The Official Cubs Argument Thread (Keep The Flaming Here)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Jntg4

Fire Forum Moderator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 26, 2010
Posts:
26,017
Liked Posts:
3,297
Location:
Minnesota
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago White Sox
  2. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Fire
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Chicago State Cougars
  2. DePaul Blue Demons
  3. Illinois-Chicago Flames
  4. Loyola Ramblers
  5. Northern Illinois Huskies
  6. Northwestern Wildcats
I may have the power, but unfortunately posting shitty metrics and displaying stupidity isn't a bannable offense.

Degrading CCS to below PSD status is though.
 

Rice Cube

World Series Dreaming
Donator
Joined:
Jun 7, 2011
Posts:
18,077
Liked Posts:
3,472
Location:
Chicago
I'm reasonably certain that if he says something about PSD being better than CCS one more time, whether it's true or not, that is a bannable offense.
 

Uman85

Oh Yeah.
Donator
Joined:
Apr 10, 2011
Posts:
16,341
Liked Posts:
5,990
I'm reasonably certain that if he says something about PSD being better than CCS one more time, whether it's true or not, that is a bannable offense.

Then I'll keep my eyes peeled. :shifty:
 

DewsSox79

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 24, 2010
Posts:
29,059
Liked Posts:
7,249
I'm reasonably certain that if he says something about PSD being better than CCS one more time, whether it's true or not, that is a bannable offense.

Have you banned anyone other than a spammer?
 

Jntg4

Fire Forum Moderator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 26, 2010
Posts:
26,017
Liked Posts:
3,297
Location:
Minnesota
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago White Sox
  2. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Fire
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Chicago State Cougars
  2. DePaul Blue Demons
  3. Illinois-Chicago Flames
  4. Loyola Ramblers
  5. Northern Illinois Huskies
  6. Northwestern Wildcats
I'm reasonably certain that if he says something about PSD being better than CCS one more time, whether it's true or not, that is a bannable offense.

:yep:
 

CODE_BLUE56

Ded
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '20
Joined:
Apr 18, 2010
Posts:
19,725
Liked Posts:
4,699
Location:
Texas
cant find the thread..but there WAS a really great thread on this board that dealt with some jaggoff from PSD that got absolutely pummeled

although, apparently he was one of the better ones there

again, PSD is a cess pool....you are entitled to your opinion i guess
 

Captain Obvious

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Jul 31, 2010
Posts:
4,967
Liked Posts:
697
Yeah, I'm pretty sure that it's a big no-no to say bad things about CCS because if Rush gets a hold of this, Rush gets mad.

I'm pretty sure I've had this talk with Rush, actually.
you.still.dont.get.it.

and you wonder why people here rip you all day long

No, I don't wonder. I know it's because they are all like you and can't see proof when it is right in front of them.

If a stat has a higher correlation to runs, then that means it is more reliable, thus better. Is that so hard for your brain to process?

He can post at both, but if he decides he is going to be a little rep for PSD and defend it here and say its better or what have you.....he will be gone....only a matter of time.

Oh no!

I may have the power, but unfortunately posting shitty metrics and displaying stupidity isn't a bannable offense.

Shitty metrics? They are shitty because they correlate to runs better than anything you use? Is that why they are shitty or??
 

DewsSox79

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 24, 2010
Posts:
29,059
Liked Posts:
7,249
I'm pretty sure I've had this talk with Rush, actually.


No, I don't wonder. I know it's because they are all like you and can't see proof when it is right in front of them.

If a stat has a higher correlation to runs, then that means it is more reliable, thus better. Is that so hard for your brain to process?



Oh no!



Shitty metrics? They are shitty because they correlate to runs better than anything you use? Is that why they are shitty or??

what are you even debating? way to steer away from the specific subject. again, metrics alone are a horrible way to evaluate a player. is it really that hard? once it sinks into that twirpy head of yours that metrics are NOT to be used alone you will be fine.
 

Rush

**** it, Go Deep
Staff member
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '19
Joined:
Apr 16, 2010
Posts:
13,285
Liked Posts:
7,400
Location:
North Carolina
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Carolina Hurricanes
  1. Duke Blue Devils
Is it really better than PSD? Or are you just saying that because here you and your other we todd did friends can make fun of CO and no one calls you out for it, but if you did that at PSD, you'd get your poop hole reamed? No way CCS' Cubs forum is better than PSD's.

