- Joined:
- Aug 10, 2013
- Posts:
- 41,020
- Liked Posts:
- 38,369
- Location:
- Cumming
I think he gets a 5th at best. Maybe a future 4th, unlikely thoughOf course they would take that. Unfortunately I doubt very much his trade value is anything close to that.
I think he gets a 5th at best. Maybe a future 4th, unlikely thoughOf course they would take that. Unfortunately I doubt very much his trade value is anything close to that.
I didn't have him as even a top 5 receiver.I know the Jags paid a lot, maybe too much, but he's one of the best WRs (if not the best) and the best corner. He'd have been a top-10 if he was exclusive to either; instead he's a top 10 at both. The question will be can he stay healthy.
Agreed. I was really hoping they'd trade back after jeanty went to the raidersThere was not a top 20 worthy OT available at 10. Loveland was the #5 prospect per NFL.com Not in love with the pick but the 1st 9 went about as bad as possible for the Bears.
Nope. Drafting Loveland could mean a whole lot of things, we don't know. Just postulating something. Sorry for insulting you though or something.Been reading up on the fanboy blogs where they've been pumping up Amegadjie have you?
At this point Kmet is on the block. 4th might do it.
I don’t care. They are different players and one has nothing to do with the other.LaPorta wasn't blue chip either.............................
He is not. Bears will be using 2 TE setsAt this point Kmet is on the block. 4th might do it.
Go check which offense had the least yards in the NFL last season genius.The Bears didnt have the worst offense in the league. Not sure where you read your stats from.
Not true. And Loveland aint some amazing blocker eitherThen he doesn't really offer much in terms of mismatches. When you can put Loveland in-line and get some quality blocking or move him out to the perimeter and be able to win matchups, you have something. Otherwise, why not just draft another receiver and play a bunch of 3 WR sets?
Maybe or maybe the Colts had him as the top TE as well. Spilt milk now but feel free to cry about it until Sept and then it will be decided on the field.Says the guy with the most meatball takes on the entire forum
Bro, you're an absolute tool. I don't give a **** about your shitty football takes
They probably could've traded back and STILL got Loveland
Agreed. I think it would be a 5th.I think he gets a 5th at best. Maybe a future 4th, unlikely though
Who was going to trade up to 11? What's happened since then backs that up. Walker slide to #15, the Colts saw Warren still available. No QBs worth moving up for.Agreed. I was really hoping they'd trade back after jeanty went to the raiders
That doesnt mean you have the worst offense genius.Go check which offense had the least yards in the NFL last season genius.
6-6, 248 with 10 inch hands is not really undersized. He is taller with bigger hands than Warren and 8 pounds lighter.Only so many balls to go around. Kmet is now a 13 million dollar blocking TE. I guess Johnson really values those slightly undersized hybrid TE types.
It's an interesting postulation given that Amegadjie was awful last year and it was almost universally agreed upon at the end of the year.Nope. Drafting Loveland could mean a whole lot of things, we don't know. Just postulating something. Sorry for insulting you though or something.
So the offense that gained the least yards isn't the worst, and the defense that gave up the least isn't the best.That doesnt mean you have the worst offense genius.
You probably aren't smart enough (correction you aren't smart enough) to understand DVOA or other advanced metrics but I'm not going to even bother.
Loveland is a good enough athlete to flex out to receiver in spots, too. He synchronizes with Kmet really well.He is not. Bears will be using 2 TE sets