Les Grossman
Well-known member
- Joined:
- Jun 22, 2011
- Posts:
- 15,568
- Liked Posts:
- 14,464
Here's the contradiction in that though - it's a fact that the gap between workers in corporations and executive level staff has been widening over the last 30 years, and earnings at the top have sky-rocketed while the relative pay of general workers has been stagnant, despite an enormous increase in productivity.
Going on the same principle as you mentioned re: paying chefs instead of servers (that the people who actually do the work should be rewarded with the fruits of the labor), Botfly is correct; the pay of general labor is too low relative to the profits they deliver and relative to the economy they live in.
I'm on the same side as you about tipping by the way, I just wanted to point out that I agree with Botfly's remarks in that regard.
(As a side point, contrary to the right wing rhetoric we get a lot, the point of social democracy is not to ensure equal outcome to the lazy as to the hard working. It's to ensure that the social safety net is guaranteed to everyone who needs it, rather than coming in the form of charitable donation on the whim of the wealthy and religious groups to those they deem deserving.)
Yes, I totally agree that the gap between the low-end workers and high-end 'workers' is way too large, and I suppose tipping is a way around that travesty. But, I wasn't really referring to the executive level wages, those are really out of control.
I'm a firm believer in paying/having to pay for what you get, and I don't really see the high value warranting 'over-paying' a server for the job that they actually do and on the other end of the spectrum, I don't see the high value warranting over-paying executives their ridiculous salaries.