All I stated is I think the bears need to hit on the pick if they want to win a title within 3 years, given that I think fields is going to be really good.
I explicitly stated it's my opinion. You used the word literally in a statement you can't prove.
All the bears have to show for first round picks of late is fields. I think it's a pipe dream to think that can continue for another year and win a superbowl in the very near future. It's a very simple concept.
Failure to answer that simple question says you're full of shit.
What you were replying to made it sound like you were saying Carter was the only player to take so I guess that is the case. Pretty odd for someone thinking Fields is the guy.
When I reread it I thought maybe you were saying Bijan. Which I could agree with but taking a RB is not without risk.
So I asked, you failed to answer.
Besides that it's a parody of a member the Bears can literally fail on a pick. That was fixed by the NFL quite a while ago so busts don't hurt near as bad.
Like Smith & Mack whoever we take at #9 is probably not going to be long term. Even if they're great their ego will likely be greater and they'll want more money than they're worth.
Talent and willingness to take lower pay on a team that isn't willing to use that money to win isn't likely. Everyone wants $20m/yr and that math doesn't work.
Actuarily the assessment of risk. There are no guarantees in the draft no matter how much your ego tells you that your opinion is a guarantee. You could draft a player one day, the next day they could be diagnosed with leukemia.
So yes the Bears literally can fail actuarily.
About the only thing the Bears can't fail at is providing protection for the QB AGAIN, but even that won't matter to the team long term, only Fields' career. If they don't protect him there's 2 firsts next year to combine and get the #1 pick for the next QB.