Quintana Is NOT The Answer

Status
Not open for further replies.

nickofypres

Super Nintendo Chalmers
Donator
Joined:
Jun 14, 2010
Posts:
7,127
Liked Posts:
3,072
Location:
Los Angeles, CA
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago White Sox
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Toledo Rockets
Exactly. Who gives a shit that Floyd has an xERA that's good? Not once has he gotten his real ERA close to that.

ERA is such a poor tool to judge a pitcher. An ERA will raise a lot faster than it'll fall, not to mention that your ERA depends on whether something is a hit or an error if it leads to a run being scored, which is a call made by another human being.

ERA+, xFIP, Siera, BABIP, are much better judges for a pitcher.


He just doesn't win games like we'd like. I'm fine with him as a 4 or 5. But I'd take the guy who wins games or gives the the Sox a good chance to win over the one that hasn't won but has a good projected ERA.

Ah, the old, "I'd rather have a guy who is 22-10 with a 5.00 than a guy whos 8-14 with a 2.45 ERA".

Wins is another useless statistic, as long as my pitcher can keep me in the game start after start, I'll take it.
 

TheChicagoFan

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Sep 15, 2010
Posts:
6,122
Liked Posts:
1,642
Location:
Misery
ERA is such a poor tool to judge a pitcher. An ERA will raise a lot faster than it'll fall, not to mention that your ERA depends on whether something is a hit or an error if it leads to a run being scored, which is a call made by another human being.

ERA+, xFIP, Siera, BABIP, are much better judges for a pitcher.




Ah, the old, "I'd rather have a guy who is 22-10 with a 5.00 than a guy whos 8-14 with a 2.45 ERA".

Wins is another useless statistic, as long as my pitcher can keep me in the game start after start, I'll take it.

Oh I agree. BABIP is mainly a test to see if the pitcher has been lucky or unlucky though. But otherwise those stats are way better.

I'm a hater of Wins as well. My point was that if the pitcher keeps them in the game, that's good enough for me.

I'm saying I'd rather have a guy who is 15-7 with a 4.50 ERA than the guy who has a 11-12 record and 5.50 ERA.
 

DewsSox79

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 24, 2010
Posts:
29,059
Liked Posts:
7,249
ERA is such a poor tool to judge a pitcher. An ERA will raise a lot faster than it'll fall, not to mention that your ERA depends on whether something is a hit or an error if it leads to a run being scored, which is a call made by another human being.

ERA+, xFIP, Siera, BABIP, are much better judges for a pitcher.




Ah, the old, "I'd rather have a guy who is 22-10 with a 5.00 than a guy whos 8-14 with a 2.45 ERA".

Wins is another useless statistic, as long as my pitcher can keep me in the game start after start, I'll take it.

yeah well floyd isnt 8-14 with a 2.45 era. il take high BABIPs all day long over thowing cookies to everyone.


Sent from my Asshole using Tapatalk
 

nickofypres

Super Nintendo Chalmers
Donator
Joined:
Jun 14, 2010
Posts:
7,127
Liked Posts:
3,072
Location:
Los Angeles, CA
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago White Sox
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Toledo Rockets
:dunno:

Sorry I use logic.
 

DewsSox79

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 24, 2010
Posts:
29,059
Liked Posts:
7,249
ERA is such a poor tool to judge a pitcher. An ERA will raise a lot faster than it'll fall, not to mention that your ERA depends on whether something is a hit or an error if it leads to a run being scored, which is a call made by another human being.

ERA+, xFIP, Siera, BABIP, are much better judges for a pitcher.




Ah, the old, "I'd rather have a guy who is 22-10 with a 5.00 than a guy whos 8-14 with a 2.45 ERA".

Wins is another useless statistic, as long as my pitcher can keep me in the game start after start, I'll take it.

xFIP is useless. 100% useless. BABIP is fine, but dont let that fool you as well since there have been a number of soft tossers that were very successful with high BABIPs. ERA+ is ok too.

