The I Miss Nate Robinson Thread

[clonetrooper264]

Well played sir

:andruw:

 

[ChiSoxCity]

He is a complete waste of money...after five games? Have you ever watched a full 82 game NBA season in your damn life? Are you serious? If he is a waste of money...what does that make Noah? Deng? Butler? Rose?

The question is...when is the last time Robinson gave ANYBODY 15-20 ppg off the bench? It was when he played 30mpg for D'Antoni! Do everyone a favor and quick making shit up. A hint that you are way off? Dick2keva agrees with you....when that happens...run!

Are you kidding me? Can you fucking read or what? Two posts ago in bold letters, I told you Robinson scored 24 points off the bench just last week.

I think we've pinpointed your problem here: you have extremely poor reading comprehension. That explains why you're so fucking confused all the time.

 

[ChiSoxCity]

Dude...you raise more hell than anybody on this forum. I was calling him that BEFORE YOU EVER POSTED HERE. Now you wanna be Mohatma Ghandhi? After threatening gang violence on half the board? Don't let me tell you where you can stick your "peace"....you are better off minding your own business.

Ah damn, shit just got real up in dis bish, son. It's about to go down (with some Yo-Yo Ma, Ectasy of Gold playing in the background). :admin:

 

[scottiepippen1994]

What do you do with Hinrich? Better defender, better point guard...higher paid...sit there?

Yes, Kirk can sit.
Just like he does half of every season when one of his bones break or arms fall off.
Besides, doesnt matter if he gets payed. If you suck or are injured you sit...
Rose sat and got payed.
Boozer sat and got payed.
Both Noah and Deng sat right after the biggest contracts of there lives.
Your argument is pointless.
Hey, Thibbs even played Nate more than Kirk when kirk wasnt hurt. lol

Ill bet you Kirk sits down alot more this season than Nate does too.

And your dumbass "higher payed" question is just laughable.
When Tony Kucoc first came to the Bulls, wasnt he payed more than Scottie Pippen?
Well Yes, yes he was........Hey, who played more minutes?

Right, thats what i thought.

Thanks again for coming.

 

[scottiepippen1994]

Yeah, we don't understand why your answer to a team who is sucking offensively...is to bring in a player who sucks offensively!

Nate sucked offensively?
Really, wow.
Who told you that shit?, Lol.

Nate was one of the very few that didnt suck offensively on last seasons Bulls team and it wouldnt be any different with this team that also sucks offensively.

Your view or eyesight is pretty fucked up man.
But i enjoy your antics and comedic so called NBA phd you display and show off daily as if you really believe its real or are to ashamed to admit it to yourself that it is not.
I really do, and im thankful for your funny presence here....You are a bag of laughs....Ha.....HaHa....HeeHaaHaahaaa!
All circus's need clowns and CCS is no exception... your better than Ringling and Baily bros and you work for..................FOR FREE...:rolling: Great deal for all of us. Thanks man. :clap:
But someone must of forgot to tell you that theres no such thing as an NBA diploma or phd.

Now that you know because i TOLD YOU once again, you can put away that fake ass phd and diploma that someone gave you out of there cracker jack box.
Its not real, and dont be mad at me because someone woke you up early on April Fools Day to give it to you.
Its probably the same person that lied to you about Nate Robinson sucking offensively.

 

[scottiepippen1994]

Who are you talking about dude???

 

[scottiepippen1994]

Okay...going to shock some people here...

The Bulls will win 58 games and be the 2nd seed in the East. They will face Miami in the ECF and beat them...why? Because Wade is deteriorating rapidly. After a whole summer of rehabilitation...he still can't get that knee healthy. So I have the Bulls facing San Antonio in the Finals...and losing in the Finals.

MVP will be Lebron James...media will want to give it to Durant...but Lebron is putting up historic numbers at this point in his career. He is much better than anyone else in the league. Haven't given much thought yet to other awards.

You have quite an imagination.
This isnt a video game man.

:andruw:

I thought id bump this post of yours from 2 weeks ago.
You said the Bulls will basicall beat the Heat in a 7 game series.
Now you say the Bulls cant beat indiana or the Heat?

And your excuse 2 weeks ago is because Wade is deteriorating?
LoL, so far Wade is playing better and looking healthier than last season.

Too late to change your post now.

Pull your computer over and put your hands up where i can see them.

Now step away from your computer.

Your under arrest.

 

[houheffna]

Are you kidding me? Can you fucking read or what? Two posts ago in bold letters, I told you Robinson scored 24 points off the bench just last week.

I think we've pinpointed your problem here: you have extremely poor reading comprehension. That explains why you're so fucking confused all the time.

