**OFFICAIL** Bears 2024 Regular Season News & Schleisse - FTO Preferred - No ALTS! Derailing Is Discouraged!

dennehy

Well-known member
Joined:
Dec 29, 2015
Posts:
11,541
Liked Posts:
12,598
Location:
Jewels to get a case of Squirt
You didnt answer the question. What info are you claiming the NFL had indepedent of Tua that points definitively to a concussion?

There is a difference between a process being flawed and a process being grossly negligent in a tortious sense.
I did answer the question. I told you it didn't matter. Because he doesn't have to show that the NFL knew it was a concussion because, as I already said, it's about the outcome, that they let him play with a concussion. And then fired the doctor who treated him.
 

remydat

CCS Hall of Fame
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '19
Joined:
Sep 15, 2012
Posts:
62,596
Liked Posts:
40,094
And would you be saying this if he was outstanding in a Bears uniform last year, or is this one of those things where you just have a narrative and aren't going to let anything get in the way of it?

If he was outstanding then I would probably be pissed as that might mean we won more games. I said from start best outcome this season would be foe Fields to progress and for us to have worst record so we can get a draft pick. Never cared about Claypool's numbers this year.
 

Montucky

Well-known member
Joined:
Oct 21, 2020
Posts:
9,839
Liked Posts:
4,156
If he was outstanding then I would probably be pissed as that might mean we won more games. I said from start best outcome this season would be foe Fields to progress and for us to have worst record so we can get a draft pick. Never cared about Claypool's numbers this year.
Well he didn't really progress, but that's not a conversation even worth having with this lot.
 

remydat

CCS Hall of Fame
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '19
Joined:
Sep 15, 2012
Posts:
62,596
Liked Posts:
40,094
I did answer the question. I told you it didn't matter. Because he doesn't have to show that the NFL knew it was a concussion because, as I already said, it's about the outcome, that they let him play with a concussion. And then fired the doctor who treated him.

The official record says it was not a concussion and Tua agreed it was not a concussion. So not sure how you can claim it was a concussion without presenting evidence of that alleged fact.

You realize the standard of evidence in court is higher than CCS logic, "it was a concussion because I said so."
 

remydat

CCS Hall of Fame
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '19
Joined:
Sep 15, 2012
Posts:
62,596
Liked Posts:
40,094
Well he didn't really progress, but that's not a conversation even worth having with this lot.

Oh really so he didnt have more TDs and combined yards than last year?
 

dentfan

No gods! No Masters!
Joined:
Apr 28, 2013
Posts:
5,325
Liked Posts:
4,529
Lots of drafts had WR's that nobody thought would be #1 type WR's in the NFL and got drafted outside the 1st round only to become #1 WR's in the NFL. There's nobody in this world that can say what kind of careers any of these kids will have at the next level so lets just hope the Bears are the next team to find that #1 WR after the 1st round. There's no exact science to these drafts.
Oh, in that case, I agree with you. Maybe the confusion is that since this is Wide Receiver Draft Z, people think that means no #1. Now, I don’t think there’s really a lot of good Xs. That doesn’t mean no #1’s.
 

Montucky

Well-known member
Joined:
Oct 21, 2020
Posts:
9,839
Liked Posts:
4,156
Oh really so he didnt have more TDs and combined yards than last year?
Well you would hope with significantly more attempts so too would come more touchdowns and yardage. He also had more interceptions and fumbles, though... womp womp.
 

dennehy

Well-known member
Joined:
Dec 29, 2015
Posts:
11,541
Liked Posts:
12,598
Location:
Jewels to get a case of Squirt
The official record says it was not a concussion and Tua agreed it was not a concussion. So not sure how you can claim it was a concussion without presenting evidence of that alleged fact.

You realize the standard of evidence in court is higher than CCS logic, "it was a concussion because I said so."
They fired the person who made that determination, based on the determination, right?
 

Discus fish salesman

Well-known member
Joined:
Mar 31, 2018
Posts:
15,809
Liked Posts:
20,475
The official record says it was not a concussion and Tua agreed it was not a concussion. So not sure how you can claim it was a concussion without presenting evidence of that alleged fact.

