Well, at least some people are actually backing up my point that the excuse to sign Heyward was that he was playing center field. It did not take long to see all his value go down there. Also, Fowler has always been a terrible outfielder. He was awful in Colorados vast outfield. One day in math class someone might be able to explain why a field, with the same infield dimensions, of bases being the same distance away, the mound in the middle the same 60'6 inches away, can have a bigger outfield. The small wrigley outfield made fowler look like a better outfielder than he ever was. I am sure st louis sees it since they put him in right to make his space smaller. Pretty much same deal with Heyward, but he has the big arm to add to it in right, but still looks completely lost when the sun plays around 4.
As far as the current talk out there, its " Machado is a better fit for the cubs, and if all it is going to cost is 3 years 100 million (again, hoping he would opt out) he is a better fit because Bryant can play outfield. More bumbfounded answers already considering Bryant will stay here and play wherever they want him to after he already turned down a 200 million dollar extension. Something tells me being the only third baseman a cub fan can remember as a great player is important to Bryant, not little league moves all over the field. Maddon claims he does not care, but something tells me he does. You keep bouncing him around all the tea in china wont keep him here.
