- Joined:
- Jan 11, 2014
- Posts:
- 7,197
- Liked Posts:
- 4,564
- Location:
- Chicago
I clicked over and it was still free? Try again? I took screenshots of RB/TE
Official NFL Draft Thread - Bear Fans Only - and No Montucky!
- Thread starter playthrough2001
- Start date
thenewguy
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Nov 28, 2012
- Posts:
- 1,459
- Liked Posts:
- 2,040
The Raiders had one of the worst secondaries in the league and hired Pete Carroll. Hard to imagine they won't be looking hard at corners. Carroll does love his RB's too. Who knows what Spytek wants or if he actually has control.
DefNextYear
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Jan 21, 2024
- Posts:
- 3,712
- Liked Posts:
- 3,567
My favorite teams
I'll say a couple things...
- Raiders are horrible in a lot of areas. They need a lot of help... the least of their concerns should be low cost positions like RB. You can get RBs for cheaper in other ways like free agency. They just ran this cycle with Jacobs. He did nothing for them and left. You're right about the secondary and they just cut a starting corner. I think Johnson is the pick if he runs well, but there's other good options if not.
- I looked at Pete Carroll's drafts before and he didn't draft a RB in the first 2 rounds til year 7 or so (Penny). Granted, he had Lynch, so it's a bit inconclusive. But, there's nothing there that guarantees he'd take one at 6. Historically, those first 7 drafts, he LOADED up on defense.
- Spytek was in Tampa where they didn't prioritize backs (White and Bucky). Why would he take one at 6? Also, I think Spytek has a lot of power. I don't think Carroll had the ability to get that kind of authority from the Raiders. Everyone knows he's old and there's no reason to give him total control when he could be gone in 2-5 years (depending on if he's fired or just retires). Spytek being Brady's buddy, is going to be there a long time. I'm sure Brady did not put a leash on Spytek to cater to an old HC no one else showed much interest in. Ultimately, Spytek has to be happy with the draft picks made when Carroll is eventually gone. He can't bend over backwards to appease him.
- Brady was never part of a team that drafted a RB high. If he has any pull, I see no reason at all for him to advocate for a RB.
- Chip Kelly has two of his OSU backs in this draft. It's a very deep draft for RBs, as we all know. I'm sure he's in everyone's ear saying they should take one in the 2nd.
- Raiders OL is not good at run blocking. 4th last in yards before contact last year. They should grab more linemen before they kill the RB. They'll almost certainly have a good OT available at 6.
- First round RBs in the last decade have been mostly unsuccessful for the team that drafted them. I'm going to go off memory, but I think none have a winning playoff record and many only have one appearance, if any. I think they average less than 5 years with the team (too lazy to verify again, but that's close enough). Fournette was gone after 3. Elliot was one that lasted the longest and the wheels completely fell off and he turned into nothing. Shelf life is horrible. Why do that to Jeanty when they're nowhere close to competing? He'll take 3 years of mileage before they even stand a chance in that division.
- Joined:
- Feb 5, 2013
- Posts:
- 4,726
- Liked Posts:
- 3,944
Hard to not like that
- Joined:
- Aug 21, 2012
- Posts:
- 30,085
- Liked Posts:
- 24,727
- Location:
- USA
This is the type of draft that good scouting departments make their money on.
bearsfan1977
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Mar 23, 2016
- Posts:
- 3,843
- Liked Posts:
- 4,147
Completely agree. There doesn’t seem to be any real consensus among most players out of the top 10 or so. A lot of disparities among the analysts.
bearsfan1977
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Mar 23, 2016
- Posts:
- 3,843
- Liked Posts:
- 4,147
Exactly. Obviously there are different opinions in each draft, but I’ve never seen one like this where there are such wild swings in the predictions.
DanielCCSBears
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Jul 7, 2022
- Posts:
- 6,095
- Liked Posts:
- 1,971
My favorite teams
So I know the Bears have Jackson Thuney and Dalman but if one guy gets hurt you're virtually back to square one because there is ZERO talented depth.
So no I'm not ready to take a TE or a RB at 10.
Beyond they still need depth on the defensive line. So I'm trying to figure out this recent ground swell of support for ba skill guy over talent in the trenches.
So no I'm not ready to take a TE or a RB at 10.
Beyond they still need depth on the defensive line. So I'm trying to figure out this recent ground swell of support for ba skill guy over talent in the trenches.
Washington
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Mar 22, 2016
- Posts:
- 4,144
- Liked Posts:
- 3,241
And, what happens if one of the OTs get hurt again which I feel confident will happen? There is a hope and a prayer on Kiran but that scares the crap out of me. Definitely need not only more depth, but an actual play maker or 2 on the DL. Poles will **** it up.
- Joined:
- Aug 20, 2012
- Posts:
- 45,500
- Liked Posts:
- 55,116
Dane Brugler said he would feel comfortable getting a good RB into round 4.
DefNextYear
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Jan 21, 2024
- Posts:
- 3,712
- Liked Posts:
- 3,567
My favorite teams
For people hoping for the trade gods to call, here's what Breer says about draft day trades (of course, just his best guess):
Do you think there will be less trades in the first round than usual given the quality of this draft class?
