- Joined:
- Aug 20, 2012
- Posts:
- 4,379
- Liked Posts:
- 2,244
- Location:
- Chicago
Sopping.Nah, quit trying to justify ur shit take. His turnovers cost the game and his only success was with heavy run game vs prevent...but apparently it got u wet
- Joined:
- Aug 20, 2012
- Posts:
- 4,379
- Liked Posts:
- 2,244
- Location:
- Chicago
Also, "as shit." Shit QB play gets me wet.Nah, quit trying to justify ur shit take. His turnovers cost the game and his only success was with heavy run game vs prevent...but apparently it got u wet
- Joined:
- Aug 20, 2012
- Posts:
- 19,848
- Liked Posts:
- 11,057
- Location:
- Texas
I really hope Bagent succeeds, I just don't see it happening with Getsy and oline...that was already evident. Getsy left him in bad situations, yet people are happy about the prevent drive
Rise
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Aug 21, 2012
- Posts:
- 9,616
- Liked Posts:
- 9,270
- Location:
- Laughing at Tom Brady
Bagent is a pea shooter but because he plays fast the contrast will be refreshing. He will be better at what Fields is bad at, problem is he has a below average nfl arm which limits his overall ceiling.
- Joined:
- Jul 12, 2013
- Posts:
- 20,391
- Liked Posts:
- 14,282
- Location:
- The sewers
My favorite teams
This is spot on
People will fall in love for a game or two and then be disgusted with him as well
- Joined:
- Aug 20, 2012
- Posts:
- 4,379
- Liked Posts:
- 2,244
- Location:
- Chicago
Sounds like you wanna get wet, or is that a shit take?
- Joined:
- Aug 20, 2012
- Posts:
- 19,848
- Liked Posts:
- 11,057
- Location:
- Texas
Nah, just a reality take....Ill leave his two turnover performance, equaling Joe Montana level play, to the Bagent nuthugging crew.
I just would like to see a Qb in Chicago for once.
- Joined:
- Aug 20, 2012
- Posts:
- 4,379
- Liked Posts:
- 2,244
- Location:
- Chicago
There's probably gonna be an x v y QB forum for a while.
Everything is terrible. Let's see what terrible level Bagent is. I think I'm like 90% convinced Fields isn't it. Tiny bit of hope, just really don't think it's him.
Myk
85in25
- Joined:
- Sep 27, 2010
- Posts:
- 12,679
- Liked Posts:
- 5,263
That's an amazing take. As long as the underdog is as bad as the QB you don't like it's OK because they're the underdog sucking. LOL
Only Bears Fans could come up with that.
- Joined:
- Aug 20, 2012
- Posts:
- 4,379
- Liked Posts:
- 2,244
- Location:
- Chicago
Heh, actually I think only you could come up with that.
- Joined:
- Aug 20, 2012
- Posts:
- 34,252
- Liked Posts:
- 26,379
- Location:
- Any-Town, USA
My favorite teams
Meh. Bagent gets a pass. Can't expect a rookie backup from Shepherd to step in and tear up the NFL. See how he looks this week, and just sign a vet if he isn't ready.
Bearly
Guest
That he's worth more chances after getting actual starter practice reps. He's already way ahead of the curve considering where he came from and draft status. Doesn't mean he'll continue to develop but only one way to find out.
- Joined:
- Jul 12, 2013
- Posts:
- 20,391
- Liked Posts:
- 14,282
- Location:
- The sewers
My favorite teams
Classic case of an extremely low bar. He isn’t the answer and was never meant to be anyways.
“way ahead of the curve”
- Joined:
- Mar 1, 2015
- Posts:
- 34,172
- Liked Posts:
- 35,897
Bearly
Guest
So 1st rounders get 3 years but this kid gets less than 1/2 a game after his 1st time using pro concepts against an NFL D and never practicing with the ones? Got it.Classic case of an extremely low bar. He isn’t the answer and was never meant to be anyways.
“way ahead of the curve”
Nobody's crowned him. He looks better than he should even if the result was not great. He never held the ball too long, he distributed even if he didn't always make the best choice every time etc. He already manages the pocket better than Fields for instance. He deserves to be that next guy up as long as he needs to be and for the teams sake, it would be a lucky break if he shows he belongs.
Last edited by a moderator:
dennehy
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Dec 29, 2015
- Posts:
- 11,835
- Liked Posts:
- 12,886
- Location:
- Jewels to get a case of Squirt
Bagent won't be good, he's a DII undrafted rookie with a weak arm (by NFL standards) and average mobility. But I think he will probably show us where Fields struggles. And that is in his presnap ability to get quick easy stuff, and in his ability to just take what is there. He will also probably make a few huge mistakes.
Fields and Getsy had trouble figuring out protections and spotting blitzes. At least two of the sacks and probably more were from uncovered rushers and the protection wasn't changed at all, nor did Fields even look at the blitzer. Successful OCs and QBs don't do that regularly.
Fields and Getsy had trouble figuring out protections and spotting blitzes. At least two of the sacks and probably more were from uncovered rushers and the protection wasn't changed at all, nor did Fields even look at the blitzer. Successful OCs and QBs don't do that regularly.
Bearly
Guest
Getsy has his issues but spotting blitzes and uncovered rushers isn't on the OC.
dennehy
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Dec 29, 2015
- Posts:
- 11,835
- Liked Posts:
- 12,886
- Location:
- Jewels to get a case of Squirt
Figuring out protection is. There were some alarming plays where you have an OT picking up a blitzing S while Donta Foreman, who is a terrible blocker, taking a DE 1v1. That should never happen.
But yes, Fields inability to just get rid of the ball for 4 yards when a free rusher is coming is baffling.
Mighty Joe Young
Living in Troll's Heads Rent-Free for Decades
- Joined:
- Feb 8, 2021
- Posts:
- 11,952
- Liked Posts:
- 10,008
My favorite teams
I don't remember who on the score said it, but someone said we should expect Bagent to have a similar effect to Josh McCown when he came in for Cutler (Good comp because neither has a very strong arm), but then went on to explain why it would look like that in a way that makes sense when thinking back to when McCown stepped in.
He said that Bagent is going to be dumping the ball off a lot and basically will be in most situations throwing to his first read. He said they likely won't even allow him to get to, or much past his second read because they don't want to confuse him. It'll be boiled down into "either throw to A or do B". And that's it.
Said the offense is going to look a lot snappier because of that, but give it 3-4 games and defenses will catch on and take that away.
He said that Bagent is going to be dumping the ball off a lot and basically will be in most situations throwing to his first read. He said they likely won't even allow him to get to, or much past his second read because they don't want to confuse him. It'll be boiled down into "either throw to A or do B". And that's it.
Said the offense is going to look a lot snappier because of that, but give it 3-4 games and defenses will catch on and take that away.
didshereallysaythat
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Aug 14, 2011
- Posts:
- 21,347
- Liked Posts:
- 10,158
I really don't understand why people are not giving him a chance here. Like what do the Bears have to lose? They are 1-5 and Fields is out and things look like absolute shit anyway. It's not like they are 8-8 and need a win to make the playoffs where Fields comes back and gives the Bears a chance in the playoffs.