OT: 2024 NCAA College Football Officail All-Encompassing (no run and shoot allowed) MEGA THREAD

[remydat]

What on earth are you talking about? Seriously? Is your premise that Bielema "taunted" Beamer to ensure his player's safety? Bielema was just upset at Beamer's constant "bush league" nonsense throughout the game.

Try to follow along. Other posters and Bielema himself claimed it was about player safety.

You seem to agree with me it wasnt.

 

[TheEarlofRobin]

Try to follow along. Other posters and Bielema himself claimed it was about player safety.

You seem to agree with me it wasnt.

You seem to be confusing the parts of player safety. Which play are you talking about? The SC fake fair catch, or that, in your opinion, Bielema let his player die in order to "taunt" Beamer?

If you are going to do the fake fair catch, then deal with the fall out. It's like doing a fake kneel down and blasting the DL....deal with the bad feelings or don't do it in the first place.

Again, is your premise that Bielema "taunted" Beamer to ensure his player's safety?

 

[remydat]

You seem to be confusing the parts of player safety. Which play are you talking about? The SC fake fair catch, or that, in your opinion, Bielema let his player die in order to "taunt" Beamer?

Bielema claimed he taunted the SC sidelines because he was upset about the risk of injury that could have happened when SC ran the trick play on the kick return.

Meanwhile he is taunting while one of his actually injured players is being tended to and had his players faking injuries throughout the game.

So again this seemed to be him being more pissed at Beamer for his "bush league" tactics than any real concern over injuries.

 

[bamainatlanta]

When you can go from back to back 3-9 seasons and losing some of your best players in the transfer portal and win the Big XII and get into the CFP it's an entirely new dynamic.

This is going to be great. Every year will have teams like ASU & Indiana

 

[bamainatlanta]

Bielema claimed he taunted the SC sidelines because he was upset about the risk of injury that could have happened when SC ran the trick play on the kick return.

Meanwhile he is taunting while one of his actually injured players is being tended to and had his players faking injuries throughout the game.

So again this seemed to be him being more pissed at Beamer for his "bush league" tactics than any real concern over injuries.

Bielema is a horse’s ass. Beamer is a horse’s ass. Both things are true.

 

[TheEarlofRobin]

Bielema claimed he taunted the SC sidelines because he was upset about the risk of injury that could have happened when SC ran the trick play on the kick return.

Meanwhile he is taunting while one of his actually injured players is being tended to and had his players faking injuries throughout the game.

So again this seemed to be him being more pissed at Beamer for his "bush league" tactics than any real concern over injuries.

Do you know what "taunting" means? It would be as if Bielema got away with the fake fair catch play and was rubbing Beamer's face in it. It's the opposite. Cool at "players faking injuries throughout the game'". Please list all the fake injuries.

And the ESPN rules analyst is the guy that got the Big10 to enact instant replay due to his atrocious officiating:

The fumble game | Illinois vs. Michigan, 20 years later

What could have been for the Illini football team in 2000 — and what came of the controversial call against Michigan

www.news-gazette.com

 

[bamainatlanta]

Do you know what "taunting" means? It would be as if Bielema got away with the fake fair catch play and was rubbing Beamer's face in it. It's the opposite. Cool at "players faking injuries throughout the game'". Please list all the fake injuries.

And the ESPN rules analyst is the guy that got the Big10 to enact instant replay due to his atrocious officiating:

The fumble game | Illinois vs. Michigan, 20 years later

What could have been for the Illini football team in 2000 — and what came of the controversial call against Michigan

www.news-gazette.com

I remember this game @TL1961

 

[remydat]

Bielema is a horse’s ass. Beamer is a horse’s ass. Both things are true.

I dont disagree. The only disagree appears to be from Illinois homers pretending this was really about player safety.

 

[TheEarlofRobin]

I dont disagree. The only disagree appears to be from Illinois homers pretending this was really about player safety

What was it about, then?

 

[remydat]

Do you know what "taunting" means? It would be as if Bielema got away with the fake fair catch play and was rubbing Beamer's face in it. It's the opposite. Cool at "players faking injuries throughout the game'". Please list all the fake injuries.

And the ESPN rules analyst is the guy that got the Big10 to enact instant replay due to his atrocious officiating:

The fumble game | Illinois vs. Michigan, 20 years later

What could have been for the Illini football team in 2000 — and what came of the controversial call against Michigan

www.news-gazette.com

taunting

1. the act of intentionally annoying and upsetting someone by making unkind…

dictionary.cambridge.org

His intent was to provoke Beamer so by definition it was taunting. Glad I could help clear that up for you.

 

[remydat]

What was it about, then?

You already know.

Bielema was just upset at Beamer's constant "bush league" nonsense throughout the game.

Did you forget what you said it was about?

 

[TheEarlofRobin]

You already know.


Did you forget what you said it was about?

I don't.

taunting

1. the act of intentionally annoying and upsetting someone by making unkind…

dictionary.cambridge.org

His intent was to provoke Beamer so by definition it was taunting. Glad I could help clear that up for you.

But he wasn't taunting after making the other guy look stupid. He was upset at the lack of sportsmanship. Two different things. Maybe you don't understand, because you are taunted so much on CCS.

Please list fake injuries, too.

 

[remydat]

I don't.

