<blockquote class="ipsBlockquote" data-author="pmxzus" data-cid="230743" data-time="1401212540">
<div>
Toews, Kane, Sharp, Hossa, Versteeg, Keith, Seabrook, Hjarllmarsson, Bickell - all played on the team that year. Crawford I believe was around as well. I think Ben Smith was with Rockford at the end of that year and may have been called up, but was definitely with them the following year when they were attempting to come back from down 3-0</p>
</p>
These are the leaders of the team anyways, and the ones that will have to step up as a group/core if they are going to win anything - so I'd say they've been through a little bit of adversity as a group and I have confidence if they play to their ability, they can win 3 games in a row.</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
Thing is the Kings have been through the same adversity (esp these playoffs) and have the same core with them that they won a cup with PLUS added talent and more experience where more experience was needed ie Muzzin, Voynov and Toffoli to name just 3. </p>
</p>
I'm with you on staying positive and this Hawks team having the talent and experience to overcome a 3-1 hole. But on the other side I have a lot of respect for the Kings and know also if they play up to their abilities they too can easily win 1 out of 3. Bottom line is this Kings team is really really good. Hawks aren't any better than them when it comes to the variables such as experience, confidence and talent etc etc. What the Hawks actually need to win 3 straight over the Kings is some luck and pucks to bounce their way. I know that "teams create their own luck" but I actually don't believe in that 100%. Sometimes you need a puck to bounce of a stanchion onto your stick or for someone to trip over a blueline. Hawks need some luck.</p>