Thread of List......CONSPIRACIES

[MDB111™]

The flight path indicated by the downed street lights was not only impossible for a plane to maneuver but well off the path reported by your witnesses and the path that would put it more on target for where it was said to hit. So who do you want to believe now, the official story or your witnesses? You can't believe both as they were very different flight paths. Also look at the hole in the wall...hahaha, way impossible. The Flight Data Recorder Analysis offered also conflicts greatly with the path provided in the official narrative and puts it at a height in which it was far above those street lights even if it had been on that path which it was not.

The story of the plane knocking down those lights used another odd, impossible story to support it. As the story goes when the plane hit one street light it flew through the windshield of a taxi being driven by Lloyd England. He said it went through the windshield and into the back seat. There were no pics of the street light in the car but plenty of his cab in the spot he was supposedly hit by it and we see a busted windshield but not so much as a single ding or scratch on the hood of the car. He was the Gene Rosen of the Pentagon strike. His story made no sense and could not be believed by anyone with sense but got a lot of news coverage. The story got funnier as England said a passer by helped him pull the street light out, again, not putting a scratch on the hood of the car while they performed this Herculean act. He was later interviewed and recorded by independents eventually unwittingly giving up that it was bigger than him and was a planned act.

A plane hits the Pentagon with tens of thousands of eyewitnesses and you dont believe the "official" story because some taxi driver didnt get his car scratched? And no one further added evidence to scratched car. It maybe because they were busy tending to the hundreds of peopke dying in a fire caused by a plane flying into the building?
Further more, were there not planes flown into the towers? So why is it impossible for you to believe one went into the Pentagon? How does that not add up for you?
Because there is no video evidence?

Not sure why "they" would use planes for all "their" plans but when it came to the Pentagon, "they" chose a missile?

 

[MDB111™]

Also,
Every imploding building video I have ever watched, they all are imploding from the bottom. But your story about the "first buildings in the world to collapse from fire at freefall" is collapsing from the top. Is this a new world first as well? implode buildings from the top? How is that possible?

You only seem to give me facts that support your story and you ignore all others.

Are you aware of the proximity of the Pentagon and Reagan national airport? Do you understand flight paths in general? Have you been to the site?

 

[MDB111™]

Where is the implosion debris that would typically litter an implosion site?

 

[run and shoot]

Gustavus and BearDen
Put me on your ignore list. I do not want any contact with you

 

[Warrior Spirit]

A plane hits the Pentagon with tens of thousands of eyewitnesses and you dont believe the "official" story because some taxi driver didnt get his car scratched? And no one further added evidence to scratched car. It maybe because they were busy tending to the hundreds of peopke dying in a fire caused by a plane flying into the building?
Further more, were there not planes flown into the towers? So why is it impossible for you to believe one went into the Pentagon? How does that not add up for you?
Because there is no video evidence?

Not sure why "they" would use planes for all "their" plans but when it came to the Pentagon, "they" chose a missile?

Really don't know what you're going on about and have seen nobody but you claim 1,000 witnesses and will remind you again the official story says those witnesses were all wrong. When faced with the impossible and obviously planted participants to sell the fables, you ignore it all and get emotional. Who said they used planes for all their plans? You believe they used planes for all their plans.

 

[MDB111™]

Really don't know what you're going on about and have seen nobody but you claim 1,000 witnesses and will remind you again the official story says those witnesses were all wrong. When faced with the impossible and obviously planted participants to sell the fables, you ignore it all and get emotional. Who said they used planes for all their plans? You believe they used planes for all their plans.

Who is enotional? Do you read and guess someones tone as well as guessing about eyewitnsses?
It was not thousands of eye witnesses but tens of thousands. At that time of day, with the Woodrow Wilson bridge construction going on, the traffic was insane. It is still insane to this day. No one bothered to collect further evidence of any sort of missile because the very idea is absurd. Insanely preposterous to think anything other than a plane hit the Pentagon when so many people saw it with their own 2 eyes.
I cannot stress enough how stupud the missile theory is regarding the Pentagon.

 

[Warrior Spirit]

Who is enotional? Do you read and guess someones tone as well as guessing about eyewitnsses?
It was not thousands of eye witnesses but tens of thousands. At that time of day, with the Woodrow Wilson bridge construction going on, the traffic was insane. It is still insane to this day. No one bothered to collect further evidence of any sort of missile because the very idea is absurd. Insanely preposterous to think anything other than a plane hit the Pentagon when so many people saw it with their own 2 eyes.
I cannot stress enough how stupud the missile theory is regarding the Pentagon.

