Next Manager Discussion Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.

brett05

867-5309
Joined:
Apr 28, 2009
Posts:
27,226
Liked Posts:
4,579
Location:
Hell
Great article in the Tribune today indicating that this hire seems like mistake #2 and isn't invigorating anyone.

Sent from my SCH-I200 using Tapatalk
 

chibears55

Well-known member
Joined:
Apr 18, 2013
Posts:
13,554
Liked Posts:
1,915
Ken Rosenthal reported that Lovullo will interview with the Cubs early this week..

with just the Mariners spot left to contend with, and they want to interview lovullo over just hiring renteria now..
my guess is that Lovullo is choice number one and Renteria is choice number 2.
 

CSF77

Well-known member
Joined:
Apr 16, 2013
Posts:
18,667
Liked Posts:
2,845
Location:
San Diego
CHICAGO -- Expect a new Cubs manager to be revealed this week. All that's known so far is who it won't be.

Brad Ausmus, who interviewed Friday with the Cubs, has reportedly been hired as the Tigers' next manager. Ausmus was the sixth candidate to talk to Theo Epstein, Cubs president of baseball operations.

On Tuesday, former Indians and Mariners manager Eric Wedge, 45, met with Epstein and the front office to discuss the vacant manager's job. The Cubs also have interviewed Rick Renteria, A.J. Hinch, Dave Martinez and Manny Acta.

The Cubs also are expected to interview Red Sox bench coach Torey Lovullo, 48, this week, according to FOX Sports and MLB Network's Ken Rosenthal. Epstein hired Lovullo to manage the Red Sox's Triple-A Pawtucket team in 2010.

Lovullo also managed in the Indians' Minor League system. He interviewed for the Dodgers' job in 2006 and Boston's managerial opening prior to '12, when the Red Sox hired Bobby Valentine.

In an October interview with Fangraphs, Lovullo said the Boston approach has been to be "very dynamic." Epstein has said he wants someone who is creative and communicates well.

"What we've done here is create an environment that these guys have bought into," Lovullo said in the Fangraphs interview. "We might be asking for something in April you won't see again until August. But these guys will be ready to execute it, and understand it, because we talked about it and believe in it. We want to be dynamic. We want to be able to switch roles if we need to, and score a run a different way than a three-run home run."

The only deadline Epstein has set is to have someone in place by Nov. 11, when the General Manager Meetings are held. Dale Sveum was dimissed on Sept. 30 after two seasons as the Cubs manager.

Cubs general manager Jed Hoyer hired Ausmus as a special assistant with the Padres in November 2010, when Hoyer was the GM in San Diego, and Ausmus was the third person with a San Diego connection to interview for the Chicago job. Renteria, 51, who also interviewed with the Mariners and Tigers, is the Padres' bench coach. Hinch, 39, is currently involved with player development in the Padres' front office.

Epstein has said he wants someone with managerial experience, which Ausmus lacked. Ausmus played for 18 seasons, but his only time as a manager was with Team Israel in a qualifying tournament for the World Baseball Classic.

Renteria does not have any time in the big leagues as a manager, but he has worked in the Minor Leagues, beginning in 1998, as manager in the Marlins organization with the Class A Brevard County team. He left the Marlins system after managing in Double-A in 2001, and he was a hitting coach for the Padres' Class A Lake Elsinore Minor League team in '03.

In 2004, Renteria took over as Lake Elsinore's manager, and after three seasons, he moved up to manage Triple-A Portland. Renteria joined the Padres' Major League staff in '08, and he has been San Diego's bench coach since '11. He also managed Team Mexico in the World Baseball Classic this year.

Wedge, 45, was the American League manager of the year in 2007, when the Indians won 96 games and finished first in the AL Central. He compiled a 561-573 record in Cleveland but was dismissed after a 97-loss season in '09. Wedge had been the Mariners' manager since '11, posting a 213-273 record, but he parted ways with the club at the end of the season. He also missed 27 games this year after suffering a minor stroke.

Martinez, 49, the only candidate who played for the Cubs, has been the Rays' bench coach the last six seasons. Acta, 44, managed the Nationals (2007-09) and Indians ('10-12).

