**OFFICAIL** Bears 2024 Regular Season News & Schleisse - FTO Preferred - No ALTS! Derailing Is Discouraged!

[NorcalBear]

He is ass. Does not mean he won't enjoy more success on the Lions than he ever did on the Bears.

Got it. Whatever. But if you find you are in, or drawn to toxic relationships.. its because you find peaceful things/ people boring. People who are constantly seeking pleasure, are needing those dopamine hits which lends to a fixation on a toxic person (in this case, spats with Bears fans for years on end). This forum... who cares.. but something to think about regarding your relationships. If they arent very peaceful.. this was an unsolicited tip. Just like most your posts in a Bears forum.

 

[Dejo]

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638622881792794657

 

[Dejo]

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638626811876720641

 

[Dejo]

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638728623065538560

 

[nc0gnet0]

Montgomery > Swift

Well, they will both be operating behind the same O-line, so I guess we find out this year, won't we?

 

[Discus fish salesman]

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638740900468629504

 

[Dejo]

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638740900468629504

 

[Les Grossman]

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638740900468629504

Dude will cost a 1st round pick for sure

 

[Brybeck01]

Dude will cost a 1st round pick for sure

I'd give a 25 1st.

Or a 23 2nd and filler

 

[Les Grossman]

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638728623065538560

This is interesting. Old vets that are cap casualties are not really what Poles has been looking for.

We’ll see but I’d think a few contract extensions would be in order. Kmet?

 

[remydat]

Maybe you should do a little research before you open your mouth an insert not one, but both of your feet?

Roquan Cap's hit for 2023 is 9 mil
Roquan's cap hit for 2024 is 13.5 mil
Roquan's cap hit for 2025 is 22.5 mil

potential out in 2026

Stupid little child.

Roquan Smith | NFL | Spotrac.com

Roquan Smith contract and salary cap details, full contract breakdowns, salaries, signing bonus, roster bonus, dead money, and valuations.

www.spotrac.com

Except if you dump him after 2025 there is 15m in dead cap. So all told that would be 3 years of service and 60m in cap hits and cash spend. So still 20m a year. And if he is still good then you face the issue of potentially having to cut a good player going into his age 29 season.

By contrast, Edmunds cap hits are reasonable throughout and he will be a FA at 28. So we get to keep him throughout his prime if he is good and the cap hit to cut him in 2025 or 2026 is jusy 4.8m and 2.4.

So it is clearly a cheaper contract with a better structure for a player during his absolutely prime years.

 

[MikeDitkaPolishSausage]

Well, they will both be operating behind the same O-line, so I guess we find out this year, won't we?

What does that have to do with anything? Monty has been the better back. Plan and simple. Stats don’t lie in this case.

 

[nc0gnet0]

Except if you dump him after 2025 there is 15m in dead cap. So all told that would be 3 years of service and 60m in cap hits and cash spend. So still 20m a year. And if he is still good then you face the issue of potentially having to cut a good player going into his age 29 season.

By contrast, Edmunds cap hits are reasonable throughout and he will be a FA at 28. So we get to keep him throughout his prime if he is good and the cap hit to cut him in 2025 or 2026 is jusy 4.8m and 2.4.

So it is clearly a cheaper contract with a better structure for a player during his absolutely prime years.

Three years of Roquan would be 60 million
Three years of Edwards is 55 million.

 

[nc0gnet0]

What does that have to do with anything? Monty has been the better back. Plan and simple. Stats don’t lie in this case.

Not even sure your point, Monty replaced Williams, not Swift.

 

[remydat]

Three years of Roquan would be 60 million
Three years of Edwards is 55 million.

But he will still be 27 at the end of his 3rd year. The point is there would be little reason for Bears not to keep him in his age 28 season for 17.4m if he is good. That will be chump change for a top LB in 2026.

By contrast, after 3 years you likely need to cut, trade or restructure Quan even if he is good because otherwise he will cost 27m a year.

So your point is stupid. We got the 5th best LB per PFF on a cheaper and much better deal for 4 years in his prime. As well as 2nd and 5th round picks. In exchange we passed on paying the 21st ranked LB more money on a poorly structured deal.

There is no way that isnt a win for the Bears.

 

[nc0gnet0]

But he will still be 27 at the end of his 3rd year. The point is there would be little reason for Bears not to keep him in his age 28 season for 17.4m if he is good. That will be chump change for a top LB in 2026.

By contrast, after 3 years you likely need to cut, trade or restructure Quan even if he is good because otherwise he will cost 27m a year.

