OT: Ranking the 30 Best NBA teams from 2000-'12

CODE_BLUE56

Ded
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '20
Joined:
Apr 18, 2010
Posts:
19,725
Liked Posts:
4,699
Location:
Texas
Mario Chalmers closed the gap on Kidd and surpassed him this season IMO.

LeBron>>>>>>2011 Dallas SF

Wade>>>Terry/Stevenson

Battier also helped the Heat a lot this postseason.

A healthy Haslem as well.

yep, he's a huge addition with this defense, 3 point shooting, and his incredible IQ

he made some huge plays for miami in the finals

#finalsmvpbasedgod
 

RamiTheBullsFan

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 16, 2010
Posts:
9,505
Liked Posts:
1,733
exactly..he's the main reason the mavs won that series

and if it hadn't been for that crazy comeback in miami...the heat would have been up 2-0..at one point they were up 2-1

with lebron in 2012 working in the post and actually showing up for the finals..that poses all kinds of problems for the mavs

But the 2011 Mavericks are better than the 2012 Thunder. Especially on defense and rebounding (plus an actual fundamentally-sound offense).

They defended LeBron the right way.

LBJ has improved a lot in the post and LBJ is also forcing the issue and not afraid to shoot crunch-time free-throws.

However, the Mavericks zoned up on LBJ and made him think twice before putting the ball on the floor. LBJ chose to defer bit you better believe it would have been a lot harder to score on Dallas than OKC. Dallas was putting up a perimeter curtain on LBJ with Kidd/Marion/Stevenson and had an anchor underneath in the form of Tyson Chandler (who is better than Ibaka... trust me).
 

thechosenone

Well-known member
Joined:
Jan 14, 2012
Posts:
3,421
Liked Posts:
698
Location:
Greece
Nah so many print-screens and I am really bored.

I did it 3 more times.
Bulls - Heat 3-4
Bulls - Heat 1-4
Bulls - Heat 4-2

You can do it as many times as you want. My point is you can't use this to decide which team is better.
 

CODE_BLUE56

Ded
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '20
Joined:
Apr 18, 2010
Posts:
19,725
Liked Posts:
4,699
Location:
Texas
But the 2011 Mavericks are better than the 2012 Thunder. Especially on defense and rebounding (plus an actual fundamentally-sound offense).

why do you always bring up rebounding? OKC was a better rebounding team
they averaged a good 2 rebounds more than dallas did

defense was pretty close...dallas had better defensive efficiency but the thunder were 3rd best in the league in field goal defense

dallas doesn't really have a stopper like thabo nor a shot blocker like ibaka and isn't as athletic on defense

dallas did have chandler though

OKC was clearly better on offense...


They defended LeBron the right way.

correct...they used a bit of zone and wanted him to take shots

part of it was his mental game...i understand what guys like cuban are saying but his argument, as i saw it, was too much on the other side of the spectrum

the idea is, that yes dallas made the right adjustments defensively but the reason lebron didn't post up or drive alot is not totally predicated on dallas' zone(you have to remember even with the zone, there are susceptible spots...especially with a less athletic defense like the mavericks)

it partly had to do with this mentality(omg ESPN cliche)...he was just not looking to drive or post up at all...

LBJ has improved a lot in the post and LBJ is also forcing the issue and not afraid to shoot crunch-time free-throws.
well, the whole idea is that last year he didn't use the post, thus, did not exploit a huge matchup problem that lebron can cause when he is in the post

the free throw difference is big too..you can't tell me that's not partly on his improving mentality


However, the Mavericks zoned up on LBJ and made him think twice before putting the ball on the floor. LBJ chose to defer bit you better believe it would have been a lot harder to score on Dallas than OKC. Dallas was putting up a perimeter curtain on LBJ with Kidd/Marion/Stevenson and had an anchor underneath in the form of Tyson Chandler (who is better than Ibaka... trust me).

