- Joined:
- Aug 21, 2012
- Posts:
- 9,792
- Liked Posts:
- 14,400
My favorite teams
Idiot. That would be the Rams tanking effecting that pick. Not the Lions tanking. Which is what I was responding to.
??
Idiot. That would be the Rams tanking effecting that pick. Not the Lions tanking. Which is what I was responding to.
??
- Joined:
- Nov 27, 2014
- Posts:
- 20,516
- Liked Posts:
- 4,867
You really aren't that bright are you? Everyone else understood exactly what i was saying, you on the other hand don't have a clue.Idiot. That would be the Rams tanking effecting that pick. Not the Lions tanking. Which is what I was responding to.
??
JoJoBoxer
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Aug 14, 2010
- Posts:
- 12,415
- Liked Posts:
- 7,609
Maybe that makes them desperate, and they trade the farm to move up to #2 and get their franchise QB, that is if everything falls the Bears way
- Joined:
- Nov 27, 2014
- Posts:
- 20,516
- Liked Posts:
- 4,867
Will Anderson at #3, book it!
- Joined:
- Jun 20, 2010
- Posts:
- 40,303
- Liked Posts:
- 29,936
- Location:
- In the mod forum planning your ban
Do they?
- Joined:
- Aug 21, 2012
- Posts:
- 1,707
- Liked Posts:
- 626
All those picks and we give up two... I'm sold on this.
- Joined:
- Aug 21, 2012
- Posts:
- 9,792
- Liked Posts:
- 14,400
My favorite teams
I wasn't talking to you, moron. So its you whos confused on the context of the reply. I dont give a shit what you were saying, I didn't quote you or aim that comment at you.
He said the Lions and Bears would try to outtank each other, I told him the low pick isn't the Lions original pick, it depends on the Rams
Now stfu
- Joined:
- Nov 27, 2014
- Posts:
- 20,516
- Liked Posts:
- 4,867
Ok Sphagetti brain. Here is the thing:
1) If the Lions allowed the Bears to win (tank), would it or would in not have the Rams leap frog the Bears in draft order?
2) And how does that depend on the Rams?
I'm simply pointing out that the Lions tanking or not tanking has no effect on that pick
Now get a clue, and admit you were wrong.
- Joined:
- Aug 21, 2012
- Posts:
- 9,792
- Liked Posts:
- 14,400
My favorite teams
The Lions tanking has no effect on the Rams pick that they acquired moron. So the Bears and Lions aren't going to try to out tank each other. The position of that pick depends on the Rams record.
Now shut the **** up and disappear for months again like you always do when the Lions are losing
- Joined:
- Aug 20, 2012
- Posts:
- 34,394
- Liked Posts:
- 26,574
- Location:
- Any-Town, USA
My favorite teams
If the Bears trade with Seattle, they would still pick in front of the Lions
- Joined:
- Nov 27, 2014
- Posts:
- 20,516
- Liked Posts:
- 4,867
I am seeing now that they have reshuffled the Rams and Seahawks, what happened, SOS adjustments?
Doesn't matter, the premise of this thread was the Lions (via the Rams) held the #3 pick. Any and all of my comments are based on that.
But the Rams and Seahawks play each other twice yet.
Last edited:
- Joined:
- Nov 27, 2014
- Posts:
- 20,516
- Liked Posts:
- 4,867
LMAO. You are so clueless. If the Bears and Rams are both at 3 wins, and the Lions let the Bears beat them on Jan 1, that would mean the Bears would then have 4 wins. If the Bears have 4 wins, and the Rams have three wins, who picks first, Sphagetti brain? So yes, the Lions purposely losing that game most assuredly would have an effect on that pick
- Joined:
- Aug 20, 2012
- Posts:
- 60,610
- Liked Posts:
- 53,865
the lions are letting the bears win?
- Joined:
- Nov 27, 2014
- Posts:
- 20,516
- Liked Posts:
- 4,867
What part of "if" gives you this confusion?
- Joined:
- Aug 20, 2012
- Posts:
- 60,610
- Liked Posts:
- 53,865
Didn't know letting the other team win was a thing.
- Joined:
- Nov 27, 2014
- Posts:
- 20,516
- Liked Posts:
- 4,867
Isn't that what "tanking" is?
gobullschi
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Jun 30, 2010
- Posts:
- 926
- Liked Posts:
- 653
- Location:
- Chicago
IMO, the best package the Bears would get if only trading down one spot is a 3rd and a 2024 1st. Expecting anything more than that is just destined for disappointment.
- Joined:
- Aug 23, 2012
- Posts:
- 13,257
- Liked Posts:
- 3,998
if the Lions really want to go QB, AND Have to surrender 2 1sts, they probably call Houston in the hopes of acquiring Bryce Young or stay at 3 and select Revis or Stroud and keep their picks
TL1961
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Apr 24, 2013
- Posts:
- 36,053
- Liked Posts:
- 19,920
They have two very talented receivers and are in need of their future quarterback. Adding Bryce Young or CJ Stroud and their receivers they would be set up well offensively for a long time.
They absolutely could be interested in jumping on that option. And regardless of how many holes a team has to fill, they cannot afford to pass on an opportunity to get their future quarterback. It’s hard to be in a position to get the right guy at quarterback and you have to take that opportunity.
I’m not suggesting this particular package is anything close to a sure thing. I am saying that Detroit would absolutely be in the market for a quarterback regardless of how many other holes they have.