Discus fish salesman
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Mar 31, 2018
- Posts:
- 16,498
- Liked Posts:
- 21,641
Sure they might draft Warren but trading up sounds like a bit of a reach to me
Imagine the Falcons trading up for a TE with a debatably better TE that will be drafted later, while having a TE who they drafted #4 on their roster that is a bust.
I don't feel like we have nearly as many holes. Jeanty would be a HUGE upgrade. What I'm looking at right now at #10 would be in impact player. To me, that's RB, TE, maybe LT/DE if the pick starts. #39 and #41 are for depth, and future starters. Jeanty would have an IMMEDIATE impact. Would Hampton? Henderson? Judkins? Kaleb? Maybe. But there are only a few blue chip OFF players, and Jeanty is one of them.
Whatever they do, they have my trust. I expect them at #10 to go RB, TE, LT, DE, or DT. That's it.
Great teams have good depth. Bears don't have that. Trading up for a luxury is something a SB contender has the luxury of, not the bears. I'm fine with jeanty if he falls to 10, if they trade up for him then they should have a mental assessment