lebron posted up more against the thunder than put it on the floor..and he put it on the floor more when he could exploit a matchup or was in transition

in another thread, i have already highlighted some serious match up problems that can occur with lebron in the post, with marion defending(either with zone or man), that might help a little..but lebron is still easily strong than he is and could get marion into foul trouble

i'm not sure how well a zone would do against lebron posting up...from there if the zone put attention on him..he could pass out for a 3..or move the ball with flow to find an open shot or a drive

problem is you have an anchor like chandler, but when you have dirk at the PF that is a liability on defense

with OKC, you're usually running perkins and ibaka, who are both great defenders

ibaka vs. chandler is certainly debatable..ibaka is not as good individually but literally every single player that comes in the post has to respect his ability which alters shots in themselves

plus, you have to assume that dallas won't be running zone every play...they'll run variants and switch back to man on some occasion

dallas is basically 3 point shooters,marion chandler and dirk...

they don't really have a great inside game or a driving game

OKC has drivers and creators like westbrook and harden...and a scorer like durant who i trust more than i do dirk
 
Last edited:

CODE_BLUE56

Ded
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '20
Joined:
Apr 18, 2010
Posts:
19,725
Liked Posts:
4,699
Location:
Texas
Nah so many print-screens and I am really bored.

I did it 3 more times.
Bulls - Heat 3-4
Bulls - Heat 1-4
Bulls - Heat 4-2

You can do it as many times as you want. My point is you can't use this to decide which team is better.

you can, should you? not really..i already pointed out it was flawed

did you alternate home and away? that's important

home team gets a little boost while away team gets undercut a bit

they should have a neutral setting

i think what it shows is that perhaps the teams are pretty closely matched..and it would depend alot on context on which team would win
 

ChiIllini22

New member
Joined:
Jun 22, 2010
Posts:
133
Liked Posts:
17
Isnt this about the best NBA teams not teams that had success during playoffs.

2011-2012 Bulls should've been on here.
 

CODE_BLUE56

Ded
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '20
Joined:
Apr 18, 2010
Posts:
19,725
Liked Posts:
4,699
Location:
Texas
Isnt this about the best NBA teams not teams that had success during playoffs.

2011-2012 Bulls should've been on here.

you have to provide a medium..

there are some good regular season teams that are not on there that have a case

there are also some teams who did well in the playoffs who really shouldnt be on there
 

CODE_BLUE56

Ded
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '20
Joined:
Apr 18, 2010
Posts:
19,725
Liked Posts:
4,699
Location:
Texas
I find it pretty funny myself that the 2008 Celtics of all teams is being brought up to help defend the 2012 Heat.

Look at what the old-man version (with a better version of Rondo and MUCH weaker bench [2008 bench was STAKED]) did to the 2012 Heat. I am pretty confident in my belief that the '08 Celtics would not lose to the 2012 Heat no matter how many series they played.

The Celtics took the Hawks very lightly in that first round series and that was the main reason they were taken to 7 games. Then, the Cavs took them to 7 which was a series I didn't get to see because of working and going to school non-stop. I know LeBron had an amazing game 7 and they still lost.

Then the Lakers (easily the best team of the 3) lost to Boston in 6.

the old man version of the celtics took the heat to 7 because they didn't have bosh for a big while

the celtics took the hawks lightly? ehh..that's kind of a weak excuse

the cavs, you said yourself, weren't really built for the playoffs(which i agree with) yet somehow took the mighty celtics to 7

the celtics had to surmount a huge comeback in LA to really ice the series

would have been a completely different series had LA kept the lead

BTW i'm not using the celtics to defend the heat, so i assume you're not referring to me
 

nwfisch

Hall of Famer
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '21
Joined:
Nov 12, 2010
Posts:
25,053
Liked Posts:
11,503
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Minnesota United FC
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Notre Dame Fighting Irish
Maybe the 12 Heat aren't as strong 1-12 as some of the teams on the list, but their #2 guy is better than a lot of twos on this list besides Kobe to Shaq.
 

BullsFan_1

New member
Joined:
May 10, 2010
Posts:
130
Liked Posts:
18
Why would you put the 05 pistons over the 04 pistons? And the 04 Lakers over both of them?

...That makes no sense.
 

JosMin

Entirely too much tuna
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '22
Joined:
Nov 22, 2011
Posts:
8,201
Liked Posts:
3,271
Location:
Jeffersonville, Indiana
Nash is arguably better offensively than even LeBron or Wade individually back then because of his superior passing and shooting combined with that dribble penetration and killer floater

Paging FirstTimer and RorySparrow.... Paging FirstTimer and RorySparrow.
 

Top