New Quade thread.. only intelligent posts please

poodski

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 18, 2010
Posts:
3,276
Liked Posts:
680
no no no, i doubt quade will fall asleep in the dugout. :)

If I managed a team (Cubs especially because of all the days games), I almost guarantee I would have a hangover so bad at least once I would fall asleep.
 

DewsSox79

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 24, 2010
Posts:
29,059
Liked Posts:
7,249
If I managed a team (Cubs especially because of all the days games), I almost guarantee I would have a hangover so bad at least once I would fall asleep.

lol same here. hell i may miss a game hitting snoooze
 

Lex L.

New member
Joined:
Apr 21, 2010
Posts:
2,301
Liked Posts:
253
Ok guys,

I know that hiring a manager for a rebuilding team is a hot topic issue :)rolleyes:)
but the name calling and attacks need to stop...this is the second straight thread that this has happened....Lex, calm down dude....

NO MORE! :shifty:

The stupidity in this thread is personally offensive to me.

Just look at it. From the very top, the thread title asks for intelligent discussion. Right out of the gate, theyre talking about eye brows. You have some lonely sox fans in here picking fights with pro-sandberg people. You have people who were specifically identified for only liking Quade because they want to be different from the "stupid" cubs fans, not being able to provide a reason for why Quade should be the manager, without saying, "he's not Sandberg". And this was supposed to be intelligent discussion? What a joke.
 
Last edited:

tbo41fan

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 26, 2010
Posts:
15,922
Liked Posts:
2,701
Location:
Chicago, IL
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Fire
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Arizona Wildcats
why is it stupidity? because they dont agree with you?
 

tbo41fan

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 26, 2010
Posts:
15,922
Liked Posts:
2,701
Location:
Chicago, IL
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Fire
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Arizona Wildcats
Thats nothing new. When that question is asked, never assume theyre talking to you.

this is why the last thread got closed...your attacking them for no reason...

no need to insult people
 

DewsSox79

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 24, 2010
Posts:
29,059
Liked Posts:
7,249
The stupidity in this thread is personally offensive to me.

Just look at it. From the very top, the thread title asks for intelligent discussion. Right out of the gate, theyre talking about eye brows. You have some lonely sox fans in here picking fights with pro-sandberg people. You have people who were specifically identified for only liking Quade because they want to be different from the "stupid" cubs fans, not being able to provide a reason for why Quade should be the manager, without saying, "he's not Sandberg". And this was supposed to be intelligent discussion? What a joke.

it has been stated quite a few times, from me see my business approach post. but i will explain again because for some reason you skip the posts.

1) quade has more experience than ryno
2) quade comes cheap (see business side of it )
3) quade has worked with alot of young players for a long time

just because he is a hall of fame player, does not mean he will be a hall of fame manager. he needs a little bit more seasoning and it would be best served in a small market.
 

Lex L.

New member
Joined:
Apr 21, 2010
Posts:
2,301
Liked Posts:
253
why is it stupidity? because they dont agree with you?

No because its a bunch of nothing comments. You ask why is Quade qualified to be manager and someone comes back with, "because he's not Sandberg" types of answers. Thats not answering the question. And that question has still not been answered. The only follow up to this has been some sox fan running interference.

You have people talking about eyebrows immediately after insisting on intelligent posts.

You have people who dont know the pros and cons of bunting.

You have people making stupid blanket statements about bunting.

You have people saying overbunting is bunting too much...which is like saying overcooking is cooking something too much. Yeah, no kidding.
 

Lex L.

New member
Joined:
Apr 21, 2010
Posts:
2,301
Liked Posts:
253
it has been stated quite a few times, from me see my business approach post. but i will explain again because for some reason you skip the posts.

1) quade has more experience than ryno
2) quade comes cheap (see business side of it )
3) quade has worked with alot of young players for a long time

just because he is a hall of fame player, does not mean he will be a hall of fame manager. he needs a little bit more seasoning and it would be best served in a small market.