But he wasn't taunting after making the other guy look stupid. He was upset at the lack of sportsmanship. Two different things. Maybe you don't understand, because you are taunted so much on CCS.

Please list fake injuries, too.

Sir you already admitted what it was about again with the bold and it was not about player injuries.

So again I agree with you. It was not about player injuries. He was upset about the perceived lack of sportmanship and then showed his own lack of sportsmanship by taunting Beamer while one of his own players was hurt.

 

[TheEarlofRobin]

Sir you already admitted what it was about again with the bold and it was not about player injuries.

No, you don't understand. Pretending that you are fair catching a kick...taking some time, then running the ball out against an unsuspecting coverage team is a player injury issue. I'll just assume you didn't watch the game, as you apparently never watch any games.

And you aren't "agreeing with me" if you keep incorrectly using the term 'taunting'.

Please list fake injuries.

So, in sum, Bielema is a jerk and shouldn't have done what he did, but Beamer should have owned up to his 'gamesmanship' and not flown off the handle when called out on it. He should have just laughed. And Bill Lemonnier should no longer be a rules analyst.

 

[remydat]

No, you don't understand. Pretending that you are fair catching a kick...taking some time, then running the ball out against an unsuspecting coverage team is a player injury issue. I'll just assume you didn't watch the game, as you apparently never watch any games.

And you aren't "agreeing with me" if you keep incorrectly using the term 'taunting'.

Please list fake injuries.

So, in sum, Bielema is a jerk and shouldn't have done what he did, but Beamer should have owned up to his 'gamesmanship' and not flown off the handle when called out on it. He should have just laughed. And Bill Lemonnier should no longer be a rules analyst.

I understand the argument for why it is an injury concern. I just dont think that was why Bielema was upset. As you said Bielema was upset with what he considered to be a lack of sportsmanship. That is what I am agreeing with you on.

As for taunting, I used the word that fits. It has already been said by others that Bielema was doing it to get under Beamer's skin and cause him to lose focus which if so meets the definition of taunting.

As for faking injuries. At least send the guys to acting class so they can sell it better.

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1874232366266474729

 

[TL1961]

Bielema claimed he taunted the SC sidelines because he was upset about the risk of injury that could have happened when SC ran the trick play on the kick return.

Meanwhile he is taunting while one of his actually injured players is being tended to and had his players faking injuries throughout the game.

So again this seemed to be him being more pissed at Beamer for his "bush league" tactics than any real concern over injuries.

Pay attention!

Bielema’s player didn’t become any less safe by him taunting the sideline!

His player was being tended to by medical personnel, and his player was not severely injured or facing a life and death situation!

Bielema taunting Beamer did not make his player less safe!

Bielema praying over his player would not have made his player one bit safer!

You’re stuck in another vortex and you’re not gonna give up. You have decided for some reason that Bielema somehow endangered his player by not playing doctor and operating on him on the field. (Even though you earlier implied, it was a fake injury)

He was upset over the play in which South Carolina pretended the play was dead when it was not. He made it very, very clear -to anyone who wants to look at it objectively -that is what he was upset about and nothing absolutely nothing that he did contradicts that.

 

[playthrough2001]

No, you don't understand. Pretending that you are fair catching a kick...taking some time, then running the ball out against an unsuspecting coverage team is a player injury issue. I'll just assume you didn't watch the game, as you apparently never watch any games.

And you aren't "agreeing with me" if you keep incorrectly using the term 'taunting'.

Please list fake injuries.

So, in sum, Bielema is a jerk and shouldn't have done what he did, but Beamer should have owned up to his 'gamesmanship' and not flown off the handle when called out on it. He should have just laughed. And Bill Lemonnier should no longer be a rules analyst.

I’m pretty sure you’re an alt. However, if you aren’t, he’ll never stop no matter what unless you die while typing a response.

After a little more of this, you might prefer death.

 

[TL1961]

I’m pretty sure you’re an alt. However, if you aren’t, he’ll never stop no matter what unless you die while typing a response.

There’s only one way to end a vortex and we all know it.

Dear Remy,
You are right and everyone else is wrong.

Every statement you made is right, even though some of the statements contradict others. They’re all still right somehow.

Please stop now.

Signed, Everybody

 

[Aquineas]

I didn't intend to start a ruckus.

 

[remydat]

Pay attention!

Bielema’s player didn’t become any less safe by him taunting the sideline!

His player was being tended to by medical personnel, and his player was not severely injured or facing a life and death situation!

Bielema taunting Beamer did not make his player less safe!

Bielema praying over his player would not have made his player one bit safer!

You’re stuck in another vortex and you’re not gonna give up. You have decided for some reason that Bielema somehow endangered his player by not playing doctor and operating on him on the field. (Even though you earlier implied, it was a fake injury)

He was upset over the play in which South Carolina pretended the play was dead when it was not. He made it very, very clear -to anyone who wants to look at it objectively -that is what he was upset about and nothing absolutely nothing that he did contradicts that.

I didnt say Bielema endangered anyone. I said what he did was classless and he should have waited until after his player left the field. Better yet complain about that play when it actually happened.

We both agree he was upset at that play. I disagree with it being because of an injury risk. He was upset because he thought it violated unwritten rules of sportsmanship.