**OFFICAIL** Bears 2024 Regular Season News & Schleisse - FTO Preferred - No ALTS! Derailing Is Discouraged!

gallagher

gallagher

Ave Atque Vale
Donator
Joined:
Sep 27, 2010
Posts:
7,982
Liked Posts:
7,078
Location:
Of Semi-Fixed Address
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Michigan Wolverines
  2. Ohio Bobcats
playthrough2001 said:
https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1673163288807370754
Click to expand...

Moore can get open in a short space, which is going to put more DBs on their heels, giving Fields more opportunities to test the defender's cardio fitness.

I am hoping that his overall running total goes down because he isn't buying time and running away from pressure. But RPOs are going to be a whole lot easier when linebackers and safeties have to respect the pass, and Fields will have more big runs that cracks the opposing defense like this one here.
 
Nelly

Nelly

Well-known member
Joined:
Mar 13, 2018
Posts:
7,444
Liked Posts:
8,668

bears51/40

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 21, 2012
Posts:
4,915
Liked Posts:
3,945
Bearly said:
I get it and wasn't happy with his play either but you never hit on them all and you hope that a pencil gets sharper with a another year here. Rookies get more than 1 year to show themselves unless they've already proven that they do or don't belong before that.
Click to expand...
Even as a rookie VJJ was productive.............if you look at the total yards, he produced for the Bears last year.
 
remydat

remydat

CCS Hall of Fame
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '19
Joined:
Sep 15, 2012
Posts:
64,235
Liked Posts:
40,983
nc0gnet0 said:
Romeo Okwara
2020Detroit Lions163927121011

Paschal barely played his rookie year, recovering from a sports hernia
Click to expand...

Romeo has been dead for 2 years now. I would not start a guy that has played 9 out of a possible 34 games. And tough shit on Paschal. He has shown nothing in the NFL to warrant starting over Gipson. Injuries matter jackass.

nc0gnet0 said:
(but I don't) means it is implied, FFS (or for ****'s sake, for your benefit)
Click to expand...

No it isnt implied. You just made that up to account for the fact the statment is stupid as is.
 
nc0gnet0

nc0gnet0

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Nov 27, 2014
Posts:
20,002
Liked Posts:
4,825
remydat said:
Romeo has been dead for 2 years now. I would not start a guy that has played 9 out of a possible 34 games. And tough shit on Paschal. He has shown nothing in the NFL to warrant starting over Gipson. Injuries matter jackass.



No it isnt implied. You just made that up to account for the fact the statment is stupid as is.
Click to expand...

Trevis Gipson | Seattle Seahawks ED | NFL and PFF stats

NFL and PFF player stats for Seattle Seahawks ED Trevis Gipson on Pro Football Focus.
www.pff.com www.pff.com

48.9 pathetic.

Romeo Okwara | Detroit Lions ED | NFL and PFF stats

NFL and PFF player stats for Detroit Lions ED Romeo Okwara on Pro Football Focus.
www.pff.com www.pff.com

Over three years, never that pathetically low.

Josh Paschal | Detroit Lions ED | NFL and PFF stats

NFL and PFF player stats for Detroit Lions ED Josh Paschal on Pro Football Focus.
www.pff.com www.pff.com

Still better than Gibson
 
remydat

remydat

CCS Hall of Fame
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '19
Joined:
Sep 15, 2012
Posts:
64,235
Liked Posts:
40,983
nc0gnet0 said:

Trevis Gipson | Seattle Seahawks ED | NFL and PFF stats

NFL and PFF player stats for Seattle Seahawks ED Trevis Gipson on Pro Football Focus.
www.pff.com www.pff.com

48.9 pathetic.

Romeo Okwara | Detroit Lions ED | NFL and PFF stats

NFL and PFF player stats for Detroit Lions ED Romeo Okwara on Pro Football Focus.
www.pff.com www.pff.com

Over three years, never that pathetically low.

Josh Paschal | Detroit Lions ED | NFL and PFF stats

NFL and PFF player stats for Detroit Lions ED Josh Paschal on Pro Football Focus.
www.pff.com www.pff.com

Still better than Gibson
Click to expand...

Still missed 25 out of 34 games so his grades are meaningless until he proves he can stay healthy.

Gipson had a 70.4 grade in 2021 and 7 sacks. Paschal doesnt have enough reps for his 55 grade (also pathetic) and 2 sacks to tell us shit. You act like he had a great grade. It was shit too so Gipsons 70.4 grade at least means he has played well in the NFL.

Now let's here your bullshit about how a 55 grade is so great because it is a Lions player.
 
nc0gnet0

nc0gnet0

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Nov 27, 2014
Posts:
20,002
Liked Posts:
4,825
remydat said:
Still missed 25 out of 34 games so his grades are meaningless until he proves he can stay healthy.

