- Joined:
- May 14, 2010
- Posts:
- 17,841
- Liked Posts:
- 2,550
Why do people keep insisting on breaking up the most explosive line in the NHL.
Why do people keep insisting on breaking up the most explosive line in the NHL.
Went home for lunch and now proudly sporting it at the office.
Why do people keep insisting on breaking up the most explosive line in the NHL.
Cuz who the **** is gonna play with Toews?
Our 1st line will be hobbled Hossa, Toews, and a revolving door of 1LWs
The hope is that Nick Schmaltz or Tyler Motte arrives at camp ready to skate on the top line.
Why do people keep insisting on breaking up the most explosive line in the NHL.
The hope is that Nick Schmaltz or Tyler Motte arrives at camp ready to skate on the top line.
Because the top line was impotent last year, and Panarin/Kane on the same line is overkill.
Saad, versteeg largely played with t & k his rookie year, and Panarin of course is a rookie.Because Joel Quenneville is renowned for putting rookies on the top line and leaving them there while they go through NHL growing pains...
Saad, versteeg largely played with t & k his rookie year, and Panarin of course is a rookie.
The thing is he largely doesn't change lineups when winning.
Saad game 2 was on the top pair besides toews and Hossa.IIRC, Saad did not make his way to the top line until the latter half of his rookie year, but we're talking about depending on either Motte or Schmaltz to make the top line coming out of training camp. That would be a first, as far as I know. As for Panarin, I get that he was considered a rookie by the rules, but it's a bad comp for a guy with several years of professional experience under his belt.
IIRC, Saad did not make his way to the top line until the latter half of his rookie year, but we're talking about depending on either Motte or Schmaltz to make the top line coming out of training camp. That would be a first, as far as I know. As for Panarin, I get that he was considered a rookie by the rules, but it's a bad comp for a guy with several years of professional experience under his belt.
Because the top line was impotent last year, and Panarin/Kane on the same line is overkill.
The reason the nuclear option has been so rarely used over the past few years is precisely because putting too much of your scoring threat on a single line makes it too easy to counter. This is, apparently, news to you. As for your laughably irrelevant comparisons to completely different sports, they are literally some of worst sports thoughts that could conceivably come out of a legally competent adult. It's frightening, really.There were times last season when Q would put Kane or Panarin up with Toews, there wasn't a whole lot of scoring production. Your overkill comment is ignorant, you're basically calling a dangerous combination of Kane and Panarin overkill that's Bullshit. Those guys need to be kept together and they will continue to rape the opposition. Overkill :lmao:...Back in the day Toews, Kane and Sharpie....Overkill LMAO, you don't break up lethal combinations. Panarin and Kane with Anisimov could be even better this year but you want to call that Overkill. SMH
Phil Jackson shouldn't have played Jordan and Pippin together, overkill.
Buddy Ryan shouldn't have played Singletary, Dent, Hampton, Marshall, Wilson etc all together....overkill.
IIRC, Saad did not make his way to the top line until the latter half of his rookie year, but we're talking about depending on either Motte or Schmaltz to make the top line coming out of training camp. That would be a first, as far as I know. As for Panarin, I get that he was considered a rookie by the rules, but it's a bad comp for a guy with several years of professional experience under his belt.