houheffna
Ignoring Idiots
- Joined:
- May 6, 2009
- Posts:
- 8,673
- Liked Posts:
- 2,711
Okay, I will put it to rest like this...Wilt was physically a dominant player mainly because he was friggin huge...and he would be now if he was the same size, he also had a lot of skill and ability on both sides of the court.
That said, I personally would take Shaq over Russell if I had to pick between the two, as well as other players because they were better in my opinion. MVPs were brought up...high jumping...and old grainy footage and people calling people pussies all came into the argument...I don't give a damn...if you look at Shaq and Russell and say, give me Russell...that's you...I will never do that. Russell to me is not a top 5 center based on talent. Now based on accomplishments? He is arguably the best ever, of any player...he has a great resume...but Wilt was the best player in basketball in that era by quite a margin in my opinion. And he would be a great player today...just don't feel that way about Russell at all.
Just my opinion...
That said, I personally would take Shaq over Russell if I had to pick between the two, as well as other players because they were better in my opinion. MVPs were brought up...high jumping...and old grainy footage and people calling people pussies all came into the argument...I don't give a damn...if you look at Shaq and Russell and say, give me Russell...that's you...I will never do that. Russell to me is not a top 5 center based on talent. Now based on accomplishments? He is arguably the best ever, of any player...he has a great resume...but Wilt was the best player in basketball in that era by quite a margin in my opinion. And he would be a great player today...just don't feel that way about Russell at all.
Just my opinion...