Sir you were wrong and you know it. You cant get 32% conservatives if it was 69% trans nor would it have survived peer review if that were the case.
Again where is the data for WAPO?
NAGA is one Native American group that supports the name. It was only founded in 2017 and its Native American membership is 75k. It also has far right ties to groups like Patriots Prayer.
Here are the Native American organizations that oppose the name including the Cherokees whom you profess to be a member of. They represent millions of Native Americans.
In its amicus brief filed in the case, the NCAI states that the combined enrollment of its member tribes in 2013 was 1.2 million individuals.[98]
Many tribal councils have passed resolutions or issued statements regarding their opposition to the name of the Washington Redskins, including the Cherokee and Comanche Nations of Oklahoma, the Inter Tribal Council of Arizona,[99] the Inter-Tribal Council of the Five Civilized Tribes,[100][101] the Oneida Indian Nation (New York),[102] the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe (North Dakota) and the United South and Eastern Tribes (USET).[103] In April 2014, Navajo Nation Council voted in favor of a statement opposing the name of the Washington team, as well as other disparaging references to American Indians by other professional sports franchises.[104] Other Native American groups advocating change include: the Native American Bar Association of DC,[105] the National Caucus of Native American State Legislators,[106] and the Society of American Indian Government Employees.[107]
But hey you found one obscure Native American organization with 75k members that support your position and ignored Native American groups that represent millions of Native Americans. LMFAO!.
I didnt have a position other then me making a joke.. did you already forget that? I have moved onto making fun of your vortex, and unfortunately for you, you didnt base your vortex on all of the above, you based it on a "scientific" study that was politically motivated and they manipulated the data and is a garbage study, unfortunately you had the chance to just say "yeah that poll has sketchy data" and then looked into other sources like above came back with them and posted that you stand by your belief and all this other sources back them up and it would of ended 15 posts ago. Because again Remy this was all based on a Joke post that I dont care about.
But your vortex doesnt allow you to act rationally, your vortex doesnt care how stupid it makes you look. So your vortex doesnt allow you to say "yeah the data looks sketchy" like a normal human would. Instead you are forced to attempt to defend something you know is wrong, you are still doing it.. you are attempting to show that its impossible to get 32% conservatives with 69% trans which is factually not true.
1021 participants,
700 in the woman/trans category = 68.56% rounded up to 69%
699 trans (1 woman removed) = 68.46% still rounded up to 69%
321 men = 31.43% rounded down to 31%
you need a total of 1 "trans" person to be "slightly conservative" to bring the total up to 323
323 men/women +1 conservative trans = 31.63% rounded up to 32% conservatives
(20-30% of the LGBTQ+ vote republican, so dont try and argue that it cant happen)
Another Vortex failure.. And thats basing this on them being honest with the breakdown % which they have shown to not be trustworthy and we should completely ignore what they have shown.
I told you 10 posts ago to just let this one go, its a non winner for you.. fight your vortex, you dont even technically have to change your position, you get to still feel the same way and have legitimate backing to your position. I dont care about your position, im just making fun of your vortex.
