Stanley Cup Final IGT: Game 3 - Blackhawks @ Lightning 6/8 at 7:00 p.m.

[italianbeef]

Please use the mulit quote feature.

No.

 

[Shantz My Pants]

Just proves how idiotic the media is. You don't need "proof or evidence" for this argument. The bottom line is Hossa missed a wide open net which likely cost us the game. You don't get very many glorious scoring chances, especially in the playoffs. When you do get them though, they need to be buried or they will come back to haunt you, like in Game 3.

You back track way too much. First it was the loss fell amongst Hossa and 6 others, now it's a "Hossa likely blew us the game".

You are right though, you don't need "proof or evidence" for this argument if you want to just look like someone who doesn't know what their talking about.

I have nothing else to add to this discussion as it's been a one way street. If you plan on posting things in the future, especially on a message board with knowledge people in regards to the topic, be prepared to defend your opinion with actually reason and facts. I mean, if you can't do that, just write in your diary or on Twitter.





Sent from my Texas Instrument Calculator

 

[CRM 114]

You're putting too much emphasis on one play.

Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk

It was a big play though. One that likely cost us the game.

 

[CRM 114]

You back track way too much. First it was the loss fell amongst Hossa and 6 others, now it's a "Hossa likely blew us the game".

You are right though, you don't need "proof or evidence" for this argument if you want to just look like someone who doesn't know what their talking about.

I have nothing else to add to this discussion as it's been a one way street. If you plan on posting things in the future, especially on a message board with knowledge people in regards to the topic, be prepared to defend your opinion with actually reason and facts. I mean, if you can't do that, just write in your diary or on Twitter.





Sent from my Texas Instrument Calculator

Two things

1. You don't need facts and evidence for this argument. Just common sense. Typically when a team has prime scoring opportunities and they don't capitalize on them, it bites them in the ass. When the Hawk have a wide open net to shoot at twice as well as 8-9 other high scoring chances, you have to put the game away. Hawks didn't and it cost them. This is common knowledge if you're a hockey fan (or player for that matter)

2. I don't have a Twitter or diary, so I'll stay here.

 

[Shantz My Pants]

Two things

1. You don't need facts and evidence for this argument. Just common sense. Typically when a team has prime scoring opportunities and they don't capitalize on them, it bites them in the ass. When the Hawk have a wide open net to shoot at twice as well as 8-9 other high scoring chances, you have to put the game away. Hawks didn't and it cost them. This is common knowledge if you're a hockey fan (or player for that matter)

2. I don't have a Twitter or diary, so I'll stay here.

Jesus, this is depressing. You contradicted your argument in your first point. "8-9 other high scoring chances", so why don't blame the entire 18 skaters then instead of Hossa or Teuvo? Also, please don't tell me what common knowledge is, because what you're spewing is one of the most rare and unheard of pieces of bullshit I've ever read about game 3 and Hossa.

You have nothing to bring to the table outside of a comment with no backing or proof. I've laid it out to you perfectly, which nobody else seems to have disagreed with but actually agreed with, yet I'm wrong because I didn't get the "common knowledge"?






Sent from my Texas Instrument Calculator

 

[CRM 114]

Jesus, this is depressing. You contradicted your argument in your first point. "8-9 other high scoring chances", so why don't blame the entire 18 skaters then instead of Hossa or Teuvo? Also, please don't tell me what common knowledge is, because what you're spewing is one of the most rare and unheard of pieces of bullshit I've ever read about game 3 and Hossa.

You have nothing to bring to the table outside of a comment with no backing or proof. I've laid it out to you perfectly, which nobody else seems to have disagreed with but actually agreed with, yet I'm wrong because I didn't get the "common knowledge"?






Sent from my Texas Instrument Calculator

Because Hossa had by far the best scoring chance.

 

[Shantz My Pants]

Because Hossa had by far the best scoring chance.

Genius!!


Sent from my Texas Instrument Calculator

 

[CRM 114]

Genius!!


Sent from my Texas Instrument Calculator

I certainly am.

Please stop trolling now.

 

[Shantz My Pants]

I certainly am.

Please stop trolling now.

How is it trolling when you provide factual and reasonable arguments in a discussion and asking for someone else to explain their statement in the same manner on a message board? I mean what's even the point to post shit if you can't have a discussion on it in a logical manner?

IRL if you say something and someone disagrees is your rebuttal "It's that way because it's common sense". If that was the case, we would still believe you could fall into space if you ride a boat far enough in the ocean cause the world can't be round...


Sent from my Texas Instrument Calculator

 

[Chief Walking Stick]

How is it trolling when you provide factual and reasonable arguments in a discussion and asking for someone else to explain their statement in the same manner on a message board? I mean what's even the point to post shit if you can't have a discussion on it?


Sent from my Texas Instrument Calculator

I have to agree with tribar here. You shouldn't be trolling on your birthday.

 

[Shantz My Pants]

I have to agree with tribar here. You shouldn't be trolling on your birthday.

About 1 month late.


Sent from my Texas Instrument Calculator