Carrie Muskat is a reporter for MLB.com. She writes a blog, Muskat Ramblings, and you can follow her on Twitter @CarrieMuskat. This story was not subject to the approval of Major League Baseball or its clubs.

http://mlb.mlb.com/news/article/chc...md=20131103&content_id=63649028&vkey=news_chc
 

SilenceS

Moderator
Staff member
Donator
Joined:
Apr 16, 2013
Posts:
21,848
Liked Posts:
9,042
Well get your engines reving. From reports, the cubs are supposed to announce renteria as the next Chicago cubs manager Tom.
 

chibears55

Well-known member
Joined:
Apr 18, 2013
Posts:
13,554
Liked Posts:
1,915
Well get your engines reving. From reports, the cubs are supposed to announce renteria as the next Chicago cubs manager Tom.

not a surprise.. they wanted girardi, he stayed in Newyork .... we may never know but Lovullo mightve been their 2nd choice and they never had a chance with him...
so, they end up with renteria who is suppose to be very good with coaching the young kids, we shall see how ithat turns out and see how he manages..
 

dabynsky

Fringe Average Mod
Donator
Joined:
May 17, 2010
Posts:
13,947
Liked Posts:
3,118
I am fully prepared to not care about this hiring. Hopefully he is good at developing players but so much of what a manager does is behind the scenes that it will be next to impossible to tell if he was a good choice or not.
 

TL1961

Well-known member
Joined:
Apr 24, 2013
Posts:
34,927
Liked Posts:
19,055
It may be easy to understand why the Red Sox feel they need to screw the Cubs, but I I am Lovullo, I am asking them right now why they fell they should screw me out of what could be a great opportunity.

Why would they do that to an employee? Unless they're just total D-bags. (And don't tell me the D-bags play in Arizona! Rimshot, please.)

As for Renteria, I am not upset with this move. i don't know enough about him to be thrilled or ticked off. Let's give him a fair shot.
 

Boobaby1

New member
Joined:
Apr 18, 2013
Posts:
2,236
Liked Posts:
1,180
As for Renteria, I am not upset with this move. i don't know enough about him to be thrilled or ticked off. Let's give him a fair shot.

It is a little funny that the Cubs hired an injured manager. :smug2:
 

SilenceS

Moderator
Staff member
Donator
Joined:
Apr 16, 2013
Posts:
21,848
Liked Posts:
9,042
It may be easy to understand why the Red Sox feel they need to screw the Cubs, but I I am Lovullo, I am asking them right now why they fell they should screw me out of what could be a great opportunity.

Why would they do that to an employee? Unless they're just total D-bags. (And don't tell me the D-bags play in Arizona! Rimshot, please.)

As for Renteria, I am not upset with this move. i don't know enough about him to be thrilled or ticked off. Let's give him a fair shot.

Well, the deal was that Theo is not allowed to take any Boston employees for 3 years. Boston didn't forget the clause. The Cubs somehow did.
 

TL1961

Well-known member
Joined:
Apr 24, 2013
Posts:
34,927
Liked Posts:
19,055
Well, the deal was that Theo is not allowed to take any Boston employees for 3 years. Boston didn't forget the clause. The Cubs somehow did.

They didn't "take" anybody. They asked permission, as any team must do to talk to a guy under contract. Regardless of the "contract" between cubs and Bosox, ANY team must ask permission, and ANY team can be denied.
 

SilenceS

Moderator
Staff member
Donator
Joined:
Apr 16, 2013
Posts:
21,848
Liked Posts:
9,042
They didn't "take" anybody. They asked permission, as any team must do to talk to a guy under contract. Regardless of the "contract" between cubs and Bosox, ANY team must ask permission, and ANY team can be denied.

What? They asked permission to talk to him. You are correct. Boston said no because they negotiated a three year clause that no Boston employee could be hired by the Cubs and Theo Epstein. They never let it get that far because it was in the contract. What are you capitalizing words for like you made some point? If the Cubs knew they couldn't hire anyone from Boston, then what would be the point of asking permission. The Cubs must have forgot about the clause, but the Red Sox did not. Boston did no wrong here. They stuck to the agreed upon contract that the Cubs signed as well.
 

CSF77

Well-known member
Joined:
Apr 16, 2013
Posts:
18,667
Liked Posts:
2,845
Location:
San Diego
We don't even know who would be better out of the two of them. It wont matter until the talent arrives. Up until then this team is going to suck.

With that said Rick feels like a stepping stone to get the new wave in transition. Not sure if he is the guy that takes them past that. So keeping that in mind having a manager that can relate to Soler, Baez and the heavier Hispanic movement makes perfect sense right now. More so than a manager that may take those players later on.

Who knows Rick may end up being that guy.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top