Bearly
Guest
I think they are playing the odds of QBs getting acquired the way he was and with reasonable skepticism. It's the implying that I think he's some sort of savior before showing it is my issue with that. Being way ahead of the curve doesn't mean he'll ever be a viable starter but being a UDFA doesn't negate that either, though those odds are obviously not in his favor. Once they make the roster they are more than just a UDFA though the hill is still steeper. We won't know what Bagent is until next year if he gets enough play time this one. It's looking like Fields may not be the destination so it would be nice to see if Bagent has some viability before the draft.I really don't understand why people are not giving him a chance here. Like what do the Bears have to lose? They are 1-5 and Fields is out and things look like absolute shit anyway. It's not like they are 8-8 and need a win to make the playoffs where Fields comes back and gives the Bears a chance in the playoffs.
Posters like to 'read in' a lot on this board.
If I say I need to see more reps to have a good impression of a guy, some poster will imply that I think reps will cure anything or if I reference a RAS score, it will mean I think it's more important than play. Just silly contrarianism based on frustration or simply to instigate.
Last edited by a moderator: