7, 2014
Posts:
16,106
Liked Posts:
12,189
After I type something that makes me think it will get me banned I usually hit cancel.

You should post some of your darker thoughts. Fwiw, I won't ban you
 

Novak

Mod in Training/Fire Forum
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '21
Joined:
Sep 7, 2014
Posts:
16,106
Liked Posts:
12,189
Dmelt, you're the man. Get recked hawk and desp

:hawkbang:
 

Mitchapalooza

Guest
Honestly, if Grim kept his shit in the hawks board Crys wouldn't have pulled the trigger. This isn't an isolated incident nor is grim some sort of saint. Sucks that he got banned but.. It was inevitable imo
**** that. Free Grimson. Down with the mods. Go baers
 

Shantz My Pants

New member
Joined:
Dec 10, 2014
Posts:
3,923
Liked Posts:
787
I do like the site here and the posters, especially the amount of posts and different opinions. I don't like the over moderation, especially in the Hawks forum where most of us were told it was going to be like IHN and when non hawk board regulars jump in and light fires we get the boot because we go overboard. Fucking either shit or get off the pot.

Here's an idea:
Since this part of the boards has seen more than the usual mods around, why not just give the parties a 12-24 hour ban, make sure it's known why they got the ban, and we all move on and cooler heads prevail?


Sent from my Texas Instrument Calculator
 

Shantz My Pants

New member
Joined:
Dec 10, 2014
Posts:
3,923
Liked Posts:
787
So let me ask you something. Why does Grimson get banned (you said he was getting banned anyways) but The Hawk gets to stay with no punishment handed out? Excuse me for sounding like we're in 3rd Grade but The Hawk is the one who started with Grimson. Why is Grimson not allowed to defend himself without getting banned? Why is there a double standard here? It seems some posters (The Hawk, most of the packers fans) get special treatment and don't get banned at all while others get banned for silly things.

It's kind of like the NFL. Marshall gets fined for wearing green shoes, yet Rodgers and Brady don't get punished for diving, screaming at refs, taunting etc.

One day I would like to donate to this site but I can't do that until I know that the other posters and I will be treated fairly.

I thought about donating as well, though I was waiting a bit to see how things shook out with us IHN guys before pulling that trigger.


Sent from my Texas Instrument Calculator
 

MassHavoc

Moderator
Staff member
Joined:
May 14, 2010
Posts:
17,843
Liked Posts:
2,550
I do like the site here and the posters, especially the amount of posts and different opinions. I don't like the over moderation, especially in the Hawks forum where most of us were told it was going to be like IHN and when non hawk board regulars jump in and light fires we get the boot because we go overboard. Fucking either shit or get off the pot.

Here's an idea:
Since this part of the boards has seen more than the usual mods around, why not just give the parties a 12-24 hour ban, make sure it's known why they got the ban, and we all move on and cooler heads prevail?


Sent from my Texas Instrument Calculator

While I don't disagree with you Trev... I'm not sure I have seen the over modderation in this forum really? What do you mean? The only real moderation we've done has been with Grimson and that's the same as IHN. Unless I'm forgetting something. Other than that this forum has been pretty untouched, I know I"m too lazy to really do anything.
 

Shantz My Pants

New member
Joined:
Dec 10, 2014
Posts:
3,923
Liked Posts:
787
While I don't disagree with you Trev... I'm not sure I have seen the over modderation in this forum really? What do you mean? The only real moderation we've done has been with Grimson and that's the same as IHN. Unless I'm forgetting something. Other than that this forum has been pretty untouched, I know I"m too lazy to really do anything.

Coming from IHN, any site I guess could be over moderated.

Over moderated might be the wrong term, but what is considered a ban able offense here wasn't much of a blip on the radar before. Plus, the consistency sucks.


Sent from my Texas Instrument Calculator
 

MassHavoc

Moderator
Staff member
Joined:
May 14, 2010
Posts:
17,843
Liked Posts:
2,550
Coming from IHN, any site I guess could be over moderated.

Over moderated might be the wrong term, but what is considered a ban able offense here wasn't much of a blip on the radar before. Plus, the consistency sucks.


Sent from my Texas Instrument Calculator
Understood. A discussion I'm trying to have for sure.
 

Top