- Joined:
- Aug 20, 2012
- Posts:
- 37,894
- Liked Posts:
- 41,222
Do people forget Paea is a free agent. He is not even on the team.
I was talking about in terms in re-signing him.
Do people forget Paea is a free agent. He is not even on the team.
I haven't watched any of Fangio's defense yet but Dan Durkin did and writes that Fangio runs a two-gap scheme up front with linebackers that play one gap. So if what Durkin writes is true, then it would make this article essentially factually incorrect that there are one-gap principles shared by both Fox and Fangio, not that Fox is even going to bother running the defense or implementing his scheme.
The three down linemen play two-gap responsibility, which means they’re attacking the player they’re lined up across from (opposed to one-gap, where defensive linemen attack the space in between offensive linemen), reading his leverage and occupying the immediate gaps to their left and right. The four-technique ends attack the offensive tackles, while the zero-technique attacks the center.
Also,incorrect is the statement that Del Rio leans 3-4 when he comes from the Tony Dungy defensive philosophy.
http://chicago.cbslocal.com/2015/01/22/durkins-playbook-breaking-down-vic-fangios-defensive-scheme/
I haven't watched any of Fangio's defense yet but Dan Durkin did and writes that Fangio runs a two-gap scheme up front with linebackers that play one gap. So if what Durkin writes is true, then it would make this article essentially factually incorrect that there are one-gap principles shared by both Fox and Fangio, not that Fox is even going to bother running the defense or implementing his scheme.
The three down linemen play two-gap responsibility, which means they’re attacking the player they’re lined up across from (opposed to one-gap, where defensive linemen attack the space in between offensive linemen), reading his leverage and occupying the immediate gaps to their left and right. The four-technique ends attack the offensive tackles, while the zero-technique attacks the center.
Also,incorrect is the statement that Del Rio leans 3-4 when he comes from the Tony Dungy defensive philosophy.
http://chicago.cbslocal.com/2015/01/22/durkins-playbook-breaking-down-vic-fangios-defensive-scheme/
He's wrong. Fangio ran mostly 1-gap 3-4. He did run some traditional 2-gap 3-4, but mostly ran a 1-gap according to most of what I've read.
Interesting that everyone is saying Durkin is wrong, especially given that Fangio came from the Dom Capers and Dick LeBeau coaching tree...
Worng again. http://www.denverpost.com/ci_21672566/broncos-defense-features-classic-4-3-scheme-pass
Also, everything I have read, seen, & been told, tells me that Fangio runs a 1 gap. 49ers didn't have space eaters to run a 2 gap front.
Del Rio coached to his personnel, but he's a 4-3 guy and always has been. Mel Tucker developed his 4-3 philosophy under Del Rio in Jacksonville. If you think Del Rio is a 3-4 guy than you're an even bigger moron than I thought.
Keep crying Biff.
well he ran the niners defense for the last 4 years and so it's not like it's speculation. fangio does a lot of different things. he never ran a full time 2 gap scheme. he used some 2 gap concepts but his defense in san fran is closer to a one gap 4-3 under then a traditional 2 gap 3-4. his front was definitely not a two gap. he had a 305 pound nose tackle last year(ian williams). ends in a 2 gap 3-4 are essentially tackles...that was not what he did in san fran either.
again, because he ran such a versatile scheme in san fran it's hard to predict exactly what he's going to do...and also fox will probably have input but if his time in san fran is any indicator, you'll see a lot more one gap concepts then two gap concepts from fangio.
Interesting that everyone is saying Durkin is wrong, especially given that Fangio came from the Dom Capers and Dick LeBeau coaching tree...
Whatever you say hipster Emo boy.