Stanley Cup Final IGT: Game 4 - Blackhawks @ Lightning 6/10 at 7:00 p.m.

Shantz My Pants

New member
Joined:
Dec 10, 2014
Posts:
3,923
Liked Posts:
787
Literally nothing you said is true. I don't want to be anyone's "mini me"

Just because it doesn't make sense to you doesn't mean it doesn't make sense. I do know hockey, otherwise I wouldn't be here. Replace hockey with basketball or soccer and you're statement is true. I'm also not trying to be a troll. I thought Hossa had a huge blunder in Game 3. I shared my thoughts on this and you and several others blasted me for it. It doesn't mean I'm a troll or that I don't know hockey.

You make an awful large amount of assumptions about someone you barely know.

We blasted you because when trying to discuss it you just say it's "common knowledge". I don't think you understand what type of hockey knowledge some of us have and while it may seem cocky to you, many of us IHN merger posters come from a forum where if you say something, you need to be prepared to back it up. Typically this is how arguments and discussions (civilized) work.

If I said the sky was red, you would ask me WTf I'm talking about. I would then say why I think that. You would then rebuttal and we would have a discussion. Or I could say "It's just common sense" and bring nothing to the table and end the discussion in a asinine way.


Sent from my Texas Instrument Calculator
 

DMelt36

Bolland > You
Joined:
May 27, 2010
Posts:
13,969
Liked Posts:
8,434
Then this is the worst message board in the history of the internet.

We aim to please.

20631b3db04f3e337f79f0be708301bb.jpg
 

BlackHawkPaul

Fartbarf
Donator
Joined:
Sep 28, 2010
Posts:
5,997
Liked Posts:
2,338
Location:
Somewhere in Indiana
We blasted you because when trying to discuss it you just say it's "common knowledge". I don't think you understand what type of hockey knowledge some of us have and while it may seem cocky to you, many of us IHN merger posters come from a forum where if you say something, you need to be prepared to back it up. Typically this is how arguments and discussions (civilized) work.

If I said the sky was red, you would ask me WTf I'm talking about. I would then say why I think that. You would then rebuttal and we would have a discussion. Or I could say "It's just common sense" and bring nothing to the table and end the discussion in a asinine way.


Sent from my Texas Instrument Calculator

Don't bother.
Anyway, how about Sharp's game tonight?
Maybe a spark under his butt?
 

Chief Walking Stick

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
May 12, 2010
Posts:
47,886
Liked Posts:
26,376
Then this is the worst message board in the history of the internet.

p.s. Hey, can you do that #calledit thing again? ZOMG it's awesome every time you do it!

Don't you have another forum to be permabanned from for offering absolutely nothing?

You're pretty much bottom 3 poster on CCS.
 

Spunky Porkstacker

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Jun 6, 2010
Posts:
15,741
Liked Posts:
7,308
Location:
NW Burbs
tribar;2181474[B said:
]I'm very disappointed in this team.[/B]

Hawks win!

Saad and it's 2-1!

Why is this so hard for people to understand?

So are you disappointed still ? I'm guessing you probably are still hanging on to Hossa missing the empty net while being tripped. :gary: You have set yourself apart from a lot of posters that have come and gone over the years, you take the cake for that I applaud you. :clap:
 

italianbeef

New member
Joined:
May 17, 2015
Posts:
822
Liked Posts:
167
Or I could say "It's just common sense" and bring nothing to the table and end the discussion in a asinine way.

And then call all who disagree trolls and call for them to be banned.

Tribar practices the Saul Alinsky style of arguing - shout loudly and try to silence the opposition.
 

Shantz My Pants

New member
Joined:
Dec 10, 2014
Posts:
3,923
Liked Posts:
787
Don't bother.
Anyway, how about Sharp's game tonight?
Maybe a spark under his butt?

It was better, but I've seen him play much better on a consistent basis.

I would think a guy who has some inclination that he's going to be gone in the offseason would give it everything he's got going out.

Or maybe he's injured.


Sent from my Texas Instrument Calculator
 

BlackHawkPaul

Fartbarf
Donator
Joined:
Sep 28, 2010
Posts:
5,997
Liked Posts:
2,338
Location:
Somewhere in Indiana
It was better, but I've seen him play much better on a consistent basis.

I would think a guy who has some inclination that he's going to be gone in the offseason would give it everything he's got going out.

Or maybe he's injured.


Sent from my Texas Instrument Calculator

Sharp will be gone.
Bickell. Gone.
Not sure about anyone else.
I know the Crawford 6 million is an albatross, but can they trust anyone not wearing 50 at the moment?

Watch-- now game 5 will be 9-6.
 

Shantz My Pants

New member
Joined:
Dec 10, 2014
Posts:
3,923
Liked Posts:
787
Sharp will be gone.
Bickell. Gone.
Not sure about anyone else.
I know the Crawford 6 million is an albatross, but can they trust anyone not wearing 50 at the moment?

Watch-- now game 5 will be 9-6.

I think the stats of Emery, Raanta and Darling over the years just shows that the team in front can make an average goalie look good.

6 mill for a goalie seems absurd to me for what we will need in cap space for 16 other skaters.


Sent from my Texas Instrument Calculator
 

DMelt36

Bolland > You
Joined:
May 27, 2010
Posts:
13,969
Liked Posts:
8,434
The postgame analytics report can be found here, if you're into that type of thing.

It's not pretty. First game this series where Tampa is fully in favor of most of the stats.

If you're looking for an encouraging sign, it's that the Versteeg-Richards-Kane line appears to have had the most possession for Chicago. That hadn't happened before.
 

Top