- Joined:
- Nov 27, 2014
- Posts:
- 19,939
- Liked Posts:
- 4,822
No, not really. The trading of Quan made sense at the time. I am laughing at the comments made by the Pole riders on CCS and comparing them to the same comments they are making now.To your discussion perhaps, since you're trying to find any and every way possible to shit on the Bears.
CCS Pole riders at time of Roquan trade:
"No LB is worth that amount of money"
CCS Pole riders after the signing of Edmunds:
"brilliant, this was a magnificent signing!! "
The fact is indisputable, over the course of the next three years, there is not much difference in money. If you want to re-open the argument after three years, and the inevitable renegotiation of Roquans contract, have at it.
I thought keeping Roquan was the smart play.
I think signing Edmunds is also a smart play.
Time will only tell which would have been better.