So your point is stupid. We got the 5th best LB per PFF on a cheaper and much better deal for 4 years in his prime. As well as 2nd and 5th round picks. In exchange we passed on paying the 21st ranked LB more money on a poorly structured deal.

There is no way that isnt a win for the Bears.

That was never my point, but thanks for chiming in anyways. Originally, my point was, that the overwhelming sentiment on CCS was that NO LB was worth that amount of money, as it was not a premium position. Now, all of a sudden, everyone has done a complete 180. Regardless of if Roquan makes a little more, etc etc, both are in the top 5 highest paid LB's in the league.

After that shit-for-brains made an erroneous statement about cap hits. I took him to task over it.

I don't care to get into an argument over who is better, which contract will be better, because that can not be determined for three years. i do know this, part of the trade compensation for Roquan was for last year.

There is also something to be said for a franchise that takes care of its own, and Vets do notice this.

Now run along and take your vortex elsewhere.

 

[bamainatlanta]

Again, you can't pick and choose what years of a contract to single out just to fit your reetarded narrative.

Edmunds is cheaper and a more cost controlled option than Roquan which was the entire point to not giving Roquan the contract he wanted

And to get a 5th & a 2nd.

 

[NorcalBear]

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638594033475006464

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1638559637212372994

I peeped his story on Instagram and it also shows a 4th slide of him sacking Justin Fields. So all 4 teams from the NFC North. Cant see how thats a clear sign. Maybe he added the 4th Bears slide later. Lots of Bears fans simping in the comments.

.

 

[Nuremberg Bear]

That was never my point, but thanks for chiming in anyways. Originally, my point was, that the overwhelming sentiment on CCS was that NO LB was worth that amount of money, as it was not a premium position. Now, all of a sudden, everyone has done a complete 180. Regardless of if Roquan makes a little more, etc etc, both are in the top 5 highest paid LB's in the league.

After that shit-for-brains made an erroneous statement about cap hits. I took him to task over it.

I don't care to get into an argument over who is better, which contract will be better, because that can not be determined for three years. i do know this, part of the trade compensation for Roquan was for last year.

There is also something to be said for a franchise that takes care of its own, and Vets do notice this.

Now run along and take your vortex elsewhere.

What's wrong with you? One signed a four year contract and the other a five year contract. And you come in and compare it within first 3 years. ?‍

I loved Smith but he just asked for too much. And maybe, just maybe, he learned his market price and took less money as requested at time.

Very very often, if not with every post, your brain looks worse than my English...

 

[remydat]

That was never my point, but thanks for chiming in anyways. Originally, my point was, that the overwhelming sentiment on CCS was that NO LB was worth that amount of money, as it was not a premium position. Now, all of a sudden, everyone has done a complete 180. Regardless of if Roquan makes a little more, etc etc, both are in the top 5 highest paid LB's in the league.

After that shit-for-brains made an erroneous statement about cap hits. I took him to task over it.

I don't care to get into an argument over who is better, which contract will be better, because that can not be determined for three years. i do know this, part of the trade compensation for Roquan was for last year.

There is also something to be said for a franchise that takes care of its own, and Vets do notice this.

Now run along and take your vortex elsewhere.

What is your proof that was the overwhelming sentiment? I think the overwhelming sentiment was that Quan wasn't worth 20m a year ie being the highest paid off ball LB. I think most were aware the Bears offered him a contract and thought 18m a year would be a fair price. The issue was again people didn't think he should be the highest paid. So the fact Edmunds accepted the 18m a year which is what many thought Quan was worth does not support your point at all.

One year at 22m, other than that Edmunds costs 14,17 and 17 on the others.

But please continue to make yourself look like your usual reetarded self

Meanwhile Roquan has a 22m, followed by his final two years being a 27m cap hit.

Shut the **** up

The poster didn't make a mistake. He said the cap hit was 22m FOLLOWED by 27m in each of the last two years. The followed by is the clue that he was referring to the 3rd year cap hit followed by 27m the last 2 years. Your dumbass interpreted it as him saying the cap hit was 22m in the current year but his post never actually said that.

Finally you are 100% full of shit. You comment on how good or bad moves are all the time. You only want to now claim you need to wait 3 years because Edmunds actually graded out a better player this year than Quan. If it was the other way around you would be claiming how the Bears signed a worse player. We all know this is true because you routinely make proclamations about how Lions players are better than Bears players based on PFF grades in the prior year. So the facts are that currently the Bears signed a better player to a much better deal plus got a 2nd round pick and a 5th round pick. The end.