But to say that quintana shouldnt be the 5th starter because of metrics and projections is rather stupid. Right now Floyd is bad, real bad. How do I know? By watching the ball leave the yard before the sox have a chance to bat over and over again. This is happening, to say he will get better due to metrics is a bit stupid. he is what he is right now, and thats bad. Lets stop with the excuses.
 

nickofypres

Super Nintendo Chalmers
Donator
Joined:
Jun 14, 2010
Posts:
7,127
Liked Posts:
3,072
Location:
Los Angeles, CA
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago White Sox
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Toledo Rockets
Floyd has a career ERA+ of 105 with the White Sox but zomg he suxks even though thats above average!!!1
 

nickofypres

Super Nintendo Chalmers
Donator
Joined:
Jun 14, 2010
Posts:
7,127
Liked Posts:
3,072
Location:
Los Angeles, CA
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago White Sox
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Toledo Rockets
xFIP is useless. 100% useless. BABIP is fine, but dont let that fool you as well since there have been a number of soft tossers that were very successful with high BABIPs. ERA+ is ok too.

Hey, guy, if you don't like them, that's cool.

But to say that quintana shouldnt be the 5th starter because of metrics and projections is rather stupid.

Never said he shouldn't. Don't put words in my mouth.

Right now Floyd is bad, real bad. How do I know? By watching the ball leave the yard before the sox have a chance to bat over and over again. This is happening, to say he will get better due to metrics is a bit stupid. he is what he is right now, and thats bad. Lets stop with the excuses.

Floyd has good starts, Floyd has bad starts. He's streaky.

His first 7 starts were mostly great. His last 5 we're mostly crap.

Floyd has a track record of being boss in June and July. If August first rolls around and he still has an ERA of 6 (not that ERA matters), then I'll admit I'm wrong, and join your side.
 

nickofypres

Super Nintendo Chalmers
Donator
Joined:
Jun 14, 2010
Posts:
7,127
Liked Posts:
3,072
Location:
Los Angeles, CA
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago White Sox
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Toledo Rockets
The Bill James Handbook doesn't count as logic. Trusting what your eyes see in a player counts.

Let me guess, you think grindyness is a stat too right?
 

nickofypres

Super Nintendo Chalmers
Donator
Joined:
Jun 14, 2010
Posts:
7,127
Liked Posts:
3,072
Location:
Los Angeles, CA
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago White Sox
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Toledo Rockets
Last 5 games:

41 hits
30 ER
10 Meatballs
10.42 ERA
OPS 1.116

its all unlucky right? metrics show he will get better right? cmon now. lets be real.

He also has a .388 BABIP in those last 5 starts but, ZOMG GUYS, HE'S SUCKS AND HAD AIDS!!!1

Come on Dews, you're a lot better than this.
 

GaelicSoxFan

Time Lord
Donator
Joined:
Nov 9, 2010
Posts:
2,997
Liked Posts:
1,153
Location:
Midlothian, IL
Here's the scouting report on Floyd: Lay off the stuff that's just out of the strike zone and eventually he'll throw a fat one.
 

Capt. Serious

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 17, 2010
Posts:
19,670
Liked Posts:
6,438
Location:
Chicago
Here's the scouting report on Floyd: Lay off the stuff that's just out of the strike zone and eventually he'll throw a fat one.

Ready..

x336.jpg
 

nickofypres

Super Nintendo Chalmers
Donator
Joined:
Jun 14, 2010
Posts:
7,127
Liked Posts:
3,072
Location:
Los Angeles, CA
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago White Sox
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Toledo Rockets
:andruw:

You guys sound like Score callers.
 

DewsSox79

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 24, 2010
Posts:
29,059
Liked Posts:
7,249
Let me guess, you think grindyness is a stat too right?

trying to misdirect from his original post much?

what his eyes see dont lie right now. his actual stats dont lie right now. xFIP for 1 is not known to be true which again as I explained to CO is not considered a stat. There used to be a debate with Randy Wells last year in the cubs forum, and xFIP was used in his defense that randy wells is good, how did that work out? there isnt one metric that is reliable for projections only past stats and trends can one go by. It is very easy to take a shitty player and cherry pick some metrics to make you think you won an arguement.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top