- Joined:
- Aug 23, 2012
- Posts:
- 13,032
- Liked Posts:
- 3,971
pointing at schedules as factors is stupid, teams often unexpectably omprove, remember, Houston was considered a weak opponent entering last year and a couple other teams as well
- Joined:
- Aug 23, 2012
- Posts:
- 13,032
- Liked Posts:
- 3,971
Schwartz was worse, but Patricia was the worst of all as well as Morningway
- Joined:
- Aug 10, 2013
- Posts:
- 40,299
- Liked Posts:
- 37,571
- Location:
- Cumming
One of you took the bait. The other didn’t. Not a surprise you didn’t. But the fish guy did.
- Joined:
- Nov 27, 2014
- Posts:
- 20,148
- Liked Posts:
- 4,836
I already won the argument, you seem confused. Show me some facts to back up your lame ass statement, I already provided mine.
- Joined:
- Aug 10, 2013
- Posts:
- 40,299
- Liked Posts:
- 37,571
- Location:
- Cumming
No you didn’t. End thread. You lose. Last time I saw a face like yours, it had a hook in it. Bait thread loser.
- Joined:
- Nov 27, 2014
- Posts:
- 20,148
- Liked Posts:
- 4,836
Ok dumbass, if you are going to make an argument, at least get your facts straight,
The Lions beat the Rams...der duh.
They lost to the Cowboys by one point on a controversial call.
Oh, and they beat the Chiefs, you know, the team that WON the superbowl?
- Joined:
- Nov 27, 2014
- Posts:
- 20,148
- Liked Posts:
- 4,836
Show me the facts loser, put up or shut up?
You lost, until you can prove otherwise, deal with it.
Maybe you might want to post the rule book and get made to look a fool yet again?
- Joined:
- Aug 10, 2013
- Posts:
- 40,299
- Liked Posts:
- 37,571
- Location:
- Cumming
You must be confused. Everyone here considers you to be the fool of the message board.
- Joined:
- Nov 27, 2014
- Posts:
- 20,148
- Liked Posts:
- 4,836
I am waiting for the proof. Show me your facts. Any failure to do so is just more egg on your face, because you have no proof, just talking out of your ass.
Last edited:
Canth
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Mar 23, 2016
- Posts:
- 4,403
- Liked Posts:
- 6,078
Oh yeah, that was my bad - I glanced too quick. They lost to Seattle on the 2nd place schedule in the regular season. They beat the Rams in the playoffs.
So, both of us were not quite right.
And yes, they beat the Chiefs in the 1st game of the first game season. Personally, I doubt that would happen again, given the chance. But doesn't matter, they did.
The question is not whether or not the Lions had a great 2023 - they obviously did.
The question is: Can they repeat winning the NFC North? They literally have never done that before. It's damn hard to have sustained success in the NFL which why the teams that do it stand out.
- Joined:
- Nov 27, 2014
- Posts:
- 20,148
- Liked Posts:
- 4,836
This is what you said
"If the Lions continue to lose the 3 games that makes their schedule different, "
They lost to the Ravens And Cowboys. That is two, not three. They beat the Bucs....twice. They beat the Rams. They beat the Chiefs.
But thanks pointing out the Lions schedule last year was not as easy as you are trying to make it out to be.
Canth
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Mar 23, 2016
- Posts:
- 4,403
- Liked Posts:
- 6,078
And they did lose the 3 games that make the schedule different. I erroneously said it was the Rams in the first post. I corrected it that it was Seattle in the reply.
So yes, the Lions lost the 3 game that made it a 2nd place schedule last year: That was the Ravens, Cowboys, and the Seahawks.
And again, I was wrong about the Rams bit. I am talking regular season. They did not play the Rams in the regular season, they did beat them in the playoffs.
Sorry for the confusion.
- Joined:
- Nov 27, 2014
- Posts:
- 20,148
- Liked Posts:
- 4,836
Canth
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Mar 23, 2016
- Posts:
- 4,403
- Liked Posts:
- 6,078
Oh FFS, that is not what I am saying.
I am simply pointing out that spotting 3 losses again likely makes it difficult to repeat as NFC North division champs.
I am not saying they can't do it, obviously they did last year. But it's a new year and it's generally difficult to repeat unless you have a truly dominant team and/or QB. And I think the Lions have a lot to prove on that front.
I think the entire NFC North has legit improved as a whole over last season, so it's going to be a slugfest for whoever wins it. The NFC itself is still on the weaker side, so I actually rather expect the NFCN to put a couple of teams into the playoffs again.
msadows
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Aug 23, 2012
- Posts:
- 28,231
- Liked Posts:
- 23,193
Huh, they dominated them for like 90% of both games last year. Did you go senile and forget? Dementia? Alzheimer's?
- Joined:
- Aug 23, 2012
- Posts:
- 13,032
- Liked Posts:
- 3,971
did you forget they still split, what good is dominating 90% of a game if you shit the bed and lose it anyway. dementia, Alzheimers or stupidity
msadows
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Aug 23, 2012
- Posts:
- 28,231
- Liked Posts:
- 23,193
That was last season, they still dominated the lions with fields. I expect the same this season, bears have pretty much had the lions card the last 2 years. Caleb will shit on that team.
Goff always shits the bed vs. chicago.
- Joined:
- Aug 23, 2012
- Posts:
- 13,032
- Liked Posts:
- 3,971
fify
- Joined:
- Aug 23, 2012
- Posts:
- 13,032
- Liked Posts:
- 3,971
that QB led his team to 17 points in the last 3 minutes while the bears defense shit their pants
msadows
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Aug 23, 2012
- Posts:
- 28,231
- Liked Posts:
- 23,193
Now look at every other game. He sucks in big games , cold weather, and versus the bears.
There is a reason the rams traded him old man, cause he's not good enough to win a big game. Definition of mid QB
Staff online NOW
-
bamainatlantaYou wake him up, you keep him up