What are his season averages??? That is what he most likely will give you off the bench. When you average under 10ppg, 24 points is what we call an aberration. You said the Bulls could use his 15-20ppg...did you not? He doesn't give ANYBODY that type of scoring off the bench! Stop the madness.

And you still won't answer the question...if he is such an adept scorer...to the point that he could be so instrumental to a team's success...why is it that he wasn't pursued by more teams???

 

[houheffna]

Nate sucked offensively?
Really, wow.
Who told you that shit?, Lol.

Nate was one of the very few that didnt suck offensively on last seasons Bulls team and it wouldnt be any different with this team that also sucks offensively.

Your view or eyesight is pretty fucked up man.
But i enjoy your antics and comedic so called NBA phd you display and show off daily as if you really believe its real or are to ashamed to admit it to yourself that it is not.
I really do, and im thankful for your funny presence here....You are a bag of laughs....Ha.....HaHa....HeeHaaHaahaaa!
All circus's need clowns and CCS is no exception... your better than Ringling and Baily bros and you work for..................FOR FREE...:rolling: Great deal for all of us. Thanks man. :clap:
But someone must of forgot to tell you that theres no such thing as an NBA diploma or phd.

Now that you know because i TOLD YOU once again, you can put away that fake ass phd and diploma that someone gave you out of there cracker jack box.
Its not real, and dont be mad at me because someone woke you up early on April Fools Day to give it to you.
Its probably the same person that lied to you about Nate Robinson sucking offensively.

The guy that gave me that phd...Gave you your degree in "GANGSTA"! All of your "points" are nonsensical and based on you wanting to post pictures and misspelling words. You are this site's version of a rodeo clown. So have at it. Nobody takes you seriously anyway.

 

[scottiepippen1994]

The guy that gave me that phd...Gave you your degree in "GANGSTA"! All of your "points" are nonsensical and based on you wanting to post pictures and misspelling words. You are this site's version of a rodeo clown. So have at it. Nobody takes you seriously anyway.

 

[Axl Rose]

hue is still acting like nate is useless huh?

 

[ChiSoxCity]

What are his season averages??? That is what he most likely will give you off the bench. When you average under 10ppg, 24 points is what we call an aberration. You said the Bulls could use his 15-20ppg...did you not? He doesn't give ANYBODY that type of scoring off the bench! Stop the madness.

And you still won't answer the question...if he is such an adept scorer...to the point that he could be so instrumental to a team's success...why is it that he wasn't pursued by more teams???

You need help, son. So I'm gonna tell you what I told you yesterday in bold letters:

I heard he might get a few starts due to injuries, must not have panned out. In any event, look at his individual game stats so far this season.

In his second game against portland, Nate shot 47% from the field and 66.7% from the 3-pt arc, scoring 24 pts and 7 rebounds in 29 minutes of play.

In Denver's fourth game of the season against ATL, Nate shot 45.5% from the field and 66.7% from the 3-pt arc again, scoring 15 pts with 3 rebounds, 3 assists and a steal in 20 minutes of play.

When he gets 20-30 minutes per game, he contributes substantially. Your concerns about his field goal percentage are unfounded. He clearly exceeds 38% FG shooting with substantial minutes on the court.

I do admit he's an emotional, passionate guy so you can't leave him out there too long. He tends to try to do too much and gets out of control, which is why he'll never be a true starter. But I digress... look at his individual game stats for once!!!. My "lazy analysis" of facts beats your nonsensical opinion every day of the week!

Stop acting Special person, Nate is a reserve PG with Denver, so he hasn't gotten significant minutes yet, but when he does, AS INDICATED BY HIS GAME STATS, he scores points with ease. I don't even know why I'm still debating this with you. This is common knowledge to everyone who owns a tv and watched the Bulls last year.

 

[ChiSoxCity]

hue is still acting like nate is useless huh?

 

[ChiSoxCity]

LOL!!!

Kick his head in! Stomp on his balls! Piss on his face!

 

[houheffna]

You need help, son. So I'm gonna tell you what I told you yesterday in bold letters:



Stop acting Special person, Nate is a reserve PG with Denver, so he hasn't gotten significant minutes yet, but when he does, AS INDICATED BY HIS GAME STATS, he scores points with ease. I don't even know why I'm still debating this with you. This is common knowledge to everyone who owns a tv and watched the Bulls last year.

And you suck at common sense........

If he was such a hot commodity....he would have gotten more attention, from more general managers. You don't even need a television for that type of rationale. You can look at individual games for a lot of players in the NBA...its about consistency.

But most importantly, your idea seems to be to cut into Rose or Butler's minutes? Right now, Rose plays 32 mpg, destined to go up as he improves. Butler plays about the same amount. Kirk is there, say what you want, he can do more for a team night in and night out than Nate can when he is healthy...you have one of the better backup guards in basketball on the roster...Nate has no role on the team. What is so hard to understand about that???