So you assume thousands of witnesses when, in fact, only a few conflicting ones were ever pointed to. What's preposterous is to think commercial planes can penetrate and go through buildings like that while disintegrating. That's road runner science and why groups like Architects and Engineers and Pilots for 9/11 truth were formed. They know how ridiculous and impossible it all is. Why don't you?

 

[MDB111™]

So you assume thousands of witnesses when, in fact, only a few conflicting ones were ever pointed to. What's preposterous is to think commercial planes can penetrate and go through buildings like that while disintegrating. That's road runner science and why groups like Architects and Engineers and Pilots for 9/11 truth were formed. They know how ridiculous and impossible it all is. Why don't you?

They sound like they are terrible at their jobs.

It appears they have no deductive reasoning skills and further short sighted individuals eat it up and muddy the waters as to what really happened.

 

[Gustavus Adolphus]

Gustavus and BearDen
Put me on your ignore list. I do not want any contact with you

I don't understand, I thought I was on your ignore?

 

[run and shoot]

I don't know what happened at the Pentagon, but the WTC leaves a lotta questions


Seven hours after the explosive destruction of the World Trade Center Twin Towers, a third high-rise building was demolished (World Trade Center Building 7 (WTC 7) .
It was not hit by an airplane. The characteristic signs of controlled demolition were everywhere.


More than 2,700 Architects & Engineers are standing up to say that America and the world have been lied to.
The Smoking Gun of 9/11: The Building 7 Implosion

 

[Warrior Spirit]

Also,
Every imploding building video I have ever watched, they all are imploding from the bottom. But your story about the "first buildings in the world to collapse from fire at freefall" is collapsing from the top. Is this a new world first as well? implode buildings from the top? How is that possible?

You only seem to give me facts that support your story and you ignore all others.

Are you aware of the proximity of the Pentagon and Reagan national airport? Do you understand flight paths in general? Have you been to the site?

The towers were done differently, being so tall, while building 7 was more conventional. The loud explosion all spoke of first happening in the lobby of 1 of the towers was to weaken the inner structure before starting the top to bottom demolition. If you were to watch it you would see where the key parts were blown outward where the blasts occurred.

The flight paths were outlined in the official story and reference to other paths I mentioned. Not sure what you don't understand about that.

They sound like they are terrible at their jobs.

It appears they have no deductive reasoning skills and further short sighted individuals eat it up and muddy the waters as to what really happened.

So you know more about the construction of buildings than archicts and engineers. And you know more about flying planes than the most experienced pilots? Cool story.

 

[MDB111™]

The towers were done differently, being so tall, while building 7 was more conventional. The loud explosion all spoke of first happening in the lobby of 1 of the towers was to weaken the inner structure before starting the top to bottom demolition. If you were to watch it you would see where the key parts were blown outward where the blasts occurred.

The flight paths were outlined in the official story and reference to other paths I mentioned. Not sure what you don't understand about that.

So you know more about the construction of buildings than archicts and engineers. And you know more about flying planes than the most experienced pilots? Cool story.

and you believe that no plane could have been used where as planes were already used in connection at NYC.
You believe some taxi drivers car never got scratched, therefore this is a hoax by "they" but you never identify "they"
I wil consider them boogeymen until you elaborate.
you watched one video with people that claim to ve architects and engineers but could they not be crisis actor engineers?
The simple facts here are that you have your mind made up about something and are too pig headed to fathom being wrong about it.

So just so we are further apart in our thoughts, may I ask how many people(they) do yoy think were involved in this?
So there is a pilot out there who was called to shoot a missile into the Pentagon and he gets to carry that burden because America and all.
Umpteen explosives technicians working years to hide explosives throughout the towers. Countless higher ups. The list goes on and on....And for what purpose?
You have answered nothing regarding the why here.

 

[Chief Walking Stick]

Gustavus and BearDen
Put me on your ignore list. I do not want any contact with you

Lmao... poor cum and shyt... so dumb.

 

[Warrior Spirit]

and you believe that no plane could have been used where as planes were already used in connection at NYC.
You believe some taxi drivers car never got scratched, therefore this is a hoax by "they" but you never identify "they"
I wil consider them boogeymen until you elaborate.
you watched one video with people that claim to ve architects and engineers but could they not be crisis actor engineers?
The simple facts here are that you have your mind made up about something and are too pig headed to fathom being wrong about it.