You realize the standard of evidence in court is higher than CCS logic, "it was a concussion because I said so."
Jesus Remy, don't you ever find yourself rambling for pages/days on end and think you should shut the **** up?
 

remydat

CCS Hall of Fame
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '19
Joined:
Sep 15, 2012
Posts:
62,596
Liked Posts:
40,094
Well you would hope with significantly more attempts so too would come more touchdowns and yardage. He also had more interceptions and fumbles, though... womp womp.

Are you really this stupid? His completion %, TD%, passer rating, YPA, and QBR all went up. His Int% actually went down from 3.7% to 3.5%. His TD% doubled from 2.6% to 5.3% so that accounts for difference in attempts jackass.

In addition, his yards per rush and and TD per rush also increased significantly so he did progress.
 

Montucky

Well-known member
Joined:
Oct 21, 2020
Posts:
9,839
Liked Posts:
4,156
Are you really this stupid? His completion %, TD%, passer rating, YPA, and QBR all went up. His Int% actually went down from 3.7% to 3.5%. His TD% doubled from 2.6% to 5.3% so that accounts for difference in attempts jackass.

In addition, his yards per rush and and TD per rush also increased significantly so he did progress.
You're so excited to prove something that if it were actually true would be so apparent that we wouldn't have to argue about it.
 

remydat

CCS Hall of Fame
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '19
Joined:
Sep 15, 2012
Posts:
62,596
Liked Posts:
40,094
They fired the person who made that determination, based on the determination, right?

The statement makes clear Tua blamed his stumbling on the back and ankle injuries and did not complain of any symptoms consistent with a concussion. He passed the concussion exam.

They fired him because of public reaction and he was a convenient scapegoat. He followed their protocols and nothing in the record claims Tua had a concussion. This is a joint statememt so the NFLPA signed off on their conclusions contained therein.

So again any lawsuit would have to actually start by producing some evidence of a concussion as none was presented and get around the fact that Tua is on record blaming back and ankle injuries and not claiming any concussion like symptoms.
 

remydat

CCS Hall of Fame
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '19
Joined:
Sep 15, 2012
Posts:
62,596
Liked Posts:
40,094
You're so excited to prove something that if it were actually true would be so apparent that we wouldn't have to argue about it.

What a dumb response. There are always stupid people in the world who believe things despite all evidence to the contrary. The stats showed improvement. Sorry that hurts your feelings.
 

Montucky

Well-known member
Joined:
Oct 21, 2020
Posts:
9,839
Liked Posts:
4,156
What a dumb response. There are always stupid people in the world who believe things despite all evidence to the contrary. The stats showed improvement. Sorry that hurts your feelings.
His rookie year he was a significantly below the baseline for acceptable starting quarterback play. His second year he was significantly below the baseline for acceptable starting quarterback play. You want to argue the varying degrees he was the worst or near the worst quarterback in the NFL each of his first two seasons? You're missing the forest for the trees.
 

remydat

CCS Hall of Fame
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '19
Joined:
Sep 15, 2012
Posts:
62,596
Liked Posts:
40,094
His rookie year he was a significantly below the baseline for acceptable starting quarterback play. His second year he was significantly below the baseline for acceptable starting quarterback play. You want to argue the varying degrees he was the worst or near the worst quarterback in the NFL each of his first two seasons? You're missing the forest for the trees.

Nope I said he progressed. He did per the stats. You were wrong. That is all.

I wasnt arguing anything. You felt the need to chime in disputing my opinion because you have been hating on Fields all season. The topic wasnt even Fields but Claypool but you are so fixated on Fields you couldnt help yourself.
 

Discus fish salesman

Well-known member
Joined:
Mar 31, 2018
Posts:
15,809
Liked Posts:
20,475
His rookie year he was a significantly below the baseline for acceptable starting quarterback play. His second year he was significantly below the baseline for acceptable starting quarterback play. You want to argue the varying degrees he was the worst or near the worst quarterback in the NFL each of his first two seasons? You're missing the forest for the trees.
You might actually be ret@rded.
 

Top