David, off-hand, I’d say less early, but there could be some action starting in the teens.
Just looking at it logically, I think the separation of Carter and Hunter from the rest of the class, quarterbacks aside, will probably keep the Browns and Giants where they are at Nos. 2 and 3. After that, you probably have a dozen players who are in the same category of prospect, which might kill a team’s motivation to go up from, say, No. 12 to Nos. 6 or 7.
Where the action would begin is when supply is starting to run low at certain positions, and that could happen in the teens.
www.si.com
Do you think there will be less trades in the first round than usual given the quality of this draft class?
David, off-hand, I’d say less early, but there could be some action starting in the teens.
Just looking at it logically, I think the separation of Carter and Hunter from the rest of the class, quarterbacks aside, will probably keep the Browns and Giants where they are at Nos. 2 and 3. After that, you probably have a dozen players who are in the same category of prospect, which might kill a team’s motivation to go up from, say, No. 12 to Nos. 6 or 7.
Where the action would begin is when supply is starting to run low at certain positions, and that could happen in the teens.
Mailbag: Will Giants End Up With Abdul Carter, Travis Hunter or a Trade
Here’s why one option would be a lot cleaner in New York. Plus, your questions on Sam Darnold’s contract, a 49ers trade idea, first-round sleepers and more.
Discus fish salesman
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Mar 31, 2018
- Posts:
- 16,473
- Liked Posts:
- 21,609
As much as I think the Bears should go OL or DL at 10, it certainly isn't because I think they should pass on a great talent at rb/te to pick depth for the iOL intentionally.
DefNextYear
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Jan 21, 2024
- Posts:
- 3,712
- Liked Posts:
- 3,567
My favorite teams
The problem is the board at 10. If Membou and Campbell are gone (likely), the big boards are clear of OL guys til the 20s. Brugler has Simmons at 20, Conerly at 23. Jeremiah has Booker at 23 and Zabel at 24. So it becomes a big reach to go OL at 10. I would like to address OL, but feels like a trade down is needed to do that... or a trade up from the 2nd. I think they have to come away with a guard in the draft, probably in the 2nd or 3rd. I don't think they'll be in striking distance for an OT, though I could really see Simmons fall and maybe they want that gamble.
- Joined:
- Aug 20, 2012
- Posts:
- 45,500
- Liked Posts:
- 55,116
This type of thinking was why people didn’t want Verse last year at 9.
Who cares where the media has guys? If Poles thinks someone like Conerly is a 8-10 year starter at LT you run the pick up.
- Joined:
- Feb 5, 2013
- Posts:
- 4,726
- Liked Posts:
- 3,944
Meaningless my ass. The Bears basically knocked their asses out of the playoffs by making them play the Eagles. That’s easily worth 4 spots in the draft to me. That and my favorite prospect will be there regardless
- Joined:
- Feb 5, 2013
- Posts:
- 4,726
- Liked Posts:
- 3,944
The best Jeanty comp to me is a cross between Gibbs / Monty.
baredown
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Apr 20, 2013
- Posts:
- 748
- Liked Posts:
- 681
This isn't complicated. At #10, the Bears should be looking for top-level talent, not filling need and certainly not worrying about depth concerns. This year, the tier-1 talent is two guys. Those two guys are not even on the horizon for the Bears. Consensus seems to be that the tier-2 talent runs ~6-8 guys deep, plus a QB. The Bears should end up with one or two guys in their tier-2 bucket to choose from at #10. They should just take whomever is the highest-rated guy left in the bucket, regardless of position. If it's Walker, fine, take him. If it's Warren, fine, same thing. Tet? Same thing, take him. Johnson? Same thing. Too many people here see filling holes with #10 as meeting need, without recognizing that having top-level talent on the roster is the ultimate need. This isn't complicated...
- Joined:
- Aug 20, 2012
- Posts:
- 45,500
- Liked Posts:
- 55,116
Chicago Bears Draft Needs, Picks & Mock Draft for 2025
Bears team needs, depth charts & draft analysis, identifying positions where the team can improve in the 2025 NFL Draft. Bears 2025 roster needs & analysis.
www.sharpfootballanalysis.com
Some fodder here for the Swift is a bum crowd. Lots of other good stats too
DefNextYear
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Jan 21, 2024
- Posts:
- 3,712
- Liked Posts:
- 3,567
My favorite teams
For what it's worth, still looks free on my phone actually.
thenewguy
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Nov 28, 2012
- Posts:
- 1,459
- Liked Posts:
- 2,040
Agree with this. There not a big gap at OL/DL/Edge at 10 and the picks at 39/41/72. There is a lot of talent to get depth and development picks in the 2nd and 3rd rounds. There are only a handful of blue chip talent prospects in this draft and if you can get a difference maker at 10 you take it. The Bears do need difference makers that teams game plan around. I don't want a roster of average and slightly above average players. It's where the Packers and Steelers are. Good orgs, and we'll coached, but just won't be able to beat top teams. We all hope Caleb and Rome take them out of that tier, but it wouldn't hurt to add another.
Staff online NOW
-
SilenceSModerator