- Joined:
- Aug 21, 2012
- Posts:
- 19,159
- Liked Posts:
- 12,239
Were you stoned?
Please don't watch Part 2. This kind of a movie isnt made for someone like you.
This is not a circa 2014 formula movie running 90 minutes.
There is an important story to be told and it take a certain amount of time to tell it. What parts should have been taken out?
Please don't watch Part 2 and spare yourself the agony of watching it and the agony of us listening to your critique
Were you stoned?
It means that some people don't get it. You judge movies by length which is very odd. Now if you say the movie was too long then you should be able to identify what made it too long. After all those were your words.What's that supposed to mean?
I know. That's why it wasn't complete garbage.
No particular scene immediately comes to mind.
Man, you're bitter. Why are you on a message board if you can't take criticism?
It means that some people don't get it. You judge movies by length which is very odd. Now if you say the movie was too long then you should be able to identify what made it too long. After all those were your words.
Probably best for you to stick to Will Ferrell and Vince Vaughn movies
It means that some people don't get it. You judge movies by length which is very odd. Now if you say the movie was too long then you should be able to identify what made it too long. After all those were your words.
Probably best for you to stick to Will Ferrell and Vince Vaughn movies
I was speechless when I first read his "critique".some people enjoy movies but not films. Those people should not critique films like they would critique movies. Some people dont even know what 'critique' even means.
What we have here is a case of criticism of a film, as if it were a movie.
I was speechless when I first read his "critique".
I do not judge movies by length. Titanic is one of my favorite movies and it's even longer than this one. On the other hand I have seen an movie that was only an hour and ten minutes long and it was terrible (I forget what it was called)
I hate Vince Vaughn and am not a big Will Ferrell fan. So nice try.
I watched the first one for the first time today. Decent story that could but IMO the movie could have been alot shorter and still got the point across. Wasn't terrible, wasn't great. I was expecting alot more from it.
Is it worth watching the second one?
I was speechless when I first read his "critique".
Being speechless doesn't mean my fingers can't type.And yet you were able to rant and rave about it.
Hell yes dammit.I watched the first one for the first time today. Decent story that could but IMO the movie could have been alot shorter and still got the point across. Wasn't terrible, wasn't great. I was expecting alot more from it.
Is it worth watching the second one?
Disregard this and watch it anyway.Please don't watch Part 2. This kind of a movie isnt made for someone like you.
This is not a circa 2014 formula movie running 90 minutes. There is an important story to be told and it take a certain amount of time to tell it. What parts should have been taken out?
Please don't watch Part 2 and spare yourself the agony of watching it and the agony of us listening to your critique
Titanic is one of my all time favorites as well.
http://reactiongif.org/wp-content/uploads/GIF/2014/08/GIF-****-you-laugh-laughing-Fred-Rogers-Screw-you-Middle-Finger-Pointing-Finger-GIF.gif
sorry man, huge fan of Leonardo. and I just like the entire movie. everything about it. even the soundtrack.
**** you.
sorry man, huge fan of Leonardo. and I just like the entire movie. everything about it. even the soundtrack.
**** you.
I have no problem with Leo. The Departed is a good movie. Inception had it's moments, but Titanic is a movie made for 13 year old girls.
sorry man, huge fan of Leonardo. and I just like the entire movie. everything about it. even the soundtrack.
**** you.