Youre personna non grata. Nothing I ask in the Cubs forum is directed at you. You have nothing to add.

And that you would actually refer to what youve previously stated as though it means something is absolutely laughable. You should start a "Tell Someone Who Cares" newsletter. Im sure youd trying to pawn it off on Cubs fans.

For someone who talks trash about Cubs fans, you sure are clingy.
 

USCChiFan

Crow's Nest
Donator
Joined:
Apr 16, 2010
Posts:
8,003
Liked Posts:
1,105
Location:
Behind you
No because its a bunch of nothing comments. You ask why is Quade qualified to be manager and someone comes back with, "because he's not Sandberg" types of answers. Thats not answering the question. And that question has still not been answered. The only follow up to this has been some sox fan running interference.

You have people talking about eyebrows immediately after insisting on intelligent posts.

You have people who dont know the pros and cons of bunting.

You have people making stupid blanket statements about bunting.

You have people saying overbunting is bunting too much...which is like saying overcooking is cooking something too much. Yeah, no kidding.
Sandberg DOES attempt to bunt in a game too much. I have been to several Iowa Cubs games and he loves to play mostly old-school small ball too much. I can understand playing small ball for a small stretch, but when you rely too much on trying to move a runner w/ a bunt, or having the base runner run on contact, you are going to run into more outs which will cause you to score a substantial amount of less runs. Also, just because he has a relationship w/ the players doesn't mean he can evaluate talent, develop players, handle a pitching staff and a bullpen, and consistently put out a good lineup.

The Cubs are likely going to go into a rebuilding phase, and why have Sandberg manage a losing team and tarnish his reputation as a manager? IMO it'd be better to have Sandberg when the team is more established and has more talent and can field a winning team.

As for the "fan favorite" aspect of hiring Sandberg, I'd like to point you to this article:
http://sports.yahoo.com/mlb/blog/bi...erg-might-bring-unwanted-pain-?urn=mlb-257784

Trammell was a fan favorite in Detroit, but even he was booed by the fans when the Tigers consistently lost, and Sandberg could go through the same thing
 
Last edited:

Jntg4

Fire Forum Moderator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 26, 2010
Posts:
26,017
Liked Posts:
3,297
Location:
Minnesota
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago White Sox
  2. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Fire
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Chicago State Cougars
  2. DePaul Blue Demons
  3. Illinois-Chicago Flames
  4. Loyola Ramblers
  5. Northern Illinois Huskies
  6. Northwestern Wildcats
I think Lex needs to be banned. That's probably the most intelligent post in this topic :). But its also the post that has the highest chance of getting me banned in this topic.
 

Lex L.

New member
Joined:
Apr 21, 2010
Posts:
2,301
Liked Posts:
253
Sandberg DOES attempt to bunt in a game too much. I have been to several Iowa Cubs games and he loves to play mostly old-school small ball too much. I can understand playing small ball for a small stretch, but when you rely too much on trying to move a runner w/ a bunt, or having the base runner run on contact, you are going to run into more outs which will cause you to score a substantial amount of less runs. Also, just because he has a relationship w/ the players doesn't mean he can evaluate talent, develop players, handle a pitching staff and a bullpen, and consistently put out a good lineup.

What makes it too much?


The Cubs are likely going to go into a rebuilding phase, and why have Sandberg manage a losing team and tarnish his reputation as a manager? IMO it'd be better to have Sandberg when the team is more established and has more talent and can field a winning team.

Sorry but youre contradicting yourself here. Emphasizing fundamentals like bunting and execution is actually good for a young team. Since when do established players buy into bunting. Some do but its not a certainty and bringing in a manager after theyre more established is backwards.


Trammell was a fan favorite in Detroit, but even he was booed by the fans when the Tigers consistently lost, and Sandberg could go through the same thing

So then dont string him along. Why let him manage in the minors if youre not going to give him the keys to that car?
 

Top