czman
Well-known member
- Joined:
- May 7, 2013
- Posts:
- 2,210
- Liked Posts:
- 545
Did I not praise the Montgomery trade? As for being spoiled, we're in the "offseason discussion/rumors" topic. I'm simply talking about what I'd like to see the cubs do. That was literally the point in me starting this thread. Honestly, I don't see why people are getting so defensive as though no one can question a decision the front office has made. I mean it's not like I will be sitting in the 2017 IST's complaining for days on end about them trading for Wade Davis. I just want to see the cubs build depth in a weak area. I'm sure if you asked Jed and Theo they would say that is their goal. And frankly, I'm sure if they don't come away with some players there this offseason they would consider that a failure too because that is their stated goal.
The problem, and why I think so many people are jumping on you a bit, is that you are not talking about what they should do. You are stating they don't have enough cost controlled arms going forward and they need to add some. The reasonable statement is no one has enough cost controlled arms going forward. There are only so many dollars, picks, and trades. The Cubs team is not perfect. I am not sure if I would say you "sound spoiled", but I see why he said it. I think you just sound like a child playing a baseball video game.
The Cubs choose to stock up on hitting and trade for pitching. It has brought them one WS. They will be contenders this year.
I think everyone would agree the Cubs will need some pitching. It is hard to come by and damn expensive. If they can find some they might be a dynasty. The fact is dynasties in baseball in the modern era are very rare. I am going to keep my expectations reasonable. I suspect that trading for Davis now is cheaper than trading for a closer at the deadline. Additionally Solar may have declining value if the outfield stays healthy as he may not ever see the field if he stays here.
For the record I didn't like the Chapman trade either at the time. I still think they gave up a lot for him. I would rather have had Miller or not traded away as much. I wasn't in the room with the negotiators and it is obvious that they needed a closer in hindsight. So maybe they did overpay. We just don't have enough information about what the actual options were and winning a WS means something.
Lastly, I have said this before. I think some current Cubs fans have a skewed idea of how many prospects actually succeed and how much they are actually "worth" to a team. I am sure people can say X% of Y level prospects make Z all-star games. That does not mean they understand at an emotional level. Many times facts don't register on the emotional level and the gut reaction to to sports tends to be far from logical. I think the over valuing comes down to two things.
1) The really bad years where all we had to look forward to was minor leaguers.
2) The fact so many of these guys have come up and done so well.