beckdawg
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Oct 31, 2012
- Posts:
- 11,750
- Liked Posts:
- 3,741
Tanaka to the dodgers makes no sense to me. Basically it means they'd have to then deal Beckett and likely Billingsley. I suppose you can make the argument it's a way to restock some of their farm system after using a lot of it to get the Red Sox players but they would be negotiating at a disadvantage because everyone would know they had to trade someone. It's actually a worse situation than they already have in the OF. At least there the guys are playing well. Beckett had a 5.19 ERA last year and a 4.65 ERA the year before. Billingsley is coming off an injury.
Frankly, if this does happen I'd love to see the cubs work a package deal of some sort for Billingsley and Either with the Dodgers eating some money. BIllingsley is going to be 29 and is a decently #3/4. Either will be 32 but if they could get the Dodgers to eat $11 mil of his deal you'd essentially have him at $15 mil/year for 4 years and then also have his 5th year $2.5 mil buy out covered. Billingsley, if healthy would give you another arm in case you trade Shark and you would also have additional space
Frankly, if this does happen I'd love to see the cubs work a package deal of some sort for Billingsley and Either with the Dodgers eating some money. BIllingsley is going to be 29 and is a decently #3/4. Either will be 32 but if they could get the Dodgers to eat $11 mil of his deal you'd essentially have him at $15 mil/year for 4 years and then also have his 5th year $2.5 mil buy out covered. Billingsley, if healthy would give you another arm in case you trade Shark and you would also have additional space