O.J Howard at #3?

[satchice]

So, fans would rather have O.J. Howard then a Mike Williams or a Corey Davis?

Weird right. In the fact is we are weaker at wide receiver then at tightened


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[iueyedoc]

Adam Hoge Mock Draft 3.0

1. TE O.J Howard
2. CB Adoree Jackson
3. FS Justin Evans
4. OLB Tarrell Bashem
4. WR Josh Reynolds
5. OT Dan Skipper
7. K Zane Gonzalez

I like your 24 days out mock better, and that one made me queasy.

 

[nc0gnet0]

Personally yes.

I think he is a far more unique athlete to those players.

OJ howard

receptions 45 yards 595 average 13.2 long 68 td's 3

Corey davis

receptions 97 yards 1500 average 15.5 long 70 Td's 19

Mike Williams

receptions 98 yards 1361 average 13.9 long 50 Td's 11

Sprinkle in the fact the Bears just signed a tight end to a 3 year 18 mil contract, and I respectfully disagree

I could care less about the underwear derby

[video]https://cdn0.vox-cdn.com/thumbor/FvB6VEYm7U8fN-fs01qk7-gzWzo=/0x0:507x300/920x0/filters:focal(0x0:507x300):gifv():no_upscale()/cdn2.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/7737567/puntpass.0.gif[/video]

 

[iueyedoc]

Hell, I'd say there is a 50% chance Howard isn't even the best TE in this class, maybe not even the second best. And I would bet good money he will not be anything near the offensive rookie of the year like you would expect the 3rd pick and 1st offensive player to be if he were picked there.

This discussion is really moot because the is zero chance they take him at #3, trade down maybe, but #3, never.

 

[nc0gnet0]

Hell, I'd say there is a 50% chance Howard isn't even the best TE in this class, maybe not even the second best. And I would bet good money he will not be anything near the offensive rookie of the year like you would expect the 3rd pick and 1st offensive player to be if he were picked there.

This discussion is really moot because the is zero chance they take him at #3, trade down maybe, but #3, never.

If I could thank this post 10 times I would......

 

[PeterMbangala]

Weird right. In the fact is we are weaker at wide receiver then at tightened


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

We are garbage at both so current depth would not be something I would even consider.