The Phil Jackson / Q comparison is worthless, IMO.... The NBA has what is a much more superstar driven league and the Bulls had the best player of all time. The NHL is much more team oriented and is the hardest playoffs to go through, hence why you see a lot more "dynasties" in the NBA as opposed to the NHL. They are too different to compare.
I also find it funny that some of you are ripping on Q all of a sudden.... Because he benched the untouchable "Stalgod." Gimme a break. No one was complaining about the average PP during their first place regular season. No one was complaining about the PP as they beat the Wild 4-1. Now, after a 3rd liner gets benched when one of our best playoff performers comes back from injury, people want to fire Q? Rofl, that logic makes no sense to me. If any discussion should be going on about "Stalgod" being benched it should be praise for Bowman for bringing in a ridiculous amount of depth and for Q's ability to coach said depth up and to stick with people like Saad, who had a disappointing first 8-10 games and could have been benched early on.
IMO - this whole conversation reeks of spoiled fans.