- Joined:
- Sep 15, 2012
- Posts:
- 63,246
- Liked Posts:
- 40,357
If we can get a 3rd I agree. That's a win.
You're thinking about that way too hard. I'm not suggesting Jenkins do his own thing in the line. I'm saying we've seen this before. Perhaps Olsen was not the best example. Versatility was something that Jenkins was praised for. I imagine someone that is versatile is capable of playing in multiple schemes. We drafted D.Manning to play Cover 3 and Cover 1. How many times was the dude out of position even though on paper he clearly was the most suited for it? I find it hard to believe a couple of weeks in that Jenkins is that poor of a scheme fit.
That is not what you said. Your original comment was about fitting the scheme to the player. Hence why I pointed out while that is possible for say WR, it isnt really for OL. Hence why most guys draft OL thry think fit whatever scheme they intend to run.
Jenkins profiles as more of a power blocker hence why some questioned if the feet to play Tackle. Someone that is a true scheme fit would never have people questioning their lateral movement or ability to block at the 2nd level. If there is a criticism of an OL fit for this scheme it would generally be if they are big enough and strong enough to hold their own because again they tend to be smaller and quick not necessarily strong.
That doesnt mean Jenkins could never play in this scheme as whatever he lacks in quickness and agility he may make up for in strength but the point is it is not a natural fit.
Last edited: