- Joined:
- Aug 20, 2012
- Posts:
- 43,828
- Liked Posts:
- 52,992
Except he was going to overspend for Larry O. Larry O was not worth 13m a year.
To you.
Also, clearly the injury affected his market
Except he was going to overspend for Larry O. Larry O was not worth 13m a year.
Poles is on record for a year now saying he wants to be selective. He doesn’t want to overspend. He could have done it with Roquan but hit his limit and said “I’m out.” He’s not going to exceed his limits just to get a guy. He could have still signed Larry O but backed out for medicals. He has his parameters and won’t exceed them.
Poles is on record for a year now saying he wants to be selective. He doesn’t want to overspend. He could have done it with Roquan but hit his limit and said “I’m out.” He’s not going to exceed his limits just to get a guy. He could have still signed Larry O but backed out for medicals. He has his parameters and won’t exceed them.
Not confused at all. Saying your response to me was pointless.
He's also on record saying that sometimes you need to overspend in free agency. He mentioned he's going to be selective. Selective does not mean cheap. What part of this is confusing for you?
You honestly believe he's not gonna pay big this year when he has double the cap space of the next closest team? Poles will need to spend big just to reach the cap floor.
To you.
Also, clearly the injury affected his market
He's also on record saying that sometimes you need to overspend in free agency. He mentioned he's going to be selective. Selective does not mean cheap. What part of this is confusing for you?
Not sure what you’re getting at hereLol ok so if he he spends 22m on Payne then wouldnt that just be overspending to you as others may just consider that a fair price for Payne?
Not sure what you’re getting at here
You are saying he wont overspend in FA but that is an entirely subjective determination as you just pointed out so if you say 22m is too much for Payne then why wouldn't the response simply be "to you but that is his market rate."
Point is how are you independently deciding what amout is too much and what amount is the market value of the player?
Would love to know where he said that. Thanks
I’d make an argument he was going to overspend on Ogunjobi. Payne is also way better.Poles is on record for a year now saying he wants to be selective. He doesn’t want to overspend. He could have done it with Roquan but hit his limit and said “I’m out.” He’s not going to exceed his limits just to get a guy. He could have still signed Larry O but backed out for medicals. He has his parameters and won’t exceed them.
Payne is better. Not really sure why Remy mentioned him.I’d make an argument he was going to overspend on Ogunjobi. Payne is also way better.
I’m not deciding.
Poles is.
You said Larry O wasn’t worth 13.
I said to you.
To Poles he was.
It will be an overpay when Poles goes over HIS personal valuation just to get a guy.Right so if Poles pays Payne 22m then you are saying that isnt an overpay because Poles thought he was worth it? Then when will it ever be an overpay?
It will be an overpay when Poles goes over HIS personal valuation just to get a guy.
What you or I think the value is is not relevant.
Well sir is much nicer than boot licker I guess.Sir, this forum is all about fan speculation. Are you new here?
It will be an overpay when Poles goes over HIS personal valuation just to get a guy.
What you or I think the value is is not relevant.
I mean yeah, we’re never going to know his personal evaluations. Closest we will get is watching him walk from some deals like Roquan.Ok but how would we know if he went above his personal valuation? Like how do we know he didnt go over his personal valuation on Larry O?
Not being difficult but you are setting up pretty much an unfalsifiable standard as few if any GMs are going to say I overpaid for a guy.