Gipson had a 70.4 grade in 2021 and 7 sacks. Paschal doesnt have enough reps for his 55 grade (also pathetic) and 2 sacks to tell us shit. You act like he had a great grade. It was shit too so Gipsons 70.4 grade at least means he has played well in the NFL.

Now let's here your bullshit about how a 55 grade is so great because it is a Lions player.
Click to expand...
55 for a rookie is better than 48.9 for a second year Vet, at least the last time I checked.
 
MikeDitkaPolishSausage

MikeDitkaPolishSausage

Well-known member
Joined:
Aug 12, 2013
Posts:
9,926
Liked Posts:
7,672
Location:
Black Rainbow’s Grandma’s house.
truthbedamned said:
Why do people still respond to Rick? If nobody responded to @nc0gnet0 he might get tired of talking to himself and leave. Nobody gives a **** about the Lions. Please stop feeding the troll.
Click to expand...
Honestly I keep responding to him because I love watching how he makes himself looks like an idiot. He grows even more pathetic with each day that passes.
 
remydat

remydat

CCS Hall of Fame
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '19
Joined:
Sep 15, 2012
Posts:
64,235
Liked Posts:
40,983
nc0gnet0 said:
55 for a rookie is better than 48.9 for a second year Vet, at least the last time I checked.
Click to expand...

Except it was 70.4 his second year. 2022 was his third year. So Gipson has proven he can play well in the NFL. Paschal has not. The end.
 

Payton!34

Well-known member
Joined:
Apr 18, 2013
Posts:
2,580
Liked Posts:
1,320
nc0gnet0 said:
Actually, if you want a little education, the proper term would be "throwback".
Click to expand...
You obviously don’t know what throwback means.

I think you’re of the opinion that things are constantly evolving and that’s simply untrue.

Times have devolved in the past, we went back in time as a civilization after the Bronze Age. The world devolved when the dinosaurs went extinct to a catastrophic world event. Overall, the world might evolve through time but it goes back and forth as does the stock market for example.

You’re just factually incorrect. Admit your defeat like a Bear and not like a Lion and move on.

The only thing that I can think of that doesn’t ever go backwards is Time and it’s Time for you to move on!

I win! Thank you
 

Payton!34

Well-known member
Joined:
Apr 18, 2013
Posts:
2,580
Liked Posts:
1,320
How do some people like DaBears70 BC(he’s old AF) and cockinmouth the Lions fan not know and or realize that they are always the common denominator on issues.

How does one not realize that maybe they are the problem? If you see that 10 people like something and you’re the only one disliking the issue, maybe you’re the problem.

Especially, when that very situation arises 500 times???? When does it sink in? How can one be so self unaware???

What’s so hard about admitting fault? No one’s perfect. Admit and move onto the next issue.

They obviously will not change and it’s sad.

I didn’t realize that obvious didn’t apply to everyone. I think they lie to themselves so much that they believe in their reality.
 

napo55

Well-known member
Joined:
Mar 24, 2016
Posts:
2,333
Liked Posts:
1,565
Nelly said:
Much different system too, no? Hard to gauge in isolation. As far as how the Bears made out in deciding to trade Roquan we came out way ahead. Although an interesting thought is to say that maybe we still would sign Edwards to play the middle with Quan at the will. That'd be a sweet duo as well, but in that instance we wouldn't have Sewell and Dexter.
Click to expand...
Way too early to say the Bears came out ahead. Most objectve observers rate Roquan as better than Edmunds. But they are both young, so the tale will be told in the next couple of years.
 
nc0gnet0

nc0gnet0

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Nov 27, 2014
Posts:
20,002
Liked Posts:
4,825
Payton!34 said:
You obviously don’t know what throwback means.

I think you’re of the opinion that things are constantly evolving and that’s simply untrue.

Times have devolved in the past, we went back in time as a civilization after the Bronze Age. The world devolved when the dinosaurs went extinct to a catastrophic world event. Overall, the world might evolve through time but it goes back and forth as does the stock market for example.

You’re just factually incorrect. Admit your defeat like a Bear and not like a Lion and move on.

The only thing that I can think of that doesn’t ever go backwards is Time and it’s Time for you to move on!

I win! Thank you
Click to expand...
Keep digging yourself deeper.
You could not be more wrong.
A throwback is when traits reappear which had disappeared generations ago.
Catastrophic events are not the result of evolution, they have nothing to do with evolution, good god, you can't be this stupid. If life as we know it is wiped out because of a nuclear war, it didn't "devolve".
No, you did not win, you just look even more like an idiot now.
Wow, just wow.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

10,939members
95,962threads
4,550,767posts
331online users

Members online NOW

  • Member
  • Admin
  • Mod
  • Donor
  • HOF
Total: 331 (members: 36, guests: 295)
Top