- Joined:
- May 12, 2010
- Posts:
- 49,010
- Liked Posts:
- 27,573
She's on her third set of attorneys.
You're way too smart to be veiled victim shaming.
She's on her third set of attorneys.
You're way too smart to be veiled victim shaming.
When are you and HeHateMe?U and Italianbeef should get drinks one day.
How is it victim shaming?
When are you and HeHateMe?
April? Shit.Mullens in April, bro.
You're insinuating (yes you are) she's retaining lawyer after lawyer just as a money grab. Meanwhile there are no actual facts available at this time.
Nope. If anything, I think it speaks volumes when the first two sets of lawyers look at the case and tell her it can't be won.
Doesn't mean she wasn't raped. Lack of evidence doesn't mean lack of action.
I never said anything that took any side on the matter whether she was actually drugged and raped, as she claims.
No. I'm saying women throw themselves at Rose all day. It just seems far fetched as it is currently laid out.
So you would like woman that have been raped to have one more thing to worry about. If They cant prove the rape not only will they have been raped but possibly face jail time?
Rose had someone else do his SATs.
Anyone who thinks he is some well behaved model citizen is fooling themselves.
For all the talk of "victim shaming", I see no one has a problem shaming the accused. "Not a model citizen", "power ego trip", "Kane put himself in a bad situation", "he drinks too much and is too loose". JFC, the lead reporter on the story for the Buffalo News had this to say about Kane on Chicago radio the day he broke the story:
"A person who, let's face it, also has a bit of a track record. If you were to ask me when I woke up this morning to name three people in sports....Uh, I'm gonna tell you today that somebody's going to be investigated for rape, how long would it take for you to get to Patrick Kane? I mean, this is a guy who is out there in public doing things in a sloppy manner for the course of his career. He's been in court before, he's had allegations levied at him before...uh, take a look at Deadspin, you know, all the different things...he lives his life in a very loose and carefree manner."
This is the inherent unfairness in the system - the accused will never get his good name back even if no charges are filed, and the accuser has her civil case built in the media for months if no charges are filed.
For all the talk of "victim shaming", I see no one has a problem shaming the accused. "Not a model citizen", "power ego trip", "Kane put himself in a bad situation", "he drinks too much and is too loose". JFC, the lead reporter on the story for the Buffalo News had this to say about Kane on Chicago radio the day he broke the story:
"A person who, let's face it, also has a bit of a track record. If you were to ask me when I woke up this morning to name three people in sports....Uh, I'm gonna tell you today that somebody's going to be investigated for rape, how long would it take for you to get to Patrick Kane? I mean, this is a guy who is out there in public doing things in a sloppy manner for the course of his career. He's been in court before, he's had allegations levied at him before...uh, take a look at Deadspin, you know, all the different things...he lives his life in a very loose and carefree manner."
This is the inherent unfairness in the system - the accused will never get his good name back even if no charges are filed, and the accuser has her civil case built in the media for months if no charges are filed.
Just a FYI. This is not a Kane thread.
If you want to talk about Kane and his situation, you know where to go.