So just so we are further apart in our thoughts, may I ask how many people(they) do yoy think were involved in this?
So there is a pilot out there who was called to shoot a missile into the Pentagon and he gets to carry that burden because America and all.
Umpteen explosives technicians working years to hide explosives throughout the towers. Countless higher ups. The list goes on and on....And for what purpose?
You have answered nothing regarding the why here.

You're so far off with everything, I don't know where to start. Rosen and England were pointed to as obvious plants to sell fables. That went right over your head. You ignore the impossible as if it isn't paramount to it all. Of course it is. If it's completely impossible for buildings to go into symmetrical free fall without the use of demolition, which it is, then there is no possible way the official story is true. Go ahead and tell me about this new Physics law you are apparently privy to that says a collapsing building will follow the path of most resistance going straight down through 200,000 tons of steel. Tell me how all those lights were knocked down by the Pentagon plane in an area that was not even close to the flight path later pointed to and in a pattern that would be impossible to navigate at 500mph+, as if that plane could even go that fast at such a low level. Tell me how it fit through that much smaller hole at the base of the Pentagon wall or even how it went that low at such high speed without losing control or making the smallest mark on the lawn in front of it. Tell me why you think commercial planes can go right through concrete and steel anyway. Tell me how a plane with a wingspan of over 100 feet can bury itself in a 20 foot crater in Shanksville and not be found. Tell me how you can make the impossible seem just a tiny bit plausible and then we can theorize about the who, why and how.

No need to worry about who had enough time to do this or that or why they chose the targets they did. No need to worry about why planes would be used here and not there. You have zero proof any planes were used, and I happen to subscribe to John Lear's theory. That last name sound familiar to you? Yeah, he knows some things about planes and flying them.

I've been pointing you to the impossible acts to show it's not just about theories. It's about what people were told being a total lie. You only seem eager to dance around the empirical evidence that shows the whole bullshit story couldn't possibly be true.

 

[Burque]

Gustavus and BearDen
Put me on your ignore list. I do not want any contact with you

Look at this motherfucker right here thinking he has a say in what information other people consume.... Smfh

 

[run and shoot]

Look at this motherfucker right here thinking he has a say in what information other people consume.... Smfh

Hey punk, why interact with someone who tells u to f*ck off. I wouldn't.

 

[Burque]

Hey punk, why interact with someone who tells u to f*ck off. I wouldn't.

How about you out them on your ignore list then. Kid.

Instead of giving them commands like an angry idiot.

 

[run and shoot]

How about you out them on your ignore list then. Kid.

Instead of giving them commands like an angry idiot.

They're on it and I wanna be on theirs. It's a valid request. No "anger"

 

[run and shoot]

You're so far off with everything, I don't know where to start. Rosen and England were pointed to as obvious plants to sell fables. That went right over your head. You ignore the impossible as if it isn't paramount to it all. Of course it is. If it's completely impossible for buildings to go into symmetrical free fall without the use of demolition, which it is, then there is no possible way the official story is true. Go ahead and tell me about this new Physics law you are apparently privy to that says a collapsing building will follow the path of most resistance going straight down through 200,000 tons of steel. Tell me how all those lights were knocked down by the Pentagon plane in an area that was not even close to the flight path later pointed to and in a pattern that would be impossible to navigate at 500mph+, as if that plane could even go that fast at such a low level. Tell me how it fit through that much smaller hole at the base of the Pentagon wall or even how it went that low at such high speed without losing control or making the smallest mark on the lawn in front of it. Tell me why you think commercial planes can go right through concrete and steel anyway. Tell me how a plane with a wingspan of over 100 feet can bury itself in a 20 foot crater in Shanksville and not be found. Tell me how you can make the impossible seem just a tiny bit plausible and then we can theorize about the who, why and how.

No need to worry about who had enough time to do this or that or why they chose the targets they did. No need to worry about why planes would be used here and not there. You have zero proof any planes were used, and I happen to subscribe to John Lear's theory. That last name sound familiar to you? Yeah, he knows some things about planes and flying them.

I've been pointing you to the impossible acts to show it's not just about theories. It's about what people were told being a total lie. You only seem eager to dance around the empirical evidence that shows the whole bullshit story couldn't possibly be true.

If u find any inside info. articles on what happen at the Pentagon, please share. MarylandBear111 had a valid question about why all this was done. I believe it was done to drag us into a war. What's your take?

 

[Ares]

They're on it and I wanna be on theirs. It's a valid request. No "anger"

Can you stfu? I need to read more Spartan 9/11 shit.