 

[scottiepippen1994]

Scoring points has no roll on this team? really?
When Kirk is healthy?................So we have a better player for half a season? okay i undstand now.


Kirk is more consistent?

:andruw:

 

[houheffna]

Scoring points has no roll on this team? really?
When Kirk is healthy?................So we have a better player for half a season? okay i undstand now.


Kirk is more consistent?

:andruw:

Kirk IS MORE CONSISTENT! And he is a better basketball player. He can play both sides of the court, can guard three positions and can run an offense. Nate can't do those things. At best Nate Robinson is an erratic scorer, the rest of the league knows that...that is why he didn't garner as much attention across the league as he does on this forum.

 

[scottiepippen1994]

Kirk IS MORE CONSISTENT! And he is a better basketball player. He can play both sides of the court, can guard three positions and can run an offense. Nate can't do those things. At best Nate Robinson is an erratic scorer, the rest of the league knows that...that is why he didn't garner as much attention across the league as he does on this forum.

Whats the point of having 2 players that can run an offense on a poor offensive team?
:derbulls:
Oh yeah, Teague has also shown flashes of being capable of running an offense.
So there, we have 3 offensively capable distributers as pointguards.
The problem is we need more offensive recievers, or players who can create there own distrubution to score themselfves when our main pointguuard(derrick rose) is double or triple teamed.

You are aware that so far this season, all of our opponants plan is to just double or triple team Rose and then the rest of the team offensively shuts down.

In this situation, Nate would be useful.

Stop being so biased and use your good sense.
Nobody here had claimed Nate a superstar or savior.
What we are saying is that Nate has a useful specialty that helps.
Usually the team with the most points wins....Usually......

Also when Thibbs runs a smaller lineup or rests Rose, and play both Kirk and Nate in the backcourt at the same time for spare minutess.
This was proven effective through stretches of last season.

IF ROSE GOES DOWN FOR ANY REASON THIS SEASON, where are the Bulls going to get enough points to win games?

Nate was good insurence...

Especially in Rose's absence.......Which helped keep us respectable.

You seriously cant deny these facts, but i dont expect you to acknowlege it.
You dont have to.
Im cool either way.

 

[scottiepippen1994]

What i do NOT understand about Hues argument in refference to Kirk, is that he is acting as if this is 2007 Kirk Hinrich.
Kirk is only a shell of his old self.
He still has handles, he is still a good defender, but his shooting sucks, hes injured all the time, he holds the ball too much, and how can Hue say hes better on both sides of the floor when his offensive scoring abilities are as significant as Kieth Bogans.

IF this was 2006 or 7 Kirk, then Hue would have a very good argument.
Kirk back in the day absoluetly was a better all around playe than Nate and id take him over Nate.
But those times have long passed.
Its 2013.

2013 Nate Robinson > 2013 kirk hinrich.

2006 KIRK HINRICH > 2013 nate robinson.

Understand?

What year is it today, not yesturday.

Is Nate a stellar defender? Well no.
But is he as bad of a defender as B.G? NO.
For one of the tiniest players in NBa history, Nate isnt horric at defense.
At least his heart doesnt allow him to not put in the effort defensively.


1 more question that is well, kind of important.

Whos more CONSTISTENT staying healthy? Nate or Kirk?

Got to be on the court to help your team win games.

 

[houheffna]

What i do NOT understand about Hues argument in refference to Kirk, is that he is acting as if this is 2007 Kirk Hinrich.
Kirk is only a shell of his old self.
He still has handles, he is still a good defender, but his shooting sucks, hes injured all the time, he holds the ball too much, and how can Hue say hes better on both sides of the floor when his offensive scoring abilities are as significant as Kieth Bogans.

IF this was 2006 or 7 Kirk, then Hue would have a very good argument.
Kirk back in the day absoluetly was a better all around playe than Nate and id take him over Nate.
But those times have long passed.
Its 2013.

2013 Nate Robinson > 2013 kirk hinrich.

2006 KIRK HINRICH > 2013 nate robinson.

Understand?

What year is it today, not yesturday.

Is Nate a stellar defender? Well no.
But is he as bad of a defender as B.G? NO.
For one of the tiniest players in NBa history, Nate isnt horric at defense.
At least his heart doesnt allow him to not put in the effort defensively.


1 more question that is well, kind of important.

Whos more CONSTISTENT staying healthy? Nate or Kirk?

Got to be on the court to help your team win games.

Nate's idea of a good defensive play...is flopping. Something he is excellent at. I am smart enough to know that Kirk isn't the same guy he was in 2007. But he does more for your team RIGHT NOW than Nate does. Plain and simple.