- Joined:
- Jun 15, 2010
- Posts:
- 46,583
- Liked Posts:
- 35,826
My favorite teams
My point, again...still remains.In that case, you said Sheed was the first... I'd say Robert Horry was.
Unless like Clone said you want to consider Lucus or Bird.
My point, again...still remains.In that case, you said Sheed was the first... I'd say Robert Horry was.
Unless like Clone said you want to consider Lucus or Bird.
Lucas was definitely one of the first big men who could really shoot it. There was no 3pt line in his era though so it's really difficult to say so for sure.I can't speak to Lucas, but no way could Bird be considered a 4. Not with McHale next to him. Either way, my point remains; the concept of the stretch 4 isn't some new thing.
You mean to tell me you've never seen Thibs make a halftime adjustment or any kind of in game adjustment?Spo was never a great coach (although i give him props on the defense...only defense ive ever seen that annoyed me just watching it) he is a championship coach because of his team
as far as thibs adjustments he never makes them on the fly.....no matter how the game is going he sticks to the script on his gameplan...its set in stone
You mean to tell me you've never seen Thibs make a halftime adjustment or any kind of in game adjustment?
Then I think you're really not paying attention.as far as thibs adjustments he never makes them on the fly.....no matter how the game is going he sticks to the script on his gameplan...its set in stone
Then I think you're really not paying attention.
Lucas was definitely one of the first big men who could really shoot it. There was no 3pt line in his era though so it's really difficult to say so for sure.
In the case of Bird, he was definitely a SF for most of his career, but he could also definitely play the PF position. Interestingly, he started at PF ahead of McHale in the 1983 season and prior. McHale had been on the team for a couple years at that point: http://www.basketball-reference.com/teams/BOS/1983.html
Either way, yeah the stretch 4 is not a new thing by any means
Remember that game against the Heat in 2012 where Rose was like 1-17.. Thibs took him out for Watson at the end of the game. Watson hit the tying three to go to OT, Bulls ended up winning. I call that an adjustment.he hardly if ever makes in-game ones
1-10 from the field? **** it leave the lineup out there 5 more minutes
If the lineups are what you are talking about in regards to in game adjustments then I feel confident in saying that you aren't paying attention.he hardly if ever makes in-game ones
1-10 from the field? **** it leave the lineup out there 5 more minutes
Remember that game against the Heat in 2012 where Rose was like 1-17.. Thibs took him out for Watson at the end of the game. Watson hit the tying three to go to OT, Bulls ended up winning. I call that an adjustment.
I agree about not pigeonholing. I'm just saying Bird could be called a stretch 4 because of how he could play when McHale was not in the game. They did play at the same time for a majority of their time together, but it was not always the case.Well I harp on this at times, but it should be time to stop pigeonholing the offensive players by position. Dirk and Duncan play the same position, but do they play it the same way? Noah has shown the ability to lead a break, would you have confidence in Tiago Splitter doing the same?
Here's one from this season:lol that was 3 years ago
but ok you got me
![]()
People are aware there are more things you can adjust mid game than just the 5 players on the court, right?
trading Thibs will be the best mistake Bulls ever made
his defense is cooked now with the stretch 4's becoming a thing and he doesn't have any real strengths in other areas
he also shows no willingness to adapt so lets move on before hes totally exposed
well one i can point out he never seems to make an adjustment on is those stretch 4's i was talking about
you would think that night Draymond was killing us he woulda made sure Taj or whoever stay on him