You're more then welcome to **** off in their Cubs forum.
 

icehogfan08

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 23, 2010
Posts:
5,227
Liked Posts:
1,551
Location:
Rockford, IL
I'm not saying that. I'm not saying that at all. I don't give a **** if someone disagrees with me. But as dewey & jowcawks evidence time and time again, they don't have to back up their opinions with anything. At PSD that shit doesn't fly. But here it does. Additionally, it's like a fucking sin if you mention anything about WAR, UZR, any advanced metric here. People here reject that, but they don't refute it.

:tiptoe:
thats why they are the cawk bros.
 

DewsSox79

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 24, 2010
Posts:
29,059
Liked Posts:
7,249
:tiptoe:
thats why they are the cawk bros.

you taking CO's side is quite funny. shouldnt you be worried about trying to obtain another player with "grit". your humor is stale, and is far from funny. you need to dig a little deeper and try to come up with something a little bit more creative.
 

Rush

**** it, Go Deep
Staff member
Donator
CCS Hall of Fame '19
Joined:
Apr 16, 2010
Posts:
13,285
Liked Posts:
7,400
Location:
North Carolina
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago Cubs
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Carolina Hurricanes
  1. Duke Blue Devils
The funny thing is CO would have been banned 50 times over at PSD for even the smallest of stuff he's posted on here.
 

Rice Cube

World Series Dreaming
Donator
Joined:
Jun 7, 2011
Posts:
18,077
Liked Posts:
3,472
Location:
Chicago
The funny thing is CO would have been banned 50 times over at PSD for even the smallest of stuff he's posted on here.

You are a wise and benevolent leader. We shall sing your praises to the stars and throughout the interwebs.
 

icehogfan08

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 23, 2010
Posts:
5,227
Liked Posts:
1,551
Location:
Rockford, IL
you taking CO's side is quite funny. shouldnt you be worried about trying to obtain another player with "grit". your humor is stale, and is far from funny. you need to dig a little deeper and try to come up with something a little bit more creative.

When did I take his side? I just said your a cawk like we have called you two for months you dope, moron, meatball.

And we don't need a grit player just a offensive minded forward and defender.
 

DewsSox79

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 24, 2010
Posts:
29,059
Liked Posts:
7,249
When did I take his side? I just said your a cawk like we have called you two for months you dope, moron, meatball.

And we don't need a grit player just a offensive minded forward and defender.[/QUOTE]



bold 1- cawks brothers really isnt that great, might as well stay with a more generic type of response like mine with the dope,moron, idiot etc.......they do more justice in the post than cawks brothers.

bold 2-
Looks like more grit will need to be added at the deadline
,,,
 

icehogfan08

CCS Donator
Donator
Joined:
Apr 23, 2010
Posts:
5,227
Liked Posts:
1,551
Location:
Rockford, IL
When did I take his side? I just said your a cawk like we have called you two for months you dope, moron, meatball.

And we don't need a grit player just a offensive minded forward and defender.[/QUOTE]



bold 1- cawks brothers really isnt that great, might as well stay with a more generic type of response like mine with the dope,moron, idiot etc.......they do more justice in the post than cawks brothers.

bold 2- ,,,

The grit was in regards to Carcillo. As I stated I thought he would get 10+ games
 

nickofypres

Super Nintendo Chalmers
Donator
Joined:
Jun 14, 2010
Posts:
7,127
Liked Posts:
3,072
Location:
Los Angeles, CA
My favorite teams
  1. Chicago White Sox
  1. Chicago Bulls
  1. Chicago Bears
  1. Chicago Blackhawks
  1. Toledo Rockets
I don't feel like reading through all that mess, but if we're debating SABRmetrics, I'd like to throw my opinion out there. I'm a firm believer in SABRmetrics myself and I they're just as important as tradition stats. Obviously some carry more weight than others, but they shouldn't be tossed aside. I think CO is full of shit a lot of times, but I do like use of metrics.

But, if I missed the whole point of the debate, just ignore.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top