Nothing is that simple. Orlando had better rebounding and defense and the best PG at that point. Dallas had Dirk but the Magic also had better shooters as a whole and a better secondary play-maker (Hedo) than what Dallas had.
i'll give you rebounding..but defense is pretty equal....orlando had a better FG defense but dallas had a better PPG defense..
stackhouse,terry,dirk, and harris are all very good 3 point shooters along with anthony johnson and a few others
who's going to guard dirk? lewis? that would be a terrible matchup...
orlando's defensive advantage is mitigated a bit by the fact that howard, who is the primary reason they had a good defense, will be facing dampier and an offense that relies on shooting
josh howard and jason terry aren't as good or better play makers than hedo? really?
nelson's not a great PG..he's a good shooter but never really was a PG imo
i brought up that the magic went to the finals in a crappy east because,looking at your list, i assumed it was a large part of your reasoning because great teams that had bad match ups or flamed out in the postseason were heavily penalized